Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SENATE WATCH-10/16/2003 (#1-9:30 AM)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:14 AM
Original message
SENATE WATCH-10/16/2003 (#1-9:30 AM)
108th Congress
1st Session
Thursday, October 16, 2003


The Senate convenes at 9:30 AM.

Following a period of morning business (not to exceed 60 minutes), the Senate will resume consideration of S. 1689, the Iraq/Afghanistan Supplemental Appropriations bill. Byrd Amdt. 1818, to impose a limitation on the use of sums appropriated for the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund, will be the pending amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kennedy to assail Bush over Iraq war- Senate floor today
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 07:20 AM by sierra_moon
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2003/10/16/kennedy_to_assail_bush_over_iraq_war/

<snip>
Ratcheting up his criticism of the war in Iraq, Senator Edward M. Kennedy accuses the Bush administration of telling "lie after lie after lie" to defend its policy in a fiery speech prepared for delivery today on the Senate floor.

"The trumped up reasons for going to war have collapsed," Kennedy says in a speech that underscores his opposition to President Bush's request for $87 billion to fund military operations and rebuilding in Iraq and Afghanistan. An advance copy of the speech was obtained by the Globe.

"The administration still refuses to face the truth or tell the truth," Kennedy says, accusing the White House of misleading the public about every aspect of the war, from the financial costs to the motivation and the aftermath. "Instead the White House responds by covering up its failures and trying to sell its rosy version of events by repeating it with maximum frequency and volume, and minimum regard for realities on the ground."
...
"All the administration's rationalizations as we prepared to go to war now stand revealed as double-talk. The American people were told Saddam Hussein was building nuclear weapons. He was not. We were told he had stockpiles of other weapons of mass destruction. He did not. We were told he was involved in 9/11. He was not. We were told Iraq was attracting terrorists from Al Qaeda. It was not. We were told our soldiers would be viewed as liberators. They are not. We were told Iraq could pay for its own reconstruction. It cannot. We were told the war would make America safer. It has not."


</snip>

s_m


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sweet!
I'm THERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveG Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Byrd up now
Doing a great job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. What was the House vote on this supplemental?
Did they vote already and what was the vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. The amendment to watch
is Senator Byrd's. Ted Stevens is going to ask to table it.

Byrd describes this amendment, in short, as "UN in - US out". This amendment will hold the pResident accountable. Won't give him the $10 billion until he gives detailed plans, gives an exit strategy, etc. I think it was Senator Harken who mentioned "kings" and "dictators" again. Wow! Really good stuff today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No vote on Byrd's amendment until this aft.
One female senator(not Hillary, I was only listening, not watching) spoke for Byrd's amendment...and Leahy was HOT!!

It would make the U. S. get a new resolution from the UN for a multi-national force under U. S. command(the only bad part) and make the administration prove they have a plan for reconstruction in Iraq and that it was working and on timetable and report back in 6 months, in order to get the other $10 Billion, which CONGRESS WOULD HAVE TO AUTHORIZE.

call your Senators now!! NO BLANK CHECK.Vote for the Byrd Amendment!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I believe that was
Barbara Boxer whom you were listening to. Leahy WAS hot. He was practically yelling. Senator Harken said we trusted you the first time, Mr. pResident, but not again (something to that effect. Harken was careful not to say the words I "don't trust" you this time. I believe it was Harken to said that Haliburten was overcharging for gas in Iraq by .66 cents. He said it was the American people's tax money going to Haliburten. Also, one of the Senators said something about "war profiteering".

Also, John Kerry is one of the co-sponsors of Byrd's amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chuck Schumer introducing an
amendment calling for the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate leaking of CIA operative's name. Saying Ashcroft should recuse himself from the investigation.

Putting article into record about Federal prosecuters objecting to the way the investigation is being conducted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. On the Motion to Table the Byrd Amendment
AGREED TO Yeas 57 Nays 42.

:puke:

Breaux, Landrieu, and Bayh voted in the affirmative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Motion to Table the Lautenberg Amendment ADOPTED 65-34
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 02:58 PM by goobergunch
This amendment holds Cheney responsible for the Halliburton stuff.

Democrats voting in the affirmative: Bayh, Biden, Carper, Conrad, Dorgan, Graham (FL), Jeffords, Landrieu, Lincoln, Miller, Nelson (NE), Nelson (FL)

Republicans voting in the negative: None.

There were a lot of votes being switched, so the above list may not be accurate.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. BBV ALERT: Dodd & McConnell to have colloquy on HAVA
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 03:01 PM by goobergunch
It'll happen later. -Dodd

McConnell calls it "Civil Rights legislation". They want it fully funded....

Dodd will NOT bring it up on the Iraq supplemental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Inouye:
Edited on Thu Oct-16-03 03:19 PM by goobergunch
will SUPPORT the resolution although he opposed going to war.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC