Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: 'Vacationing' Bush Controls News Agenda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:17 PM
Original message
WSJ: 'Vacationing' Bush Controls News Agenda
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 04:22 PM by paineinthearse
Surprisingly candid story, considering the source!

=============================================================

'Vacationing' Bush Controls News Agenda

Far From Washington,
White House Stays on Message During Slow Media Cycles
By CHRISTOPHER COOPER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
August 10, 2005; Page A4

Sweltering in August and swarming with grasshoppers, the Prairie Chapel ranch in Crawford, Texas, isn't everyone's idea of paradise. But a captive press corps and a slow summer news cycle are allowing President Bush to use the Crawford backdrop to push his agenda, far from the distractions of Washington. Operating from the base his aides call the "Western White House," Mr. Bush devoted last week to touting his legislative success in pushing a Central American trade agreement through Congress as well as a bankruptcy overhaul bill. On Monday, Mr. Bush extolled the administration-backed energy bill. Yesterday he praised highlights of the economy, and today he will speak about the recently passed highway bill. Tomorrow, with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice at his side, Mr. Bush will talk up what he views as progress in Iraq before reporters at the ranch.

The president's critics frequently seize on his vacations as fodder for portraying him as an absentee White House resident. He has taken more than 300 days of vacation (not all of it in Crawford) during five years in office, eclipsing workaholics such as Jimmy Carter (79 vacation days in one term) and Bill Clinton (152 vacation days during two terms). But Mr. Bush's August holidays also demonstrate how the administration adroitly times and airs its message. With Congress out of session, many Washington agencies on a vacation schedule and a traveling contingent of White House reporters cooling their heels in Crawford, Mr. Bush can count on dictating news coverage with a series of events that rely heavily on rhetoric and skimp on audience participation.

<snip>

Mr. Reed says the president's poll numbers historically rise when Congress is out of session, a lift the White House badly needs. According to an Ipsos-Public Affairs poll conducted last week for the Associated Press, the president continues to post a low overall approval rating of 42%. On individual issues, the numbers are lower: only 41% approve of his handling of the economy, while 38% support his strategy in Iraq. Using Crawford as a base for getting his word out has served Mr. Bush well in the past. In 2003, for instance, he set the tone of the August news cycle by taking a number of day trips to highlight particular subjects and by limiting reporters' visits to his spread. Crawford offers a further benefit, allowing Mr. Bush to burnish his image as a tough ranch hand who approaches the world's problems with a chain saw and a pair of sturdy work boots.
"I got some phone calls after the Washington protest, but nothing like this," Ms. Sheehan said. "It's pretty much been nonstop interviews since Saturday." She puts the chance of meeting with Mr. Bush at less than one-half of 1%.

Nonetheless, Ms. Sheehan, a self-described "broken-hearted mother," has been treated carefully by the administration, which dispatched National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and Deputy Chief of Staff Joe Hagin to meet with her. In recent weeks, Mr. Bush has emphasized that he is personally affected by the number of U.S. casualties in Iraq. Some activists wonder if Ms. Sheehan may be the first in a line of protestors to descend on Crawford in the dog days of summer. "The coverage of Cindy Sheehan has been extraordinary. I see people in tents outside of the White House all the time and they never get any attention," says Judd Legum, deputy research director for the Center for American Progress, a liberal activist group. "I could see her inspiring others -- she seems to have found a soft spot." If she does start a trend, Ms. Sheehan says, it will be by accident. "It was a spur-of-the-moment thing," to come to Crawford, Ms. Sheehan said. "If it puts a dent in the president's vacation, that's just a bonus."

Write to Christopher Cooper at christopher.cooper@wsj.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...slow summer news cycle??????????????"
Er- last time I checked there was a war, a controversial energy bill, a Vets mom sweating out the prez, the DSM, Traitor/Rovegate, midterms coming up...

What exactly is a "fast" news cycle to these clear eyes conservatives at the WSJ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's why I included the author's name and email address
...should anyone care to give him their thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Could Cooper kiss ass any more?
At least Cindy got some decent coverage, even though he's trying to downplay the impact of what she is doing down there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. More wishful paradigm crap off the top of some freeper "journalist"s
head. I hope that this was on the opinion page because it sure doesn't pass as fact or news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go Cindy Go!
I hope you can find peace in your broken heart someday. Doing something is always a constructive way out of grief, and what a something you're doing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't it the Southern White House?
California was the western one, under Reagan.

Or isn't it PC to point out that Texas is south?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Compound W also is apropos. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Compound W! Good one!
It's filled with a bunch of warts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. "Compound W"! Excellent!
:thumbsup: All organized crime families have family compounds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hey, Texas is big:
it's south to almost central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Try Southern Connecticut . There is nothing Texan about that carpetbagger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. Is Bush allowed in California?
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 10:57 PM by jayctravis
Which is...you know...the actual West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, he's tried to control the news from Crawford.
But Cindy Sheehan has thrown a wrench in those works. And if she is arrested tomorrow, it will look that much worse for Dubya. Of course, if the authorities back off and let her stay, that will be further embarrassment for Dubya. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karla Marx Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Love how they put vacationing in quotes...
...talk about spin. And now Carter and Clinton are termed "workaholics." Gotta love that propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. how people treat Sheehan is an indication of their true inner selfs
Chris Cooper is an ashole.

To wit:
- calling her self-described grieving mother, when she's lost a son, is very low

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. i.e. he's handing orders down to Operation Mockingbird agents
No real news, except maybe that he's doing it instead of Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Another "reporter" that could suck the lead from a pencil. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. a self-described "broken-hearted mother"
No decent human being would imply that a woman who lost her son in a war was anything other than genuinely and understandably heartbroken. Christopher Cooper is a cold, heartless ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm waiting for them to start using the term "alleged" - nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. DictatorBush
runs the place creating more havoc against The People whilst he sits in all his wealth.
POMPOUS ASS!!!:argh:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavendermist Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. I know it does no good but...
this is what I sent in an email:

Mr. Cooper,
I couldn't believe it when I read the headline. If I were a member of the news media I would be ashamed to admit your responsibilities are dictated by an administration that is not supported by more than half the people of the United States.
I also have a question. Why, in 2005, do you call this a "slow summer news cycle?" More than 30 soldiers have died since August 1st-in an unjust war, I might add. Pictures of atrocities are being illegally kept from America. There is a Grand Jury investigating many members of this White House. The protests against the war are beginning to build. There are real questions about the nominee for the Supreme Court.The so-called President cannot tolerate coming out of his bubble to confront a real person who might actually disagree with him to his face. By the way, if it is so slow why not cover Cindy Sheehan and all the respected groups that are supporting her? Did you even hesitate when you wrote "self-described broken-hearted mother." Did you even have a twinge of discomfort at the disrespect? I could go on and on, but I am sure you get the picture. Please don't wait for another woman to be kidnapped to spice up the slow summer. We, the people, are hungering for real news.

At least I said something even if I was the only one listening. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavendermist Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Would you believe I got a reply....
And pretty quickly, too.
This is what he wrote:

thanks for writing. This is going to sound dumb but i didn't see the headline the editors put on my story.

Regarding the article, i was just trying to write a smarter "vacation" story than the times and the post. I'm a little mystified as to why that radio guy got angry at me for calling august a slow news month: of course i didn't intend to minimize the iraq war. I mentioned iraq and the rove investigation.

My point was that with congress out of session, it's easier for mr. Bush to dominate the news agenda, even if the "news" he provides isn't really news at all. Ms. Sheehan and people like her threaten to disrupt what has been a very comfortable situation for mr. Bush. I don't understand how this story could be considered pro-administration.

Of course i didn't mean ms. Sheehan any disrespect. I can only imagine the pain she feels. Maybe is should have said, "who describes herself as..."

I've gotten a lot of grief from conservatives for this story, by the way.

Best,
Chris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Nice job leepsy!
I'm surprised he responded at all! Your email to him was excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ekelly Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. "The coverage of Cindy Sheehan has been extraordinary."
????????????????????

Did I somehow miss all of this "extraodinary" coverage that Judd Legum speaks of?

I have not seen/heard any mention of Cindy on television.

If there is any, can someone please point me toward it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. The WSJ- at it again...
Edited on Wed Aug-10-05 07:45 PM by depakid
Oh well, Fox news in print I guess...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CONN Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. And who controls DU?
An earlier post on LBN "Jagger Says Song Not an Anti-Bush Tirade" was locked and moved to the DU Lounge (not a place I frequent).

Anyhow, the story is about the new Rolling Stones album with lyrics: "How come you're so wrong? My sweet neo-con, where's the money gone, in the Pentagon"

Jagger says: "It is certainly very critical of certain policies of the administration, but so what! Lots of people are critical"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/10/AR2005081000406_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. I see this headline and think "DUH!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh the propaganda.....PNAC is now blaming Bush for Cheney's
agenda, which is their agenda as well.

Bush may be guilty of quite a bit. However, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and probably most within the PNAC have been the ones to initiate the most heinous of crimes.

Bush is no more running the White House than you or I am.

What a propaganda joke. Don't look at the line. Look at what's BETWEEN it, or in this case, under it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC