Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Warns Dems on Roberts Papers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:18 PM
Original message
White House Warns Dems on Roberts Papers
<<SNIP>>
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/07/25/ap/headlines/d8bilur80.txt

White House Warns Dems on Roberts Papers

WASHINGTON - The White House on Monday warned Democrats not to make extensive requests for Supreme Court nominee John Roberts' legal writings in previous Republican administrations, saying many such documents are "out of bounds."

Separately, the Supreme Court nominee waved off questions about whether he was a member of a conservative legal organization. Roberts, on his fourth day paying courtesy calls on senators, hasn't answered questions since President Bush announced him _ as is typical for nominees _ and one Democratic senator said the matter wouldn't affect the confirmation.

With Bush's first chance to shape the Supreme Court at stake, the White House is hoping to avoid the kind of showdown with Democrats over document requests that has stymied Senate confirmation of some of the president's other high-profile nominees. Asked repeatedly to say whether the administration was open to making Roberts' writings as a former administration lawyer available, White House press secretary Scott McClellan avoided saying "no" outright.

"We want to work with the members of the Senate to make sure that they have the appropriate information so that they can do their job," McClellan said.

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. "the appropriate information" being the telling phrase here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bring it on!
Shrieked the chimp.

By all means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not taking bushie's bait
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. oooooooo, scaaarrry
:scared: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. White House acting like the school yard bullies they are
I hope the Democrats have the balls to punch them in the nose.

Kerry has requested documents that are needed to ascertain Roberts's qualifications for the Supreme Court. Roberts's sudden memory loss about his leadership position in the rightwing Federalist Society should give pause to all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. translation: go fuck yourselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. They have traitors up the wazoo on staff in the Bush White House, and
they are worried about the American people learning all there is to know about Judge Frenchfry.

Whacked, totally whacked. The Republicans need a colossal enema.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. LOL, does impeachment qualify as a 'collasal enema'?
Let's get all the turdblossoms cleaned out of the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. No, the Republicans all need a very public
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 10:02 PM by kestrel91316
guillotining party.

The French had the right idea 200 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bush tends to forget that he is not as popular as he used to be
after 9/11, so the adoring public rushing to his side won't materialize. Plus if he appoints Bolton during the recess, then definitely all bets and gloves are even further off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's time to refer to the white house as the white tower (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is this a Sopranos episode?
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. this is outrageous!
A person who is appointed to a lifetime position? You bet your ass we are going to ask questions. As MANY as we want.

Where do we live, in a "kingdom?" Uh, yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. The applicable toon from yesterday..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. This really is the "Fuck You" Administration, isn't it?
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 05:48 PM by PurityOfEssence
Look, assholes, you're talking about a LIFETIME appointment to the highest court in the land for someone whose public track record is skimpy at best. We need to see what this guy's DONE, not what he thinks will get him the gig.

What a high-handed bunch of thugs.

EVERYTHING he's ever done or proposed is not only fair game but should be required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Translation; "Shut the fuck up or we'll KILL every one of you!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. "out of bounds"!! I LOVE IT!
That's like saying, "don't look in here, there's nothing that you want to see. Trust us!!!"

Feh!

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. They're "warning" the Democrats?
This from the same bunch that claimed there was no attorney-client privilege during the Clinton years between any attorney who derived any income from government work and any White House staff. Ken Starr, naturally, was happy to oblige and destroyed any semblance of "privileged" communications in the White House!

Now, the White House is "warning" the Democrats that document requests are "out of bounds"??? I wonder if the talking chuckleheads in the librul media will be in similarly full cry about breaking down assertions of White House privilege as they were eight years ago?

Or did 9/11 change that, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. irony is dead n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oooh, I bet the Dems are just SO scared of the big, scary Repukes
in Bush's White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Breaking News: Dicky Durbin Issues An Apology.
More infor later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Roberts is a slimy "yes"-man....
He's gaga for authority! His whole life has been one suck-up situation after another. 100% establishment tool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC