Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inquiry Into Lobbyist (Abramoff) Sputters After Demotion (of prosecutor)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 09:52 AM
Original message
Inquiry Into Lobbyist (Abramoff) Sputters After Demotion (of prosecutor)
Edited on Sun Aug-07-05 10:01 AM by Rose Siding
WASHINGTON — A U.S. grand jury in Guam opened an investigation of controversial lobbyist Jack Abramoff more than two years ago, but President Bush removed the supervising federal prosecutor and the inquiry ended soon after.

The previously undisclosed Guam inquiry is separate from a federal grand jury in Washington that is investigating allegations that Abramoff bilked Indian tribes out of millions of dollars.

In Guam, an American territory in the Pacific, investigators were looking into Abramoff's secret arrangement with Superior Court officials to lobby against a court revision bill then pending in the U.S. Congress. The legislation, since approved, gave the Guam Supreme Court authority over the Superior Court.
....
The transactions were the target of a grand jury subpoena issued Nov. 18, 2002, according to a copy obtained by The Times. The subpoena demanded that Anthony Sanchez, administrative director of the Guam Superior Court, release records involving the lobbying contract, including bills and payments.

A day later, the chief prosecutor, U.S. Atty. Frederick A. Black, who had launched the investigation, was demoted. A White House news release announced that Bush was replacing Black.....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-guam7aug07,1,5281180.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

Abramoff's spokesman says he doesn't recall the investigation. Funny, because Black had released a report about security risks in the Northern Marianas, clients of Abramhoff's. He wrote to them in a memo:

"It will require some major action from the Hill and a press attack to get this back in the bottle."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course Abramoff doesn't recall the investigation
Just like his political patron Bush doesn't remember anything untoward about this insider trading of Harken stock which made his personal fortune. Of course, with Daddy watching over the "investigation," it's probably not surprising that Sonny doesn't remember anything too stressful about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Secretly lobbying for the Superior Court system and hiding the payments!
"In Guam, an American territory in the Pacific, investigators were looking into Abramoff's secret arrangement with Superior Court officials to lobby against a court revision bill then pending in the U.S. Congress. The legislation, since approved, gave the Guam Supreme Court authority over the Superior Court.

In 2002, Abramoff was retained by the Superior Court in what was an unusual arrangement for a public agency. The Times reported in May that Abramoff was paid with a series of $9,000 checks funneled through a Laguna Beach lawyer to disguise the lobbyist's role working for the Guam court. No separate contract was authorized for Abramoff's work.

Guam court officials have not explained the contractual arrangement. At the time, Abramoff was a well-known lobbyist in the Pacific islands because of his work for the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas garment manufacturers, accused of employing workers in sweatshop conditions."

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. What the hell did Bush know and when did he know it?
Edited on Sun Aug-07-05 10:06 AM by Pirate Smile
Why did he replace the attorney? Who pushed him to do it?

"The timing caught some by surprise. Despite his officially temporary status, Black had held the acting U.S. attorney assignment for more than a decade.

The acting U.S. attorney was a controversial official in Guam. At the time he was removed, Black was directing a long-term investigation into allegations of public corruption in the administration of then-Gov. Carl Gutierrez. The inquiry produced numerous indictments, including some of the governor's political associates and top aides.

Black also arranged for a security review in the aftermath of Sept. 11 that was seen as a potential threat to loose immigration rules favored by local business leaders. In fact, the study ordered by Black eventually cited substantial security risks in Guam and the Northern Marianas.

-snip-
Black's successor, Leonardo Rapadas, was confirmed in May 2003 without any debate. Rapadas had been recommended by the Guam Republican Party for the job. Fred Radewagen, a lobbyist who had been under contract to the Gutierrez administration, said he carried that recommendation to top Bush aide Karl Rove in early 2003.

After taking office, Rapadas recused himself from the ongoing public corruption case involving Gutierrez. The new U.S. attorney was a cousin of "one of the main targets," according to a confidential memo to Justice Department officials."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. DeLay could have lobbied for it
Beyond the campaign dough, weren't they all working on CAFTA-mart by then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. If anyone needs a quick update on what the deal is with the Marianas
Island and the Republicans, here you go:


"The Isles that Bind

Ah, the tropical Northern Marianas Islands. About three-quarters of the way from Hawaii to the Philippines, with a population of just over 80,000, these U.S. territories acquired after World War II are the central locale of a "dirty drama of bondage" that enmeshes disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff, House leader Tom Delay, President Bush, and scores of conservative lawmakers, journalists, and activists. That's because the Marianas (and particularly the main island, Saipan) are also the site of America's most shoddy labor practices. Human "brokers" bring thousands there to work as sex slaves and in cramped sweatshop garment factories where clothes (complete with "Made in the U.S.A." tag) have been produced for all the major brands: Tommy Hilfiger, Gap, Calvin Klein, Liz Claiborne, The Limited, J.C. Penney, and – surprise, surprise – Wal-Mart. The workers are "paid barely half the U.S. minimum hourly wage," and are "forced to live behind barbed wire in squalid shacks minus plumbing, work 12 hours a day, often seven days a week, without any of the legal protections U.S. workers are guaranteed." And if DeLay, Abramoff, and President Bush get to decide, that's how things will stay.

THE 'BIGGEST SUPPORTER' OF SWEATSHOPS ON CAPITOL HILL: That award goes to Tom DeLay, according to Abramoff. And for good reason. In the 1990s, the Clinton administration, with bipartisan support, "tried to crack down" on the worker abuse in the Marianas. DeLay wouldn't stand for it. According to the Los Angeles Times, "DeLay helped lead the fight beginning in 1997 to keep Congress from enacting reforms opposed by Abramoff and his clients that would have required garment manufacturers to pay their workers the higher federal minimum wage." In June of '97, DeLay, then majority whip, and Majority Leader Dick Armey also "promised to block any legislation to increase federal regulation on garment manufacturers." In 1998, DeLay helped kill a "congressional fact-finding trip that was being planned as part of an investigation of sweatshop conditions" at the islands. And three years later, DeLay refused to allow a vote on a bill that "would have barred the use of 'Made in USA' by the island's apparel industry," even though it was co-sponsored by 234 representatives, more than a majority.

'PERFECT PETRI DISH OF CAPITALISM': In Newsweek, Marie Cocco writes that of all the "qualified candidates" for the "worst thing has ever done," one "stands out for its squalor." Likewise, CNN's Mark Shields notes that while many of DeLay's scandals "represent only degrees of avarice," his efforts in Saipan allow one to truly "grasp the moral bankruptcy" of the House leader. Maybe this is because DeLay didn't keep his lobbying for sweatshops secret, but wore it right on his sleeve. DeLay told the Washington Post the islands were a "perfect Petri dish of capitalism. It's like my Galapagos island." And with ABC cameras rolling, DeLay toasted the sweatshop owners and their supportive Saipan officials as "a shining light" who represented "everything that is good about what we are trying to do in America and leading the world in the free-market system." Responding to DeLay's offensive remarks, then-Sen. Frank Murkowski (R-AK) told Shields, "The last time we heard a justification that economic advances would be jeopardized if workers were treated properly was shortly before Appomattox."

ABRAMOFF'S TREASURE CHEST: As if the Marianas didn't have it bad enough. Though they proved "to be a veritable treasure chest for Abramoff," an adviser to the islands' governor told the New York Times that Abramoff's policy was "to play both sides against the middle and take the Marianas for millions of dollars in fees." For instance, Abramoff would say the island government "needed his services because it was the only American territory without a nonvoting delegate to Congress." Except, as documents revealed by the Times show, "he worked hard to kill a bill in Congress that would have given the islands a delegate."

THE BUSH CONNECTION: Ties between Abramoff, President Bush, and Saipan go back as far as 1997, when Abramoff "charged the Marianas for getting then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush to write a letter expressing support for the Pacific territory's school choice proposal." It was the beginning of a beautiful friendship. "Our standing with the new administration promises to be solid as several friends of the will soon be taking high-ranking positions in the Administration," Abramoff wrote island officials in January 2001. He was right. Two members of Abramoff's lobbying team subsequently received positions in the Bush White House, as assistant secretary of labor and head of federal procurement policy in the Office of Management and Budget. In the president's first 10 months, Abramoff and his lobbying team "logged nearly 200 contacts with the new administration." They pressed for "friendly hires" and lax labor laws with officials as high up as Attorney General John Ashcroft and policy advisers in Vice President Dick Cheney's office, and it apparently worked: the islands "fended off proposals in 2001 to extend the U.S. minimum wage to island workers and gained at least $2 million more in federal aid from the administration." By mid-2003, Abramoff "had raised at least $100,000 for Mr. Bush's re-election campaign, becoming one of Bush's famed 'pioneers.'"

BASKING IN THE GLOW OF CORRUPTION: The Marianas soon became a kind of petting zoo for right-wing cognoscenti, who were curious to gaze upon the creations of DeLay's "perfect Petri dish." Abramoff's team "arranged many trips to the Marianas for conservative editorial writers and members of research groups" like the Heritage Foundation, Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, and the Institute for Justice. "This all-out public relations and lobbying blitz brought the back from the brink of legislative disaster," Abramoff wrote in 2001. Abramoff also flew dozens of lawmakers and their aides for luxurious vacations to the balmy islands, including one 1997-98 New Year's trip for DeLay and his wife. It was then that DeLay offered Abramoff this now infamous toast: "When one of my closest and dearest friends, Jack Abramoff, your most able representative in Washington, D.C., invited me to the islands, I wanted to see firsthand the free-market success and the progress and reform you have made."

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=678501


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. sounds like Bushler's plan for the rest of the US
The REX 84 camps there's photographic evidence of have guesstimated capacities around 20 million prisoners. Now assume that most haven't been found...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Like * is planning to do with Fitzgerald?
...but President Bush removed the supervising federal prosecutor and the inquiry ended soon after.

Is Smirky planning to do the same with Fitzgerald? Firing his boss hoping the investigation will sputter out?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1682911

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watrwefitinfor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. We need to pay attention to this part.
The timely message in this posting:


"...but President Bush removed the supervising federal prosecutor and the inquiry ended soon after."

"A day later, the chief prosecutor, U.S. Atty. Frederick A. Black, who had launched the investigation, was demoted. A White House news release announced that Bush was replacing Black....."


Wat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "..Bush removed the supervising federal prosecutor and the inquiry ended
..."

Oil up the torches and polish your pitchforks, we're gonna need 'em real soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. now that is power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. Judge dismisses final four charges against Guam governor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. GUAM!! why is this in Guam?
i want my freaking country back.

gee, wouldn't it be nice if i had something more constuctive to say -- a better FRAME?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. How does he keep getting away with it? And is Bush setting precedent
for all presidents to come. They will no longer even have to pretend they work for us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. because the media is no longer independent from the government. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. THIS is the impeachable stuff that escapes the media.
If we actually had a REAL broadcast news media, instead of a bunch of either drooling bubble head beauties or screaming artery poppin' partisan hacks, then this kind of shit would lead to impeachment. Instead... the broadcast news is hellbent on keeping their pals in office and selling lots of cereal, and cars, and toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's the Saturday-Night-Massacre in Broad Daylight n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Holy mackerel, talk about brazen Bush corruption
This is more naked than the Plame affair. If this doesn't hit MSM headlines within a couple of weeks, you know some people in the media are on the take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. what are you talking about? We already know they're all on the take.
The MSM is even owned outright by defense contractors in a number of instances. Plus if you see the satellite broadcasts you get to see fun things like male news anchors getting coated in pancake makeup, and not-so-fun things like (very rare, I only saw one instance) soldiers incongruously accidentally stepping in front of the camera during the commercial breaks. I have no explanation for the soldier popping out of nowhere (nor have I seen anything suggesting an explanation for it).

It was a documentary based entirely on tuning in on cable satellite feeds and showing the portions that were edited out. Someone help with the name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Gee does this look familar, where have we seen this trick before...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1682911

Like I said in my reply #5, of above linked post, this stinks!

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC