Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-Illegal Immigration Group's Forum Plan Foiled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:48 AM
Original message
Anti-Illegal Immigration Group's Forum Plan Foiled
Concerns over racism thwart Save Our State's effort to find allies in the black community.

By Lisa Richardson, Times Staff Writer


Save Our State, the in-your-face anti-illegal immigration group, was thrilled. Its long-held desire to forge ties to the black community was at last to be realized.

Invited to speak to a black community forum in Leimert Park this month, SOS founder Joseph Turner was sure that by the time he finished expressing his outrage about the impact of illegal immigration on jobs, schools and neighborhoods, Save Our State would have new, equally outraged allies.

But it was not to be. Turner's invitation was rescinded shortly after it became public. The story of how and why that happened says much about how heated the debate over immigration policy has become in black communities in Southern California and how much the tone of that debate has discomfited many black leaders.

For Turner, the chance to speak at the Urban Policy Roundtable, a forum run by the political analyst Earl Ofari Hutchinson, would have been a coup on several fronts: Save Our State would expand its geographical reach into South-Central; an infusion of black activism around illegal immigration would force elected officials to take heed; and with blacks on board, SOS could, perhaps, rid itself of persistent allegations of racism.

But no sooner did Turner post a euphoric message online announcing the meeting than opposition mobilized against it.

Hutchinson's group has become an influential forum in South Los Angeles. Politicians and school officials make it a first stop when reaching out to blacks. Pro-immigration groups were outraged that Turner might gain such a well-known platform, and they were determined to stop him.

They vowed to protest. Hutchinson was bombarded with angry e-mail. A liberal advocacy group sent him a five-page letter of "concerns" outlining what it called Save Our State's "violent, hateful, racist actions." Hutchinson invited immigration advocates to present their side at the meeting, but none would share the podium with Turner.

Hutchinson, who said he had barely heard of SOS when Turner asked to come to the group, began to have second thoughts. He perused the SOS website and says he was repelled. He decided to withdraw the invitation.

One statement on the website, in particular, has stayed with him. It reads:

"Aren't you tired of watching your state turn into a Third World cesspool right before your eyes?"

"That is calling people of color scum and garbage," he said. "You essentially are calling me that, too. I think there is a racist tinge."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/state/la-me-sos12aug12,1,5856942.story?coll=la-news-state

...........

Bigots forget own immigrant roots

August 12, 2005

BY ANDREW GREELEY
Immigrants with dark skin play the same role in contemporary American life as Jews did in Germany in the 1930s and blacks did in this country in the same decade when, if they were uppity, they were lynched. The three pariah groups are different, of course, and the extent of harm imposed on them are different -- and the Holocaust is absolutely unique in its horror and its evil -- but the same underlying dynamisms are at work. Their enemies deprived them of their full humanity. They are not really human beings, they are vermin, the society is better off without them. They don't have the rights that other, fully human people have.



You can be viciously cruel to people only when you have dehumanized them. It's all right to push Jews into gas chambers, because they are not like the rest of us. It's all right to lynch a black person because he is not completely human, it's all right to hunt down immigrants and get rid of them, because they are really not Americans and do not have the human rights of other Americans. Once you have deprived the other of their full humanity then anything goes.

All right, we do not set up gas chambers of illegal immigrants. We arrest them in the middle of the night, we break up their families, sometimes permanently, we punish them arbitrarily without any regard for due processes. Moreover, when the feds do these things, there is little outcry from the American people because government agents are enforcing the law, are they not? Almost three quarters of Americans would like to gather up all the illegal immigrants and send them back where they came from.

http://www.suntimes.com/output/greeley/cst-edt-greel12.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Racist fringe? see my sig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great job hammering these white supremacists
Please keep at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. AlphaCentauri
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
63. oops sorry n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Racist rhetoric
Ya know, the more people scream "racist" in order to ignore this very real problem, the more those Republicans are going to win in 2006.

Blacks are the second largest minority group to have financial consequences due to illegal immigration. The 1st is Hispanics.

Again, illegal DOES NOT EQUAL legal and it especially does not equal legal in terms of labor economics.

I don't know who this group is but the statistics are real on the effects illegal aliens are having to the labor economy. Using the race card to ignore this problem, plus try to confuse the issue
by not using the term ILLEGAL when discussing this, as if it's equal to legal immigration (IT IS NOT!) is about as bad
as those idiot freepers claiming stem cells = babies.

It's a red herring and by doing emotional rhetoric drive, so all concerned are terrified of being called racists, the Democrats will never come up with a sane and just solution that actually stops illegal immigration and they will lose in 2006. 80% of all Americans want something done and the number one consensus point is to secure the border.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. when you start bitchin' as loudly about "illegal employers"...
as you do about "illegal immigrants" i'll stop calling you a racist.
(using "you" in the group sense, not the personal sense)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. aha, guess which favorite racist is stressing this point
Tancredo! Crazy Tancredo has been pushing hard to punish employers for breaking the law...seriously. While I am not thrilled about the messenger, I read the message and this is one of the things he's doing that is excellent.

and don't even imply racism towards me...I'm a bleeding heart liberal
intensive, social mobility all the way, affirmative action all of the way, social justice 100%... and the problem with illegal immigration comes to labor economics as well as global policies that create such poverty in other nations(NAFTA, CAFTA) and so forth.

Few realize how large a factor immigration policy is in labor economics...what does that mean?...-it means the mechanics on how citizens/legal residences of a nation-state keep a middle class standard of living..
so what's going on will drag all workers to the "race to the bottom" from labor economics 101 knowledge.

But, I do know there are racists involved, I monitor some of these groups, it's true and it pisses me off for the issues are getting confused.

Democrats needs to just bite the bullet, deal with this highly heated emotional rhetoric and counter/work with those Republicans to create a sane policy that does not give multinational corporations
their cheap labor supply that by-passes national labor law, yet has justice, fair play and also enforces the law. (no deportation, blanket, no amnesty blanket, case by case basis).

Democrats are not doing anything but putting forth what multinational corporations and cheap labor business people and others feeding off of illegal immigration want right now and from the liberal blogs we have a lot of effort to scream "racist" the minute this issue is brought up with absolutely no sanity or even realization of what it all means economically and why it's important economically and for labor rights.

The only reason you have the AFL-CIO saying amnesty is they believe they can unionize all of those workers who were in fact used to bust the AFL-CIO unions in the 80's, 90's, 00's. I question that, but this is their reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. the fact remains...
if you solve the employer problem by viciously enforcing existing laws, imprisoning the perpetrators and fining the companies into bankruptcy...you will solve the immigraton problem without having to put a single man at the border, without imprisoning a single person for attemting to feed their family, without having to erode or deny the civil liberties of all persons, etc

and as for the afl-cio, one needs only to look at their involvement with the NED/CIA in central/south america to see what is going on. and that comes from a 20 yr+ union/afl-cio member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. hmmm the NED/CIA rumored affair
sure seems counter to their illegal immigration position.

I've read this documentation and it's not clear if it's a fabrication or not. If it's real, then whatever "right wingnut" is in power in the AFL-CIO should get kicked out.

I think you must secure the border no matter what and I also think
when people are completely desperate, which they are, without addressing
raising the PPI of other nations (Mexico) and creating a middle class,
this problem will not stop.

But, I agree, prosecute employers 100% and a huge percentage of this problem does go away. Illegals come because it's no problem to get a job and seemingly fake social security numbers work better than real ones financially! (you can do under the table, use two different IDs and all sorts of gaming the system since they are just taking false ids and false identities...makes me want to give it a whirl the deal is so juicy).

When you say "imprison" you still will have to deport under your assumptions..if anything to just make sure those leaving are not risking their lives by illegally crossing the border again.. unless you wish for that person to starve and beg on the streets since they will not longer be able to feed their family in the US.

I have yet to see any proposal from any group wishing to "imprision"
illegal aliens. I've seen a lot to deport everybody, which I think is nuts. It's 20M people. Blanket amnesty is also nuts.


I also think not addressing the growing income inequality in Mexcio, S. Am. and C. Am (plus here too!) and raising the PPI there will still be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. "..makes me want to give it a whirl the deal is so juicy"
What the hell are you talking about? Picking lettuce in the burning sun at $10 a day is a juicy deal???? Jeez, they had to fight for clean water and the right to not be sprayed with pesticides! Not only that, they cannot go to the doctor or complain about horrid working conditions because they worry about deportation.

Juicy...yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. no shit (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. underground economy is juicy
work under the table, cash, usually about minimum wage, no taxes.

Get a fake SS, get social services and the one that is juicy..Medicaid.

Get assistance in buying a home, again via a TAX ID number.

If you're working for 10 bucks an hour as a legal resident...this is much more total benefits and income.

clean water and the fight not to be sprayed with pesticides is NOT
ILLEGAL immigration..
whole other ball game and was about labor rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Do you ANY proof? You are just making claims that the right
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 02:45 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
uses, ala "welfare queens".

Where are all these hordes poor people living in mansions with wads of money at their disposal? Because I sure as hell have never seen them. In fact, they only seem to exist as figments of the RW's imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Wall Street Journal
http://www.wsjclassroomedition.com/archive/05apr/econ_underground.htm

I swear to god, you guys have brain block on this issue.

There are many studies on the underground economy.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
60. You mean the news rag that also supported Bush?
Next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. How about some support for your claims?
There have been several articles posted right here showing that illegal immigrants are responsible for a SURPLUS social security fund which far outweighs their 'cost' to social services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. put them here again.
Borjas is a world leading economist, focus labor economics.
http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~GBorjas/Papers/cis504.pdf

Also, two economists from Columbia U
http://www.columbia.edu/~drd28/Migration.pdf

then in terms of social security, here's one straight from the horse's mouth, the US accounting office that says, nope, deficit:

http://www.gao.gov/highlights/d03993high.pdf


All of these are extremely credible sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. the only people imprisoned per my post are the EMPLOYERS...
not the VICTIMS of policies enacted by a corrupt u.s. foreign policy that ENSURES there is no middle class in these countries.

And yeah, you go ahead and give that juicy deal a whirl...let me know how it works out for ya'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It is racist! There is a reason that violence is up against Hispanics
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 12:51 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Specifically hate crimes.

People hide behind the "illegal immigration" crap and hate ALL mexicans. People see a person with dark skin and they think "I wonder if he's an illegal"... Do you look at a white person and think "I wonder if he's an illegal" He very well might be!

Please. There are plenty of people rallying around this fucking bigots. They are certainly not terrified about being called racists. You can't pretend that hatred against all Mexicans is not rising. You read the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. absurd
One of the leading labor economics experts happens to be a LEGAL
Cuban immigrant. Another expert is Indian.

Please don't post information that is invalid, that is simply an absurd accusation that has no basis in reality.

I have seen no article, no information anywhere about increases in hate crimes against those of "brown skin".

Hispanics and blacks are the two minorities hurt most economically by ILLEGAL, which is NOT LEGAL immigration.

Are you saying those brown skinned people and black skinned people HATE themselves? I think not!

I have seen articles about hate crimes increasing against those of the Muslim religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ok, here is the article for you.
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 01:05 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
http://tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050731/NEWS01/507310375/1006/NEWS


Now you have read the article. Look it up.

And I posted no inaccurate information. You, however, have yet to post any corraboration of anything you have said.

And why do you apparently believe that all dark colored people band together? for your other point, show me an anti-illegals rally held by MEXICANS and then we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. give me a break that's the KKK!
that isn't ALL who are discussing illegal immigration.

God. The Southern Poverty Law Center??? Christ, talk about a not credible source. They are a front for cheap labor...constantly
releasing not factual information.

I don't care about their position but they have been repeatedly exposed for releasing information that is not factual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. FYI, the Southern Poverty Law Center is held in high esteem by most DUers
I don't appreciate you badmouthing them. They've been in the trenches fighting racism and hate crimes for decades. I immediately mistrust anyone who belittles what they've done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. sorry facts are facts
and I'm a major "Duer" here and have been so for a long time.

I have seen others point out there false reports and studies on DU.

You want credibility, don't put out false stories or information that
cannot be verified...they have repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. lol, you haven't provided a SINGLE fact. Just a lot of RW talking points
The major enemy of the Southern Law Poverty Center is FAIR, one of the most hateful RW groups on the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. sorry they do
They go on period rant attacks on politicians...probably is there is no evidence to back up their claims.

Any academic knows this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. And yet you have no evidence other than Rangerdude and Wikipedia
Which links to FR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. one thing this does point out
illegal status means they will not report crimes.

This is very true and happens more than people realize in the workplace.

OSHA rules do not apply and there have been stories where a day laborer illegal alien has died on the job and the employer literally dumps the body back at on the street or at the hospital and drives off in a hurry.

Employer by-pass worker rights, safety laws, 8 hour work day laws, break laws and so forth and an illegal cannot do anything about it since they are illegal.

I don't have a reference offhand, but I read somewhere (credible study) that illegal aliens had a much greater worker injuiry and death rate that legal residents/US citizens.

I still say it's absurd to equate the racist KKK with 80% of all Americans who want something done and yesterday...

but this is a real problem. Illegal aliens have also been used heavily to union bust, especially in meat packing, hotels and construction.

That's why amnesty is preferable to "guest worker" visas, which are under the control of the corporation, which means the worker is under complete control of the corporation and employment laws can be by-passed...for if the minute the corporation decides they don't want the worker (say the worker complains on any valid employment law issue)...they are deported out of the country. Just as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. So you say the Southern Law Poverty Center is a front for cheap labor
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 02:44 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Right...and ACLU is just a front for the horrible gay agenda. :eyes:

Do you have any evidence for what you say? Or like everying else you posted do we just have to take your word for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. here is an overview article, plus another
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center

And another reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Cberlet_&_Willmcw

shows that they violate Wikipedia's rules of reliable sources..
plese note this article is showing violations of both groups, racists
and the Southern Law Poverty center for publishing unreliable sources.

As repeatedly stated, if one does not examine this logically and stop
the absurd heating rhetoric, multinationals will win absolute.

And right now they are and this "racist" number is helping them out (multinational corporations) greatly in their qwest for "unlimited worker movement" and erosion of nation-states or any sense of labors/unions and workers rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
59. lol your source is some guy named "Rangerdude"
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 10:47 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
LOL! You are cracking me up!

That wikipedia source, the first one, says nothing about SLPC being a front for cheap labor OR that it publishes suspect material.

Second...wikipedia? There was an article saying wikipedia itself is so polluted with false information it is embarrassing. They link to Free Republic for crying out loud!

Lol...rangerdude...

On Edit: Here is the article!

http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2005/01/04/academia_and_wikipedia.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. edit: he answered
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 01:34 PM by ret5hd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. ALL CUBAN IMMIGRANTS ARE LEGAL...per wet foot/dry foot
why don't we give every immigrant the same deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. here's another valid complaint
one is just sheer numbers, there just are not that many Cubans...
but this is a valid issue. I believe the immigration quota from Mexico is extremely low.

Canada has a way more sane policy in that it uses a set of criteria
versus "body count" numbers. I think that's way more fair. Their criteria are things like ability to earn a living, education, criminal history, do you have a job lined up and so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old sixties guy Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
71. If those were Swedes or Brits
Coming across the border most of these anti-immigrant groups would have no problem with"their kind"coming into the US.Its anti-Latino sentiment that motivates these xenophobes.I saw it growing up in California where slurs against"spics"and "wetbacks"were as common as similiar tirades against African Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leodem Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. I agree with you....
The problem is getting worse and worse. I am not a far left liberal but I am liberal and I am anti-illegal immigration. This issue has become more of a focus for me especially since I moved to Miami.

Hell, you could go up and down Lincoln Rd. in Miami Beach and probably get $500,000 worth of fines for businesses hiring illegals. The businesses should be hit hard and then the illegals should be dealt with as well.

I don't like it when people say "well these illegals do the jobs most people don't want to do.". If it came down to it and I had to take a job cleaning bathrooms to survive I would. I've done plenty of shit jobs to get by that I didn't want to do but I had to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Ever pick lettuce
for $10 a day? How about working on a roofing crew for $25 a day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. guess what roofing used to pay 17/hr!
You know the reason it pays 25 bucks a day...illegal aliens and union busting.

Try being a construction worker with a family and a mortage. Your skilled labor crane operator job just went from 34/hr to 6.85 due to use of under the table labor to union bust your group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leodem Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Exactly...
My friend did a part time roofing job getting $100 a day and that was just for clean up/basic labor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. How about a link
to support your claim that minorities suffer financial consequences from illegal immigration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. reference
For example,
the immigrant influx that entered the country between
1980 and 2000 lowered the wage by 7.4 percent for
high school dropouts, by 3.6 percent for college graduates,
and by around 2 percent for both high school
graduates and workers with some college. Of course,
the impact is much larger for some specific experience
groups within each educational category. Similarly, although
this immigrant influx lowered the wages of white
native workers by 3.5 percent, it lowered the wage of
native-born blacks by 4.5 percent, and of native-born
Hispanics by 5 percent.
It seems that Paul Samuelson was right after
all: Wages fall when immigrants increase the size of the
workforce.

http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~GBorjas/Papers/cis504.pdf

please note this is specific to illegal immigration on legal I believe Borjas came up with a very small overall net gain.

Dr. Borjas is a Harvard economist who focuses in on labor economics:

http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~GBorjas/publications_for_download.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #45
62. Oh please, Borjas is riddled with controversy
But oh no! He must be right because he is brown and he went to Harvard! :eyes:

How can you not see the racism? Let's see...we have one headliner Cuban and one Chinese woman and the rest are all whites leading the charge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. sorry he is considered
the world leading expert on labor economics. There are also other professors listed.

Let me know when you wish to discuss the facts and go from there.

I cannot argue with people in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. Nope, you listed him, Wall street journal and RangerDude.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 06:56 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
And by whom is considered an expert? Some people consider Bill O Reilly an expert.

You keep making assertions and not backing them up. Then you blow off any one against you as being absurd.

I would make a safe guess that you are not Mexican...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Use the full name: North American Minuteman Border Legionaires Association
Use the full name: North American Minuteman Border Legionaires Association (NAMBLA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. "...I think there is a racist tinge."
One statement on the website, in particular, has stayed with him. It reads:

"Aren't you tired of watching your state turn into a Third World cesspool right before your eyes?"

"That is calling people of color scum and garbage," he said. "You essentially are calling me that, too. I think there is a racist tinge."


Ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. Clearly the Next Wedge Issue
WingNuts abound salivating at the thought of spikeing this wedge issue deeply between the Democratic faithful. Heck these articals are probably a series of trial ballons to formulate plans for the upcoming elections.

If we don't get our collective heads on straight how to calmly FRAME this issue correctly we are going to be licking our wounds again here shortly.


TAX CHEATING EMPLOYERS

Simple..

you take away the jobs they stop coming period end of issue. and while were at it why not point out the welfare dependent employers at the same time. WALMART Already caught red-handed hiering illigal immigrant workers to make an extra buck but that isn't going far enough.

How about all the folks they deny health care with their employment policies. They end up on tax subsidiezed healthcare programs. So basicly John E. Tax-payer is forced to subsidize WALMART's corp. greed through the Right Wing's refusal to close loop holes in the tax code
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. closing the borders is not racist
illegals are flooding the country, ruining our standard of living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. racist is just a way to avoid the issue
and it confuses people, especially on the liberal front.

Liberals need to get on this issue for it very much affects working
people and their rights in the United States.

There is a HUGE movement by multinational corporations for two things:
1. unlimited movement of workers
2. putting immigration status into the WTO, GATS mode 4, which means
nation-states can no longer control who enters and doesn't the country.

Both of these are for labor arbitrage primarily (lowing of all workers wages) plus union busting and reduction of workers rights.

This "racist" red herring I find incredibly naive and dangerous for liberals (who I am assuming want equality and a large middle class) aren't tackling this issue and thus workers are vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Liberals are NOT going to get on an issue
when its proponents spew RW talking points, advocate racism and quote the Wall Street Journal as a reliable source while criticizing the Southern Poverty Law Center.

This is the wrong board for those views. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. see, resort to name calling when the facts are presented n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. You are not presenting facts!
You are presenting links to RW media and racist web sites!

Here - I will spell it out for you:

The Wall Street Journal is about as far right as you can get in our media. This publication is to print media what Faux News is to TV news channels.

F.A.I.R. is one of the most racist anti-immigration organizations in our society today. Its members have a lot of views in common with the KKK.

The website on your sig line includes links to the same racist anti-minority sites I have seen posted on CU and FR. A simple click on that link told me all I needed to know about your agenda.

No Sir, you are NOT presenting facts; you are presenting one sided and very misguided opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. they are FACTS
I'm sorry but Harvard economists and the Wall Street Journal are credible sources.

Clearly there is some sort of issue that isn't my problem with you to not be able to accept credible research and multiple sources on articles and academic study.

I suspect you would have a difficult time in college if you wish to continue arguing that 1 + 1 doesn't equal two simply because you do not like the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. You are out of line
There is nothing racist from our group or I. This sort of accusation is precisely the insane obfuscation of a important labor issue
that I resent greatly.

We are an activist group for issues relating to economics and a strong middle class.

Social mobility, socialism have absolutely nothing to do with racism
and we are not even a majority of white people.

So your rhetoric exposes the attempt to dismiss this issue through insult and does not hold water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. They most certainly are not
ruining our standard of living. Talk about racist rhetoric!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. be informed
There are some credible studies that say yes it is and it's clear
why to me at least...
it's labor economics 101...
it's not "ruining" our standard of living but it is lowering it.

I wish people would just stop with the rhetoric and look at the facts.

Wasn't it FDR who said one looks at the facts and try something and if the results say it doesn't work you try something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. What studies?
Talk about rhetoric. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. they are listed on this post, you are not bothering to read them n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. You haven't listed any credible studies!
Wall Street Journal articles and links to F.A.I.R.??

You're kidding, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Again, wall street journal and Harvard economists are credible n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #57
68. LOL I am sure they are
in your world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. you're not addressing his questions, though

You're just shouting him down and calling him names.

He does have some legitimate questions....like how are we going to solve this problem.

For example, he mentioned amnesty and no one took him up on that.

This isn't the way to solve problems or to persuade someone of whatever valid points you may have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. exactly
When one can have a realistic discussion on this issue, versus this "spamming" of this topic, with acknowledgement of the facts...

then liberals can start putting together a policy that is just
and also enhances the middle class. Over and over I point out that immigration policy is a major factor in wages and standard of living for workers who are here. It's supply and demand, econ 101.

Impossible with anyone who even mentions this topic or the facts
being called names and deragatory comments.

BTW: right now I lean on a case by case basis with uniform criteria
...more "earned" citizenship for illegal aliens. This is more in line with Canada's immigration policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Almost quoting from Borjas himself.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 06:55 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
:eyes:

The issue isn't what effect illegal labor has. It is the fact that you and others like you are refusing to acknowledge the racism that is going hand in hand with the "reform" But go ahead and deny deny deny. Yeah, it's alll about reform.

EVERYTHING bad with the economy is being blamed on illegals. Why do you think that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. You are arguing at air
And the good news is other posters understand the tactic from their posts. I do too and I find it sad. One will never find any sort of policy formulation by attacking people who raise this issue or discuss the facts of the current situation.

Borjas is a labor economics expert. He is a professor at Harvard. I am not aware, from any economist study that economic issues are being "blamed" on illegals.

There is no blame in the facts, but wise policy can be crafted if one actually pays attention to the facts. Unbiased studies do not blame, they report the current situation.

Why do you bother to continue to post? You are not presenting any policy, any economic study, any theory..anything except this bizarre
"spam" like replies that say nothing or add nothing to the topic.

Do you believe that by doing this you somehow change reality?

Do you honestly believe that by trying to discredit world leading economists with their research you can change the facts of the situation?

Who are "people like me?" What is it you believe I am suggesting?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #58
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. I just wish that anyone could live anywhere in the world that they want.
You might see a lot of people bolting this place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. You got that right.....
...Europe, Canada, New Zealand, take a pick. I would bolt tomorrow if I was financially able to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC