Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Late Twist in Tobacco Case(grps can argue DOJ didn't rep public interest )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:32 PM
Original message
Late Twist in Tobacco Case(grps can argue DOJ didn't rep public interest )
WP:
A Late Twist in the Tobacco Case
Judge to Let Groups Seek Tougher Penalty if Companies Lose

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 23, 2005; Page A06

Six weeks after the two sides rested in the Justice Department's racketeering case against the cigarette industry, the presiding federal judge agreed yesterday to let six public interest groups intervene and argue for tougher punishment if the government wins.

The unusual decision by U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler will allow groups such as the American Cancer Society and the Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund to make the case that the Justice Department did not properly represent the interests of the public.

In its closing argument on June 7, the Justice Department reduced its requested "remedy," should it prevail, from $130 billion to $10 billion -- a move strongly opposed by the public interest groups.

The groups, which also include the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights and the National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, will be allowed to argue that the companies should be forced to pay more for smoking-cessation programs. They will not, however, be allowed to enter new evidence....

***

In her order, Kessler referred to her own earlier "concern about changes in the government's position, and lack of clarity and finality about those changes."...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/22/AR2005072201743.html?sub=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. GO Kessler
we are so lucky that there are still some judges on the bench who are real justices and chimpy appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think this judge did an amazing thing -- and the DOJ's bizarre...
about-face on this is also pretty amazing, in an entirely different way! And I agree -- thank goodness for independent-thinking judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC