Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Armed but armorless (Quarter of US Troops Iraq lack body armor)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 01:37 AM
Original message
Armed but armorless (Quarter of US Troops Iraq lack body armor)
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/national/s_159851.html

Nearly one-quarter of the 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq still have not been issued a new type of ceramic body armor strong enough to stop bullets fired from assault rifles.
Delays in funding, production and shipping mean it will be December before all troops in Iraq will have the vests, which were introduced four years ago, military officials say.

Congress approved $310 million in April to buy 300,000 more of the bulletproof vests, with 30,000 destined to complete outfitting of the troops in Iraq. Of that money, however, only about $75 million has reached the Army office responsible for overseeing the vests' manufacture and distribution, said David Nelson, an official in that office.

Angry members of Congress have denounced the Pentagon. They say up to 44,000 troops lack the best vests because of the sluggish supply chain, significantly more than the Pentagon figure. Relatives of some soldiers have resorted to buying body armor in the United States and shipping it to their troops, congressional critics say.

<snip>

The House version of an $86.7 billion Iraq spending bill passed last week would include $251 million for body armor and for clearing unexploded munitions, although it's unclear if additional money would speed up the process at this point. President Bush's original request included no more money for body armor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now that's a damn Shame!
This sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a disgrace
<Congress approved $310 million in April to buy 300,000 more of the bulletproof vests...Of that money, however, only about $75 million has reached the Army office responsible for overseeing the vests' manufacture and distribution, said David Nelson, an official in that office.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This deserves more attention
Again I'm wondering where the hell is the congressional investigation of all the shortages for our troops? And where the hell is the urgency. It's not as if the Pentagon didn't know we were going to war. Why didn't they have an item like this on an emergency production schedule ala WWII wartime production. I think there is no excuse for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Our troops have to wait for standard issue body armor
but you can bet that Halliburton and Bechtel don't have to wait to be paid for their looting. Our troops safety is not important to Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, who don't care at all about the casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Accounting to outside preferred vendors
i.e., Halliburton is still done in house. Accounting and cutting checks in house has been subcontracted. Arthur Anderson?
/sarcasm.

Bush lied, a whole lotta people died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
5. 2 weeks ago some Pentagon flubup said
the problem would be taken care of post haste and body armor was on the way. Meanwhile back at the ranch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyorican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. This story has no legs...
because it's a lose-lose "political" issue.

We can blame Bush for not equipping the troops and Bush can blame Clinton for not leaving the military in good shape. Forgetting for a moment the logic behind the statements, when these 2 items are put side by side they cancel and everyone looks less capable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. This just in:
Missing vests stuck in media "filter." pResident urges citizens to remain upbeat. Details to follow.

-30-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC