Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy: 'Activist' Nominee Won't Get Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:17 PM
Original message
Leahy: 'Activist' Nominee Won't Get Vote
<<SNIP>>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-5171325,00.html

Leahy: 'Activist' Nominee Won't Get Vote

WASHINGTON (AP) - Top Judiciary Committee Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont said he will vote against Supreme Court nominee John Roberts if the judge seems likely to pursue an ``activist'' philosophy. Another Democrat said Roberts assured him he is no ideologue.

In an interview broadcast Tuesday on Vermont Public Radio's ``Switchboard'' program, Leahy said he would vote against the appeals court judge if it seemed as if he would pursue an activist agenda on the court. In selecting Roberts, President Bush emphasized that he was looking for someone who would not legislate from the bench.

Leahy said he's worried that Roberts might try to unravel matters that should be settled law.

Denouncing conservatives on the current court, the Vermont senator said in the interview: ``They have struck down parts of the Violence Against Women Act, environmental acts, child safety legislation.''

<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. only 59 senators left to go.
may they all hold up to the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go, Leahy! He's RIGHT.
From the article: "In selecting Roberts, President Bush emphasized that he was looking for someone who would not legislate from the bench."

****

Bush always SAYS the opposite of the real intentions...haven't they learned anything yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good! Stand up to the bullies! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Roberts is a pre-owned TOOL, through-and-through...
The POS helped draft Da Blivet's SC case for the 2000 election challenge...

And B*SH rewarded him with a JUDGESHIP (On the THIRD try)

This is the best "STEALTH" candidate they can come up with;
He's a lapdoggy for Corporate interests,
but you can't complain about his 'record' because he
DOESN'T FRICKING HAVE ONE!!!!

His NON-Judge Record: Mouthpiece for corporations who want to violate the rights of citizens.
He spent 20 years getting REALLY good at using the LAW
to allow the RICH to F*CK the ordinary.

CUE the goddamn Postcard-campaign:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The Dude's been groomed for this from
day one (lawschool?) No paper trail, worked only for repub administrations, then worked for one of those "important" DC lawfirms associating with only the best in the party. When did he marry? I get the feeling his family was bought and paid for to go along with the package they are selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nice to hear-
Now, if we could only replace Harry Reid with someone like Leahy, we might be able to actually put up a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What do you have against Senator Reid? I think he's doing a damn
good job and puts up a hell of a good fight against the GOP.

Harry Reid's Time Clock;

IA Leak Case By the Numbers

Number of days after the article outing Ambassador Wilson's wife appeared that the White House required its staff to turn over evidence relating to the leak: 85

Approximate hours between then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzalez's advance notification to White House Chief of Staff Andy Card that he would require staff to turn over evidence relating to the case and formal notification to staff of that requirement: 12

Minimum number of times an Administration official leaked classified information about the identity of Ambassador Wilson's wife: 11

Minimum number of times after the beginning of the Justice Department's investigation that White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan claimed Karl Rove was not involved: 5

Number of press conferences since evidence linking Karl Rove to the leak was made public where Press Secretary McClellan has refused to comment on the case, citing an ongoing criminal investigation: 7

Minimum number of hearings held by Senate Republicans to investigate accusations against President Clinton involving the "Whitewater" case: 20

Total hearings held by Senate Republicans to investigate the leak of the covert identity of Ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife: 0

http://democrats.senate.gov/leak.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Reid is all talk and NO action
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 05:01 PM by depakid
and I have a distaste for people like that.

Reid will get up and make a bunch of provocative statements that he has no intention of backing up- (like for instance saying he's shut down the Senate over three of the most extreme and unqualified people to ever be nominated to the federal bench).

Basically, the man's not a leader- he's given the far right EVERY SINGLE THING that they've wanted since he took over- with nary a fight- and even crossed party lines to vote with the Republicans on the bankruptcy bill.

His silly little "clock" is just another cute example of his impudent AND impotent style. The way I see it- he needs to either put up or shut up- because up to this point, his performance has been an embarassment to the party (and quite frankly- to himself).

Contrast that with Bob Dole's performance in 93-95. Dole did a whole lot more with a whole lot less. As I recall, the senate then was one vote short of a filibuster proof majority... for the Dems....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I'll second that! Reid is a politician, not a LEADER. And a POOR one.
Considering the FREE POINTS the Goppers have been tossing up lately,
a REAL leader would be demanding HEADLINES
and tearing them to shreds
like a kitten with a new roll of TP.

Even an AVERAGE "Politician" would be making some hay with
current events....

But Reid continues to wander about his own little world,
mumbling to himself...

Reid is a JOKE. A sad JOKE.

WE represent the MAJORITY; we deserve much better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Your showing your ignorants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I totally agree. Reid has been doing a tremendous job.
He's kept the Dem votes together more than any other time. He's stressed the importance of staying on message. He's making sure (along with Pelosi) that the message gets framed. He's fighting and uses fighting words. Certainly an improvement over Daschle and I liked him. Give him a chance. It's only been 6 months. Bolton didn't get in. The nuclear option didn't go off (yet at least). Considering what he took over and what he's up against, I don't know who could do better that people wouldn't criticize within a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Meme to spread: ACTIVIST JUDGE
how can the R argue? They're 100% against "activist judges"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am beginning to really like Leahy, I love a man that stands up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I really hope he sticks to his guns
We really need some strong backboned Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upoceg Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. what did Roberts do
to get Shumer to shill for him?
Chuck's never been the best Senator to bear the title, but this is a little much. He should be taking pointers from Leahy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. Once he's on the bench, he'll represent his masters. Is he going to...
...give his Scout's Honor to be fair? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Violence Against Women Act "destroys families and is anti fathers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC