Cuba embargo faces new critics
August 4, 2005
BY VANESSA ARRINGTON
ASSOCIATED PRESS
HAVANA -- American liberals have long criticized the U.S. government for maintaining a Cold War-era embargo against communist Cuba. But these days, conservative American farmers, businessmen and some Republican lawmakers are just as likely to oppose the U.S. policy limiting trade with the island.
As Congress voted down amendments to the policy last week, those pushing for more interaction with Cuba questioned how the embargo can endure.
"Will someone please explain this policy to me?" asked Dwight A. Roberts, president of the U.S. Rice Producers Association, at a recent news conference in Havana after describing financial losses to thousands of rice growers when U.S. restrictions were tightened.
U.S. food and agricultural products can be sold to Cuba on a cash-only basis under an exception to the embargo created in 2000. But a new U.S. rule adopted this year makes Cuba pay for goods in full before the cargo leaves U.S. ports, forcing the country to seek other markets and harming U.S. business, Roberts said.
(snip)
The group says opinion polls show most U.S. citizens support a change in Cuba policy.
(snip/...)
http://www.freep.com/news/nw/cuba4d_20050804.htm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~The odd arrangement for payment for the narrow assortment of items American farmers can sell to Cuba was concocted after
Bush was selected, working with the Cuban right-wing "exile" faction. It was a triumph of duplicity. The arrangement which was used previously, fashioned in 2000, after Cuba was devastated by a hurricane, and lost its food in storage, was itself very harsh, but allowed Cuba to pay cash upon delivery of agricultural items.
The new arrangement, also forbidding credit to Cuba, to American farmers' great dismay, requires payment prior to shipment. This means the materials are formally Cuba's property, and the "exile" spokemen have intimated it is their intention to intercept the shipments and claim them in lieu of their property which they left behind in Cuba when they got the hell out of there during and after the revolution. Some of them undoubtedly feared what would happen to them at the hands of the citizenry without their corrupt Batista government to protect them, like the private army/death squad owner, a politician and newspaper publisher, Rolando Masferrer ("Masferrer's Tigers") who got blown up, anyway,carbombed, in Florida, for his troubles.
They have already managed to use the American courts to lay claims to at least one airplane which was hijacked and flown to the U.S. from Cuba by a man who didn't have the patience to go through the ordinary legal immigration channels. That airplane was handed over as part of a settlement to a woman who sued a man, who married her, who came to Florida to spy on some Cuban "exile" terrorists, to try to block their next attacks on Cuba. She claimed Cuba and the man used her for political reasons, and she wanted satisfaction. She got the airplane, courtesy of the conniving "exiles."
They are opeating as pirates, and would use the U.S. court system to grab the shipments of corn, rice, vegetables, fruit, cattle, chickens going to Cuba if Cuba formally owns them at the time they leave the U.S. Easy to see why Cuba hangs back now from these transactions.