Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: Leaving iraq Would Be a Bad Signal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:49 PM
Original message
Bush: Leaving iraq Would Be a Bad Signal
CRAWFORD, Texas -
President Bush said Thursday he understands and respects the views of anti-war advocates like a California mother camped outside his Texas ranch to mourn her soldier son fallen in
Iraq, but said it would be a mistake to bring U.S. troops home now.
ADVERTISEMENT

"I understand the anguish that some feel about the death that takes place," Bush said.

"I also have heard the voices of those saying: Pull out now," he said. "And I've thought about their cry and their sincere desire to reduce the loss of life by pulling our troops out. I just strongly disagree."

Immediate withdrawal "would send a terrible signal to the enemy."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050811/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush;_ylt=Aq_kZeoFK.pvc8UnqN6qB2ms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. The enemy to whom he refers is, of course, us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. He on now......
...not sure what he's babbling about now ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wish his father had listened........
to Babs when she told him to "pull out now". Then we wouldn't be stuck with this miserable cretin. :grr:

We've already sent a "terrible signal to the enemy". That signal being, 'we're waging a Crusade against Islam, we're not of sufficient strength to put down the "insurgency", and we won't listen to reason or work with the rest of the world to solve problems'. Yeah, we've already sent them a BIG message. We're stupid! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about an apology for having gotten us there.
in the first place. Doesn't Cindy Sheehan, don't we have a right to that at a minimum?

How about an admission from Bush that, yes, he fixed the intelligence to justify an unjust, illegal war?

How about taking responsibility for having mismanaged the war in any event?

How about coming clean about what is really going on in Iraq?

What a sorry excuse for a man -- a dishonest, cowardly, sneaky bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Exactly, an apology about the faulty justifications for this mess--what
about that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bad signal to the Oil Republicans who are getting rich on this
"What the hell, we only have about 2,000 deaths of US armed services personnel so far, and look at all the money we are making." - BushCo Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Their dollar to dead soldier ratio must be staggering..........
I'll bet they're making AT LEAST $5 million per dead soldier, and that's a VERY conservative estimate. They have to be VERY happy with a ratio like that, not that it would stand in their way if it was much lower, but those petro-dollars are pouring in.

I'd like to add the :sarcasm: emoticon here, but I'm afraid this is too close to the truth. They really don't care how many die as long as those Billions keep rolling in. Heartless, cold bastards, each and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. People getting blown up for no damn good reason is a bad signal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I just strongly disagree." There you go. End of story.
We ain't going nowhere (besides expanding the carnage into Iran).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did the Gargoyle say why he..
WON'T MEET WITH CINDY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think his news conference in on tape?
This is not live ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. This was on Yahoo just before the press conference
MSNBC said that they originally only had an audio tape of the press conference :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. That's what I heard too.....
I came in when the MSNBC *twinkie* was waiting for the *rewind*?

So the *press conference we saw today* was not LIVE?

:wtf: is right !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. "I just strongly disagree" is a "nobel cause?"
more mumbo jumbo from mealy mouth hisself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. only in bush's narcissistic, power-and-control-freak mind, only in his
greed for oil .... only there would it be a bad signal for bush to pull out of iraq now.

bush has not heard. if he had heard he would CONSIDER pulling out of iraq. HE is not eve doing that. He has gotten hold of the oval office and won't let go. He has gotten hold of Iraq and won't let go.

bush is a bastard!

.

The Bastard continues to play games with Casey Sheehan.

.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yah, I'm watching that shit fountain on msnbc
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 01:09 PM by EST
(Gagging and yelling a lot)
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does no one have the guts to ask him if he will speak with Ms. Sheehan?
None, so far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Guess What? We ain't leaving Iraq. We are NEVER leaving Iraq
Because it will ALWAYS send a terrible signal to an enemy that will ALWAYS be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. We have not "laid down a foundation for peace" but stirred up a sh*t storm
Dubya. And that is the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. "There's plenty more dying ta do!!' sez the serial murderer-in-chief
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. This really says it all
"I understand the anguish that some feel about the death that takes place," Bush said.

The word, some, is astonishing. It is stunning to me that he doesn't use the words, we all. Saying we all takes nothing away from the value of the war - say the sentences thinking WWII.

That he uses some, likely means he feels no anguish for the deaths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. He is making a veiled reference to Cindy I think.
They are clearly troubled about what is going on out there. He has no idea how stupid he sounds when he says stuff like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. not veiled--as he asked Are you referring to Mrs. Sheenen?--when a
reporter asked a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. I agree that it was intended as a condensending put down
minimizing her genuine, obvious grief.

The point I was making was that he is in affect imply that feeling anguish that a person has been killed is a feeling felt only by some. If he would have said, that we all feel anquish that people die in war, but it is necessary because ...., then he would be placing himself in the group of people who realize the realness of the sacrifice.

This is not even political - Can you imagine Reagan saying this? I would hope the norm is more similar to the looks of anguish on Kennedy's and Kerry's faces at the funeral they attended for a Massachucetts soldier. In one photo, Kerry looked near tears as he hugged and supported an older relative of the young man. That is the normal reaction in responding emotionally to a mother's grief. Bush doesn't even fake it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. "about the death that takes place"
The idiot is using the passive tense here to try and distance himself from the deaths he's directly responsible for - over 1800 American soldiers, hundreds more "coalition" troops and contractors, who knows how many Iraqis -- never mind the thousands maimed for life.

You are right. The use of the word "some" is the product of a sick mind. Who wouldn't feel anguish about death in a war, particularly an unnecessary war based on lies? Only the immoral, evil sons of bitches who started it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orion The Hunter Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Oh?
Did Bush peek out from under his bed to issue a statement? How brave of him...

It's easy to talk tough when you don't have the balls to stand in front of the people who's lives you are risking when you talk about a "bad signal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. We can never pull out of Germany, Italy and Japan either
It would send a bad signal to the Axis powers.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durablend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. You got it!
Hitler might come back from the dead and ATTACK!

TERRA TERRA TERRA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bufffbison Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. and what is that terrible signal???
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 01:48 PM by bufffbison
I also have heard the voices of those saying: 'Pull out now!' " he said. "And I've thought about their cry and their sincere desire to reduce the loss of life by pulling our troops out. I just strongly disagree."

ummm.. what the fuck? im not sure what point he is trying to get across? He only thinks about their "cry" but strongly disagree the soldiers should live.. thats the context i get from reading this!


Immediate withdrawal "would send a terrible signal to the enemy," the president said.

and what is that terrible signal? that we're ready for democracy to start in iraq and peace for the people? ending the violence? is that signal too terrible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. N_G_U, You may want to change the topic for this story
To reference Commander Boob's statement about "respect" for people like Cindy Sheehan. That's the really the more salient (read: nauseating) part of the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. And she needs to respond:
"I understand the greed that drives the policies of this admninistration, and I strongly disagree."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
29. And the Shrub

administration has just been billowing good signals.

I can't believe this man is our President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. Not the enemy. What he meant to say was...
Immediate withdrawal "would send a terrible signal to the the bushco stockholders."

Can you just imagine how much money will be lost when Bushco and their slavish supporters finally realize they've really, really lost?

I'm not sure I want to be there for the meltdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. bad signal to whom, asshole*?
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 03:10 PM by Javaman
If it's us, well just to damn bad. It would just be such a pity to have the soldiers home and not dismembered, blown to pieces or shot.

:sarcasm:

If it's the Iraqi's, I certainly don't get that one. They want us the fuck out of there, it's only the puppet gov't that wants us there to protect their sorry crooked fucking asses.

Hey moron*, fuck you! send your goddamn twins!!

colossal failure*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. so much for not being driven by others' perceptions
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 03:40 PM by SlavesandBulldozers
i find it very telling that he ignores what a citizen thinks and listens to the terrorists.

i mean, does he push-poll the terrorists or something, and then act accordingly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Sending the Wrong Signal
Pulling out of Iraq 'sends wrong signal' according to *

http://breakingnews.iol.ie/news/story.asp?j=152296908&p=y5zz976y4

What signal does torture send? What signal does violating the spirit, intent, and word of the Constitution of the United States?
Raise your hand if you are tired of the usurper talking about the wrong signal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. What signal does lying send? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. It took them years to get out of Vietnam for exactly the same reason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bush: Leaving Iraq Would Be a Bad Signal
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 04:24 PM by norml
Bush: Leaving Iraq Would Be a Bad Signal
By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 49 minutes ago



CRAWFORD, Texas - President Bush said Thursday he understands and respects the views of anti-war advocates like a California mother camped outside his Texas ranch to mourn her soldier son fallen in Iraq, but said it would be a mistake to bring U.S. troops home now.

"I understand the anguish that some feel about the death that takes place," Bush said.

"I also have heard the voices of those saying: 'Pull out now!' " he said. "And I've thought about their cry and their sincere desire to reduce the loss of life by pulling our troops out. I just strongly disagree."

Immediate withdrawal "would send a terrible signal to the enemy," the president said.


snip


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050811/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Well, sure. No one he loves is gonna die in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Too bad Poppy
didn't heed the voices to "pull out now" about 60 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theshadow Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Or as George Carlin said in his stand-up during Viet Nam....
...(posing as Nixon), "Pull out early? Doesn't sound manly!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. We are way past "terrible signals" Dub.
The signals don't mean shit right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep CHOICES legal Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. They are just testing their "verbal" spin.


Bush & Co will be spinning all kinds of phrases this month to see which ones are accepted by the American people. Right now, they are saying that "immediate withdrawal would send a terrible signal," at the same time, they are saying that there is the possibility that troops can start withdrawal in the Spring...and/or Summer of next year. (Of course they don't mention that they have to do SOME withdrawals because of the election in Nov 2006!...which is the real reason) They are just tap dancing around verbal exchanges instead of actually addressing the issue of withdrawal sincerely and honestly.

(Watch out for the spin phrase of the week from Republicans...."cultural elites" which is always used in the same paragraph as "Democrat" or "Liberal". They are hoping to use this phrase to promote ANY wedge issue before the next election. I think the Democrats should start referring to the Republicans as the "BULLY elites" to counteract their accusations. You know the party that has to push people around and intimidate them to get their own way...Bush administration, John Bolton, oil companies, business executives, corpations that outsource, etc.)

Testing...1...2...3..testing...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Personally, I embrace 'cultural elite".
If, as the right often claims, most of the most educated (higher education teachers) and most informed (reporters) are liberal, what does that say for liberalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep CHOICES legal Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. It's so difficult to get into a Rove mindset.
I understand what you are saying.

I'm thinking that Rove has to find a way to appeal to Bush's base. There are some Republicans, who have never been at "the head of the class." They like the feeling of power that being a Bush supporter gives them. They have never been in this situation before, and they like it. To them, their only threat to take this power away from them and dethrone Bush...would be the opposition...the "cultural elite". That is the phrase that I think Rove is promoting to rally some of Bush's intellectually-disinterested supporters.

LOGICAL THINKING is not part of THEIR mental circuitry. I'm sorry,.... but they are dumb, and easy to manipulate. The phrase "cultural elite" will scare them. Rove knows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Who's afraid of the big bad signal, big bad signal, big bad signal.
Who's afraid of the big bad signal -- hundreds more deaths are preferable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I thought that going in there was a bad signal.
Who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
47. The bad signal is the political doom of military defeat
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 06:02 PM by teryang
Nothing fails like a military failure. Haven't heard much of that world's only superpower bragging lately, have we?

How about, these "insurgent attacks have no tactical significance?"

This folly in Iraq, in fact the entire bloated military program run exclusively for the benefit the defense contractors, oil companies, and other have more blowhards is accelerating the strategic decline of our nation. The export of our industrial sector by the mavens of the financial dictatorship has already ruined us. The damage is probably irreversible in political and economic terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
48. SIGNAL?!
I want my neighbors back, I don't care what kind of "signal" that sends to anyone. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. the "sending a terrible signal" part happened when we invaded, bush.
it's a little late to start talking "terrible signals" when everything about this illegal invasion has been a terrible signal to everyone on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
51. What an asshat
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 07:17 PM by sakabatou
"I understand the anguish that some feel about the death that takes place," Bush said.

The why don't you fucking go out and talk to Cindy? Is it that fucking hard, Bush? Is it?! You have time to sign some new documents for the highway, but you don't have time from this mother of a fallen soldier? WTF?!

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maggie_May Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
53. Yea signal
Look at the signal he sent to the Iraq people.
We come in destroy your homes kill your people and take over your oil.
I would fight too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'll bet impeaching Bush and his handlers would be a really bad signal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
55. Yeah. That's a great reason to throw away more lives. (sarcasm)
It's much more important to make sure that we don't send a bad signal. :sarcasm: :grr: :banghead: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. "...This is the psychology of a badly damaged adolescent,
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 08:16 PM by rocknation
one who believes that admitting even a single mistake reveals that you’re not 'strong' and that you’re not a 'real man.' 'Staying the course,' even if all the evidence indisputably proves that the course will lead to nothing but destruction and failure, is the measure of one’s 'strength'—-and altering one’s direction, when every sign indicates that is the only sane action to take, reveals 'weakness.'

This is the psychology of a man whose self-esteem is tied to his belief that he is always right in every decision—-not that his method is correct, which is where a man of genuine self-esteem will ground his self-worth (since all of us will make errors...), but that he is right in each specific decision he makes. For such a man to admit...(to)...disastrous and calamitous error would be an admission that he himself is a failure.

...There is only one possible healthy reaction...you should be very, very afraid. I certainly am."

From The Light Of Reason

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
57. "Stay the Course!" "Thousand points of Light!" "I'm the War President!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC