...since none of them read it before they clambered over each other to vote for it (Feingold excepted).
<snip from Feingold's address given October 12, 2001, to the Associated Press Managing Editors Conference at the Milwaukee Art Museum, explaining why he voted against the Act>
Even as America addresses the demanding security challenges before us, we must strive mightily also to guard our values and basic rights. We must guard against racism and ethnic discrimination against people of Arab and South Asian origin and those who are Muslim.
We who don’t have Arabic names or don’t wear turbans or headscarves may not feel the weight of these times as much as Americans from the Middle East and South Asia do. But as the great jurist Learned Hand said in a speech in New York’s Central Park during World War II: “
he spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the minds of other men and women; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which weighs their interests alongside its own without bias . . . .”
</snip>
The entire address can be found at http://www.archipelago.org/vol6-2/feingold.htm.
s_m
P.S. I realize this is off-topic, but I just happened to be reading it when I saw this post about taking a class to educate the Senators. Yes! It's about time they became educated about the matters on which they cast critical votes! What an idea! (It will never fly. *sigh*)