Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Writers Group Won't Give Judith Miller 'Conscience in Media' Award After A

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:03 PM
Original message
Writers Group Won't Give Judith Miller 'Conscience in Media' Award After A
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 12:04 PM by hang a left
Writers Group Won't Give Judith Miller 'Conscience in Media' Award After All
The <a href="http://www.serverlogic3.com/lm/rtl3.asp?si=9&k=new%20york" illegal code"window.status='New York'; return true;" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true;">New York</a> Times Company
Judith Miller




By E&P Staff

Published: August 03, 2005 11:08 AM ET

NEW YORK The board of The American Society of Journalists and Authors (ASJA) has voted unanimously to reverse an earlier decision to give its annual Conscience in Media award to jailed New York Times reporter Judith Miller, E&P has learned.

The group's First Amendment committee had narrowly voted to give Miller the prize for her dedication to protecting sources, but the full board has now voted to overturn that decision, based on its opinion that her entire career, and even her current actions in the Plame/CIA leak case, cast doubt on her credentials for this award.

The group's president, Jack El-Hai, posted an explanation on an internal list-serve yesterday, noting the opposition from the rank and file, and also mentioning two other reasons for the unanimous vote:

* “A feeling that Miller's career, taken as a whole, did not make her the best candidate for the award”


snip>

http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001008093
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why did it take so long for them to figure it out?
DUers have known this for years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dissent1977 Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. How could anyone think she deserved this award in the first place?
With the type of "sources" she uses, and her embarassing "journalism" on the WMDs she was not better than a reporter for the National Review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. The previous vote was a knee-jerk reaction to her imprisonment n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now
if there were a Bush's bitch award, she'd be a shoo-in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I think she'd get the "Media Mattressback" award.
Excellence in sleeping to the top and presstitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. That's funny. In the 60's I ask this guy how he met his wife.
He said she was standing at Hollywood & Vine with a mattress on her back and it was love at first sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. She'd Definitely Win MWO "Whore Of The Year"
If that distinction didn't have Jeff Gannon as the heir apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is GREAT news!
At last a group of journalists are abandoning that weird notion that Judy has the right, as a reporter, to conceal a crime! Now, if only the MSM will actually report on this news and get some knowledgeable people to explain the decision. ..."A feeling that Miller's career TAKEN A WHOLE did not make her the best candidate for the award..." Wow. An indictment in itself!
Thanks! You've cheered me up a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Awesome news!!
About time somebody opened their eyes! This gives me hope that more people are seeing the boy-king Emperor has no clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreegone Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Awesome News!!
I hate it when people keep getting rewarded for lying and cheating. I guess they figured it out after a few more grand jury subpeonas.

Let's hear it for real integrity:woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. They saw the blood on her tiny little hands. Great news about the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vickie Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fantastic news! This phoney witch is finally being exposed as
the self-absorbed, narcissistic megalomaniac that she is. Rot in jail, Judy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Judith Miller and Robert Novak: Douchebags of Liberty

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. The media is so self serving. THere is so little questioning of her
possible ulterior motives.
Thankfully there is some (huffington post and a few other columns.)
She is part of the neocon team and probably participated in the smear, probably traded info for access. Tit for tat. No MSM sources discuss that. Its not protecting sources. Its MSM right to trade info with impunity. The elephant in the room that no one is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. good.

As a journalist I am sickened by any pretense this woman makes to nobility or courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Thanks
I've been pretty unable to speak to my journalist friends about this. They're adamant that sources must be protected at all costs. And both of them are quite liberal and hate *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. indeed - spitting on the first amendment does not protect or support it
offering it's protection to propagandists is spitting on it, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Someone tell Richard Cohen she's making news, not writing it.
Cohen doesn't seem to read his own paper about her searching for WMDs with troops, giving soldiers orders they had to follow and pinning decorations on soldiers afterwords. Doesn't sound like a 'reporter' to me, but someone with a very large stake in finding WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. A unanimous reversal?
Wow. Either the original decision was a knee-jerk reaction to her imprisonment, which is a good possibility, or someone along the line got a phone call and a little documentary proof about Judith Miller's dedication to professionalism or lack thereof.

Oh well, Judith. At least you're still the Fucking Queen of All Iraq. They can't take that self-bestowed title away from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Fantastic! Give her a trial for aiding and abetting traitors instead!n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hahahaha!
Psyched you out, eh Judy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Perhaps she is still eligible for the Mata Hari award?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. LOL
I don't think she has the belly button for it, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Les Aspin is among the many that know ... and he ain't talkin.
I didn't think anybody would get the Mata Hari reference - thanks.
Sans belli button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yipee! They get it! They really get it this time! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'll be cynical here
And state that no one is opening their eyes in this case. What is happening is that everyone is realizing in the world of journalism that the other shoe hasn't dropped in the case of Miller. They don't want to give an award to someone that is later revealed to be knee deep in what amounts to the most egregious violation of the public trust and abuse of government powers. Miller is more than a mere shill for the White House. She is an outright propagandist that takes pride in her position and status that offensive job brings.

This is far from over with Miller. There's a whole slew of things that need to be covered up, which will require even further abuses of power. It's going to get real interesting. Hold on.

All that crap about the court decision ruling against Miller having the effect of compromising free speech and the integrity of journalism, won't pass the mustard test when all the pieces are put together ... and they will be put together sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. I needed a laugh
Thanks for this post. Weeeeeee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. Ha!
She's sitting in that cell only because she's already ruined as a journalist for helping Cheney propagate his deceit for making war in Iraq and if she reveals anything else she knows she'll only be employable at Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Conscience in Media" award?!
Had to check to see if this was satire. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. WoW!!!!
Holy shite batman!! There are people of conscience in positions where their decisions mean something to other people?? This was in Amerka, land of the ignoramus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. The words "Judith Miller" and "Conscience In Media"
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 02:06 PM by rocknation
don't belong in the same SOLAR SYSTEM, never mind in the same sentence!

Those goofballs at The Onion must at it again!

:rofl:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Not to worry, I hear she is up for the Unconscionable Journalist Award
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
34. Bush'll give her something like this later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. Haw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. Wow, a UNANIMOUS vote to reverse the decision - once again, the rank&file
made a visible differrence.

Judith Miller is no good example of anything but greed and overreaching ambition trumping any trace of ethics.

She's in jail now and loudly stating that she'll never tell anything to anybody because she knows it would be her death warrant, I believe. She knows some damaging stuff about the Bushies and they play rough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. Judith is disqualified--not a real journalist
powertripping groupie stenographer describes her pretty well, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. bwa-hahhha-hhaha haahahhahahhh haahahhhahahaha
I'll say it again:

bwa-hahhha-hhaha-haahahhahahhh-haahahhhahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC