Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Va. Appellate Panel Hears Arguments in Padilla Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:24 PM
Original message
Va. Appellate Panel Hears Arguments in Padilla Case
Lower Court Had Ruled That Man Held Three Years in Navy Brig Should Be Tried or Set Free

By Tom Jackman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 20, 2005; Page A09

RICHMOND, July 19 -- A top government attorney declared Tuesday that, in the war on terror, the United States is a battlefield, and therefore President Bush has the authority to detain enemy combatants indefinitely in this country.

Solicitor General Paul D. Clement's comments came as a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit is considering whether to overturn a lower court ruling that Jose Padilla should be charged with a crime or released. In 2002, Padilla, a former Chicago gang member and Muslim convert, was taken into custody by the military and has been held without trial since.
....
The judges were most concerned with how to handle Padilla in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling last year on Yaser Esam Hamdi. Hamdi, also a U.S. citizen, was captured by the military with Taliban forces in Afghanistan and placed in a Navy brig in Norfolk. The Supreme Court ruled that his detention was lawful but that he was entitled to a hearing to challenge the allegations against him.

But moments after Clement began his oral argument, Luttig interrupted to say that "arguably, Judge O'Connor in 'Hamdi' limited that law to the battlefield detention, did she not?" Padilla was picked up at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport on a warrant from a federal court in New York and only later was turned over to the military.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/19/AR2005071901023.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another step toward a Totalitarian Regime.
If Our Dear Leader proclaims someone an enemy combatant, there's no jury trial, no habeas corpus, no defense ... and "detention" indefinitely, sometimes the rest of your life. It can now happen to anyone. The last vestiges of LIMITS on government power are dissolving as we watch. It's fucking incomprehensible to me we're not tarring and feathering these fascist fucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for the update
When the "enemy" loses rights, we all lose rights.

Durned Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC