Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge to Media: Reveal Wen Ho Lee Sources (Novak are you listening

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:51 PM
Original message
Judge to Media: Reveal Wen Ho Lee Sources (Novak are you listening
AP News


Judge to Media: Reveal Wen Ho Lee Sources
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: October 14, 2003


Filed at 6:28 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal judge has ordered five reporters, including one from The Associated Press, to reveal their sources for stories that portrayed Wen Ho Lee, a former nuclear weapons scientist, as a chief suspect in a Chinese espionage investigation.

U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ordered the reporters to answer questions about their sources and to provide Lee's attorneys with notes and other documents from their reporting.

..more at article....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isnt TPJ the Microsoft anti-trust judge? A republican who clearly
acted like he thought Microsoft was a monopoly. He spoke to Toobin about the case, was it? He got kicked off the case, or something like that. Microsoft ended up with a more favorable settlement under a different judge.

Was that the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damnraddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, no! Novak's a conservative who spouts the Bushista line.
So he's above the law. This only applies to reporters from the 'librul media.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, Jackson is the first Microsoft Judge
and he was an idiot to speak to the press on a case he was handling. It sounds to me like he gets so angry when the facts come out that he can't control himself. And he is just wrong the disclosure of sources here. I've been in the media and my law practice includes plenty of free press issues. There isn't a ghost of a chance that Jackson is right on disclosing confidential sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then where is the justice for Wen Ho Lee?
This guy got screwed pretty good, and even the FBI was caught lying under oath. Wasn't this affair fixed to make Clinton look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's about time!
I always suspected that our good friends, the right-wing conspiracy, were behind the planting of these stories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If there is a civil suit...can't they be made to disclose the information?
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-14-03 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. After reading this thread, I don't know what to think of the chances
that Mr. Lee will get any redress, but I wish there were some way for the press to admit that it was WAY out of bounds (and maybe even make a story out of "bum steers" it got from malicious leakers?). I remember reading or hearing that it was the NYT that was leading the charge against Lee. I'm pretty sure they'll never admit to having done anything wrong in this case. Sigh.

I'm all for the protection of the press, but there are times when there are press abuses that are simply appalling. Novak is one such (did you see the LTE today in the NYT from an emeritus dean of Columbia School of Journalism smashing Novak?). The NYT on Wen Ho Lee is another. But if the leakers lied or broke laws, is the confidentiality inviolable? I don't think so. (What about doctor-patient confidentiality in the case of a crime commited? And could a doctor be forced to testify or release records? Is there a parallel here? It's different for lawyers of course because of the presumption of innocence, and the lawyer's role in defense.)

I don't buy the argument that a journalist would never be trusted with leaks again. But even if it were true, surely an ethical journalist should risk it. There are many kinds of leak, and any sensible journalist should be able to figure out when s/he is being used for unethical purposes. IMO, Novak was wrong not to question the motives of the leaker, wrong to print the name, and wrong not to tell the FBI who leaked. I am less sure of the possible motives of the leaker/s in the Lee case, but my heart goes out to Lee and his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC