Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT/AP: Discovery May Need Unprecedented Repair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:11 PM
Original message
LAT/AP: Discovery May Need Unprecedented Repair
Discovery May Need Unprecedented Repair
By MARCIA DUNN, AP Aerospace Writer


SPACE CENTER, Houston -- A couple short strips of fabric dangling from Discovery's belly may require an unprecedented repair by spacewalking astronauts, if engineers determine there's even a possibility that the problem could endanger the shuttle during descent, NASA said Sunday.

Teams of experts were scrambling to understand just how serious the problem was, with "strong arguments" raging on what to do, if anything.

The trouble has nothing to do with foam or other launch debris, but rather the accidental slippage of ceramic-fiber cloth used to fill the thin gaps between thermal tiles, which some engineers worry could trigger potentially treacherous overheating during re-entry.

It will be Monday before the analysis is complete and mission managers decide whether to have the crew's two spacewalkers cut or pull the two hanging strips....

***

Such a spacewalking feat would be a first: In 24 years of shuttle flight, astronauts have never ventured beneath their spacecraft in orbit and have made few repairs to their ship, certainly none of this magnitude....


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top10jul31,0,50923.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. How frightening to think that another shuttle disaster could happen.
Be safe Discovery crew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. they will burn up a second crew out of arrogance again
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I never understood why they rushed the program back into space?
What does it prove about your space technology prowess if you keep having these life-threatening problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. They used duct tape on Apollo 13........
I'm hoping this is not as serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PunkPop Donating Member (847 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. They are ultrasensitive now.
Who knows how many of these little things were simply ignored in previous flights.

Is it even possible to shoot a gigantic aircraft into space using megapowerful, jet-fueled rockets without something coming loose - something not showing wear and tear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ultra-sensitive doesn't ensure anything but sensitive
not competence, not foresight, not luck, not NOTHIN' including a complete absence of political pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand why they're still using outdated technology.
You're NASA for crying out loud. You can plan elaborate trips to Neptune and back. You can guide the smallest of satellites. You can even send a probe on a collision course with a comet speeding through space at thousands of mile an hour...but you can't ensure the safety of your own crew? One little heat tile pries loose during reentry and you have another national tragedy on your hands. Is that really acceptable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The things are just too old.
The shuttles were designed for a 10 year operating life. The Discovery was completed in 1983! The newest shuttle, the Endeavor, was completed in 1991 with spare parts built for other vehicles in the fleet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. because NASA's not given a free hand: they objected to the less-safe
Shuttle design in use, but they were ignored because a longer cargo bay means better spy and Star Wars satellites; all unmanned launches, by the way, have been completely privatized by *.
The bottom line is, Bushco has only two concerns for space: how many bases and mines they can build up there and how many machine guns can come along
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. The shuttle is a giant candle, with a dangling "wick"
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 01:34 AM by SoCalDem
Of course the fabric will catch fire..:silly:
Perhaps it's small enough to just disintegrate, BUT what if the tiny abrasion or nick from which it emanated is vulnerable to the heat penetration.. Sounds eerily similar to last time:cry: Once re-entry is in progress, there's no turning back :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. strangely convenient. a weather delay on the 13th, a piece of foam, now
weird strips of cloth... all newsworthy but not quite dangerous.

either bushco needs a distraction, or NASA needs extra attention to beef up their part of bush's plan to return to the moon and (to infinity and beyond!) off to mars, or... this is all about destroying NASA for good and turning it all over the kind folks at Haliburton. can you imagine that painted down the side of a US rocket?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Spacewalkers may have to repair shuttle
Managers consider what to do about pieces dangling from Discovery

A couple of short strips of material dangling from Discovery’s belly may require an unprecedented repair by spacewalking astronauts, if engineers determine there’s even a possibility that the problem could endanger the shuttle during descent, NASA said Sunday.

Teams of experts at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Texas scrambled to understand just how serious the problem was, even as astronauts transferred tons of supplies from the shuttle to the international space station and prepared for the 13-day mission's second spacewalk.

The latest concern has nothing to do with foam or other launch debris, but rather the accidental slippage of ceramic-fiber fabric used to fill the thin gaps between thermal tiles. It will be Monday before the analysis is complete and mission managers decide whether to have the crew’s two spacewalkers cut or pull the hanging material.

More at the MSNBC website

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And if their repair "fails" the astronauts will be "blamed"
for their own demise:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. its almost like they need to create an interest
manufacture drama to keep the ratings up, the shuttle went up many times before without a problem. seems like they are constructed out of eggshells now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. There have been a couple of problems in the past...
Remember how the last shuttle flight ended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. When the shuttles were new, they were a lot safer to fly....
...just like an aging automobile, once they get older, things tend to fall apart faster. The first shuttle flight took place in 1982 after five years of testing (1977-1982). Just four years later in January 1986, the Challenger was blown apart on take-off. In 1988, flights resumed and continued for the next 15 years until the Columbia disaster in 2003.

Old technology coupled with an aging and very complex platform spells trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. what do they use on the Russian vehicles to keep them from burning up?
anyone ever ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Soyuz uses an ablative heat shield.
It reflects heat just from the fact that it absorbs it and then melts off the capsule. Soyuz are designed to be used only once though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. The Russians say they've got our backs on this
Russia ready for shuttle rescue mission if needed
MOSCOW (AFP) - Russia could send up to three Soyuz rockets to the International Space Station (ISS) between now and February if an evacuation of the ISS crew become necessary due to problems with the US space shuttle Discovery, officials said.

..."We are hopeful and believe in the shuttle mission. But if our American partners need help, we can be of service..."

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. sure hope they're taking the Sun's activities into account.....
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 07:02 AM by jus_the_facts


FLARE 0-24 hr 24-48 hr
CLASS M 75 % 75 %
CLASS X 15 % 15 %

http://spaceweather.com/

....they could be crispy critters if not?! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. My grandma used one of those spacewalkers...

..they sure can come in handy in a pinch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Peanut Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Budget cuts
27 August 2003

Budget Cuts Compromised NASA's Focus on Safety, Investigative Board Finds

Aug. 27--WASHINGTON--Devastating budget cuts forced NASA to slash space-shuttle programs as Congress funded pet projects and the agency's former director ignored complaints the cutbacks would hurt safety.

...budget cuts, coupled with the rise in priority of the international space station, resulted in NASA's raiding the space-shuttle budget under former Administrator Dan Goldin -- cutting the space plane's spending by more than 40 percent.

Goldin, whose "faster, better, cheaper" motto drove the agency in the 1990s, often rejected the criticism that he was sacrificing safety in the name of efficiency, the report said.

...Diverting that money came as the aging shuttle fleet needed more money to keep it flying safely, the report concluded.

Under a section titled "An Agency Doing Too Much With Too Little," the report paints a picture of budgetary neglect that diverted money from safety programs.

"Of all NASA's efforts, that program has been hardest hit by the budget constraints of the past decade," the report said. The report lists a string of incidents in which the shuttle account was raided to fund space-station overruns, a Mars program and other expenses....

http://www.rednova.com/news/space/7730/budget_cuts_compromised_nasas_focus_on_safety_investigative_board_finds/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. They should try the repair, but send the shuttle down by remote control
And catch a lift back down on the Russian craft. At this point, sending the astronauts down on the shuttle would be an unnecessary risk for purely political appearances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Launch Armor
I guess that we will not be able to launch the shuttle again until it is fitted with launch armor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC