Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Recruiting Up, Meets July Targets (Guard & Reserve miss target)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:06 AM
Original message
Army Recruiting Up, Meets July Targets (Guard & Reserve miss target)
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 11:09 AM by sabra

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/n/a/2005/08/10/national/w084504D96.DTL&type=printable

Army Recruiting Up, Meets July Targets

(08-10) 08:45 PDT WASHINGTON, (AP) --

The active-duty Army reached its recruiting target for the second straight month in July, but the summertime rebound may not be enough for the service to fulfill its annual goal, according to figures provided by a Pentagon spokesman Wednesday.

The Army National Guard, meanwhile, missed its recruiting goal again, recruiting only 4,712, 80 percent of its July goal of 5,920 new Guard members, spokesman Bryan Whitman said. The Guard has hit its target only once in the last 19 months.

The U.S. Army Reserve also fell short of its target, recruiting 2,131 new reservists, 82 percent of its goal of 2,585, Whitman said.

The Pentagon has blamed the recruiting shortfalls in part on an economy that's providing other opportunities to high school and college graduates. Opinion polls also show young people and parents are turning away from Army service because of the ongoing combat in Iraq and Afghanistan.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Once Again
The Army lowered their target number so they can crow about meeting their goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. didn't they bullshit their last excuse by saying it was a season lowering?
They lowered the limit because, "seasonly" this time of the year they usually get less recruits?

Let's watch and see if they raise it next month back to were it was before...cough, cough, bullshit, cough, cough...

colossal failure*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. The army lowered it's target numbers twice.
Not just once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, I believe the Pentagon.
"The Pentagon has blamed the recruiting shortfalls in part on an economy that's providing other opportunities to high school and college graduates."

:rofl:

I guess that's why they have to recruit high school dropouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. but * said the economy is so good
</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Other opportunities
Like that long line at Burger King!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. they are cross-selling their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Army numbers look off to me - I think they readjusted the monthly
goals just so they could say they met them, because they don't seem to add up...

"So far (year from Oct04-present), 55,207 new recruits have enlisted, 89 percent of its year-to-date target of 62,385.

The Army measures its annual goal from October 2004 to September 2005, which coincides with the federal budget year. The Army is trying to enlist 80,000 by the end of September. Officials are not confident they will make up the shortfall by then, although they have made progress during the summer, which is considered the high season for recruiting, as recent high school graduates look for work."

So the total goal is 80,000 for the year - which means that even if they met the goals up to now and had their 62,385 recruits - they would still need to get almost 18,000 in 2 months...doesn't seem to break down right per month. I know recruiting goes up in the summer, maybe that explains it, but does it really go up that much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. April's goal was 8,000. 8086 is no big accomplishment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. They admit it: Army poised to miss 2005 recruiting goal
Army poised to miss 2005 recruiting goal

The Army, aiming to get 80,000 recruits this year, stood 11 percent
behind its year-to-date goal at the end of July, with just two months
left to overcome a shortfall of more than 7,000. It has not missed an
annual recruiting goal since 1999.
<snip>

"I know our recruiters are going to do what they can to close the gap,
but right now it looks like we will miss both active and reserve (goals)
at the end of the year," said Army Recruiting Command spokesman Douglas
Smith.


http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-08-10T205100Z_01_N10516228_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-IRAQ-USA-RECRUITING-DC.XML
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Typical faux numbers.
There is no such thing as 'Army Reserve' anymore! You're going to Iraq, boys and girls. Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. If you believe this, then the Army recruited 8,086 in July.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darkhawk32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Ok, let's say they did... this is supposed to be their BUSY season...
Students are graduating and joining up during this time.

8086 barely beats April's goal of 8000.

Mind you they lowered May's goal to 6700 and June's Goal to 5650.

I will try to find out last year's July goal and in years past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. PERSCOM admitted lowering the monthly goals ...
but said that 80,000 remianed their annual goal.

That will be the number they miss by a long shot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
9.  ahh... must be all of those YAffies

the Young Americans for Freedom and the Young Repugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Where does it say what the July goal was?
Or how many people enlisted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. (1) Shoot arrow. (2) Draw bullseye.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. That's it. You got it perfect.
Nothing else need be said about this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. 3) Annotate OER Support Form
"Achieved monthly recruiting quota 45 out of 48 months in the rating period!"


Oopsie! Missed the annual goal by 30% though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoBotherMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is enlist when the recruit goes to basic?
A young man at our office was called by his recruiting officer the last week of July and told that he would get a $2,000 bonus if he would agree to ship off to basic the next day: He was scheduled to appear on August 27. He declined. But I thought maybe the Marines were trying to improve the monthly numbers by offering the early recruitment. I'm just not clear on what comprises "enlist." D ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. Just occurred to me that Pentagon "renaming" the war into a
global struggle (Meyers was very much into that) and talking about dramatically reducing troops next year (even though B. keeps saying no exit date, no exit date), are recruitment tools. You have to convince people first that the war will be over or almost over before they contemplate enlisting. Last two months is about right. There probably has been a peak of sorts -- all based on Pentagon's new PR which often contradicts B's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. According to a recent NYT article,
4 of the top 12 recruiter "producers" are in Guam, as the military is actively going after poor kids in the US terrorities. What's next? Handing out green cards like candy on the streets of Mexico and in Central America to entice impoverished teenagers to come to the US to become cannon fodder?

Desperate to avoid a draft, but determined to see PNAC through, who knows how low the neocons will stoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. and folks thought the (one) 'minute' men.....
were massing at the border to shoot crossing brown people. NO, They each have a bundle of recruitment applications, with the promise of ' if you live.... then you might have a shot at an american job.

If you have the highest raghead body count, then citizenship is yours baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. I saw several slick new Army ads on Comedy Central last night.
Seems like an ad blitz is now on. They make the big green killing machine look so romantic. Liars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Only mullet head FReeper rednecks believe ANYTHING that comes
from this administration anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_to_war_economy Donating Member (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Army Recruiting Up, Meets July Targets
The active-duty Army reached its recruiting target for the second straight month in July, but the summertime rebound may not be enough for the service to fulfill its annual goal, according to figures provided by a Pentagon spokesman Wednesday.

The Army National Guard, meanwhile, missed its recruiting goal again, recruiting only 4,712, 80 percent of its July goal of 5,920 new Guard members, spokesman Bryan Whitman said. The Guard has hit its target only once in the last 19 months.

The U.S. Army Reserve also fell short of its target, recruiting 2,131 new reservists, 82 percent of its goal of 2,585, Whitman said.


http://apnews.myway.com//article/20050810/D8BT22287.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Didn't they lower their official goals a few months back? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. are they counting noncitizens from Guam etc?-- Was it the army that
reduced its goals a few months ago? I do not recall which branh of the military did this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. How much are they bribing new recruits to sign up now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ls317 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Dont forget the increase the age of recruits...
You can be 42 and still sign on for active duty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Whew...I better get moving. Only 3 more years left to sign up!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I can hear Cheney now: "Tank the economy, then they'll join up ...
Oh, and give 'em a bigger bonus and raise the eligible age. That should just about do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. This is almost certainly a half-truth or "statistical adjustment"
No question about. It is the typical Bushevik response to a problem.

Coincidentally, minus murderous violence, it was the dientiucal response of the Nazis and the Soviets to "inconvenient facts".

And AP is as reliable a "news" organization as Soviet Pavda when it comes to debunking the Lies of THE PARTY.

I am so tired of lies. I am so tired of NOT living in the Free World!

I want to be FREE again, and not just this pale shadow of what was, this clock counting down to when the Bush Grandchildren, already sharpening their murderous teeth at prep schools around the nation.

It will be THEY, the Nero/Caligulan Generation of Bushes, who will finally strip the bullshit away from their (Virtual-)Slave Empire (but, to be honest, it will probably be the NICEST Slave-Based Empire that ever was for it's Imperial Subjects-- that's the "Virtual" part...no, nothing even close to what we enjoy today, but isn't that progress that our Totalitarianism will be so much NICER than the Nazis?)

Anyway, to drag this back to the original topic, one simple rule is all that need to be remembered to deal with Imperial Pronouncements like this.

The Busheviks lie in identical fashion (though the actual lies are different and not ususally race-based, at least their public lies) to the Soviets. The Busheviks lie with equal frequency to the Nazis.
In otherwords, this figure is likely a partial lie orperhaps a total one.

Anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. The real or "new and imporved" recuitment targets?
It would have to be up significantly to make up for months of shortfall.
They'll never make the yearly target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. What the article does NOT tell you
...is what the goal was for July 2004. Get that number, compare, and then you know how bad they are hurting. Even with stop-loss and contract enforcement, they are not pulling the numbers, and everyone knows it. The annual goal will tell the tale, as will the troops deployed in the sandbox who will start feeling the pain when replacements fail to arrive. Also, when stateside and "civilized overseas" billets remain unfilled, you'll see strains at those installations as well.

Anyone can get under the limbo bar if it is held over your head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mammoth Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. but TONS of folks will get inspired by the 9/11 Freedom Walk!
...and since you have to register to march, https://www.penfed.org/freedomwalk/register.asp
recruiters will know just how to get in touch with ya to tap some of that light sweet patriotism and get ya to join the war, um, struggle, um, war for sweet light crude. oooh wee!
Ain't jingoism grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. kick
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
37. Army poised to miss 2005 recruiting goal
THE US Army, hard pressed to attract new soldiers amid the Iraq war, exceeded its July recruiting goal but seems doomed to miss its target for the year, while the Army Reserve and National Guard fell short of their goals again.

Full story:

http://www.gg2.net/viewnews.asp?nid=557&tid=countryNews&catid=UK%20News


**********************************************************************

This means real problems for front line infantry units, already hurting for personnel. Every soldier in a squad has an important job and when you start losing guys and not getting replacements, it makes things much more dangerous.

Maybe Bush can call out republicans under 42 years of age and tell them to "bring it on" to the recruiting station. I'm sure the freepers would all rush to sign up for the war they love to cheerlead. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Ugh, yeah.
And they only 'met' the July goal because they lowered the goal :eyes: Well, if we can't meet the standard, we'll just lower it! That's a great plan, guys. All hat, no cowboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Well, don't you think they would have to lower the standards to
get the Repugs ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yeah, but they didn't just lower the standards
Although they did that, too. They lowered the target number of recruits, as well. You know, if we can't get to 100, let's just change the goal to 80. "Good enough for government work"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnite Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Geez, who wouldn't want to die in a senseless war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
42. I read a few days ago that they are recruiting kids from
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 07:00 PM by anitar1
Saipan, Guam and other territories. These kids are eager to get out into the world and off their islands, and fall for the line. One recruiter was bragging about his sign-up bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Let me guess, their 'targets' are a fraction of what they were.
what are the recruiters doing now? Offering prostitutes, breast implants , threats ?(they actually did the latter two)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC