Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Fuel Economy Plan Is Seen Omitting Rule for Big S.U.V.'s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:48 PM
Original message
NYT: Fuel Economy Plan Is Seen Omitting Rule for Big S.U.V.'s
Fuel Economy Plan Is Seen Omitting Rule for Big S.U.V.'s
By DANNY HAKIM
Published: August 16, 2005


DETROIT, Aug. 15 - The Bush administration is expected to abandon a proposal to extend fuel economy regulations to include Hummer H2's and other huge sport utility vehicles, auto industry and other officials say.

The proposal was among a number of potential strategies outlined by the administration in 2003 to overhaul mileage requirements for light trucks - sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks and minivans. It had been seen by industry officials as likely to be adopted.

But the impact of the tougher requirements would have been borne almost solely by the increasingly troubled domestic auto industry, a concern for the administration.

Its broad plan to overhaul the light-truck mileage rules would change the regulatory system from one using averaged mileage for an automaker's entire annual light-truck output to one that sets up five or six classes, determined by a vehicle's size.

The rules, the first major rewriting of fuel economy standards since they were created in the 1970's, will be released late this month. They are sure to renew vigorous debate about the nation's dependence on foreign oil, a matter underlined by rapidly rising oil and gas prices....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/16/business/16fuel.html?hp&ex=1124164800&en=617b550c98441bc6&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pretty much screws any reasonable plan to reduce oil imports
But $5 a gallon gas will make most of those SUV's storage sheds.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why do they think more fuel efficient cars/trucks
would HURT the auto industry. Toyota has said it will increase production of hybrids to 25% (for the American market) because the sales are so much better than they ever expected. So why does Detroit claim it would hurt them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think because of the huge benefit costs that US automakers have,
they can only make big profits with the more expensive gas guzzlers. Japanese automakers don't have the huge pension and medical costs that US firms have because those costs are incurred by the country versus the automakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's the argument for a government run, single payer system. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'll say, but I don't think it will happen in the next few decades
There's still too many people who have decent enough benefits through their jobs that it's not feasible yet. That tipping point hasn't been reached where people are screaming about benefits or lack thereof like they are screaming about gas increases at the pump. To me the health/pension issue is far more important than the gas pump increases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. But employers are cutting health benefits subtley
1. Have to be on the paytoll longer to be eligible.
2. Higher premiums.
3. Higher co-pays.
4. Higher deductibles.
5. Elimination of Medi-Gap for retirees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "NIH" = "Not Invented Here" - Pandemic In the US Auto Industry NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Auto manufacturers
make alot more profit per unit on Hummers than on Grand Ams. The only problem is you'd have to be out of your f*cking mind to buy a Hummer with $2.60 gasoline and climbing. It's not 1972 anymore. It's not even 2002 anymore. Detroit better wake the f*ck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think their whole cost structure of building a car is so
conceptually different than the Japanese that they don't know how to get around it, if indeed they can. If GM can make a great Toyota Corolla at the same price as the Japanese, GM still has to tack on its enormous medical insurance costs for its employees and pensioners and the Japanese don't. I think I read somewhere it was about a thousand or more bucks per vehicle to pay the benefits costs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, they are fighting uphill because of that
IMO they need to shed those union contracts to be competitive. There is little reason they couldn't do exactly what the Japanese are doing in this country with manufacturing cars if they can do that. But to the point - it won't help them to make Hummers that no one wants to buy. You know it's bad when they are advertising BELOW employee pricing! They better start thinking about a future with high gas prices or those CEOs are going to be burning those Hummers to keep warm in the winter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Macomb County "Reagan Democrats" Argument
But the impact of the tougher requirements would have been borne almost solely by the increasingly troubled domestic auto industry, a concern for the administration.


The argument goes like this - if we in any way seek to either
    1) Limit SUV sales, or
    2) Increase SUV fuel economy, or
    3) Raise CAFE (corporate average fuel economy)
the SUV buyers will abandon Detroit and buy imported SUVs.

The fallacies:
    1) Detroit makes the biggest, most gas guzzling SUVs,
    2) Detroit makes, roughly, the same size-weight-mileage range of SUVs as foreign manufacturers.
    3) So, what are they going to buy?????
Who and what are we talking about here?
    1) Macomb County "Reagan Democrats"
    2) Who fled Detroit after the first school buses began to roll,
    3) With the mind set of their brothers who


The devil with them!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, it doesn't matter as much as it used to
people aren't buying nearly as many these days - otherwise they wouldn't have made the H3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. So does this help at all?
Hummer is the poster child for bad mpg vehicles. This is like trying to round up all the terrorists and ignoring Osama bin Ladin. . . . . . . . . . huh, anyone else see a pattern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Extremely mixed feelings
I don't want to see any more American workers lose their jobs to imports or workers of other countries. The people losing the jobs have nothing to do with designing the cars and making the marketing decisions, they are the factory workers depending on those paychecks to feed their families and need every penny they get..At the same time WE HAVE TO GET THESE DAMNED GUZZLERS OFF THE ROADS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, if the "increasingly troubled domestic auto industry" got a clue . .
and stopped building GIGANTIC FUEL-SWILLING SHITWAGONS, then maybe they wouldn't be in the dire financial staits in which they find themselves.

Oh, but that would be way too obvious, wouldn't it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think I just figured out what the 'Noble Cause' is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. the irony is they're killing the outdoors theSUVs are
supposedly made for, although i realise that 90% or more are just glorified station wagons for guys whose penises are too small for them to feel comfortable being seen driving a regular sw or minivan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Um...
"the impact of the tougher requirements would have been borne almost solely by the increasingly troubled domestic auto industry"

Only because these companies have made such short-sighted over the last two decades.

Typical Bush move. Reward incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iam Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. Levy
tariffs. Or institute a single-payer health insurance plan and the playing field is level. Both of those ideas are good plans but are an anathema to conservatism. Conservative ideology has sold this nation to the highest bidder and it sure wasn't you or I. Conservatism is the dark fear we feel when we walk into a darkened room, and it is running this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Koeln Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. The US auto industry has huge problems

The SUV sector is more or less the only sector where they make profits at the moment but even there they face bigger competition from japanese car makers and in the premium sector from europeans.

GM but also Ford lose money with their car production for years now. They become more and more banks and financial companies with a expensive hobby to produce cars. The debt situation of GM is more than alarming and we will see additional down gradings of their bonds in the near future.

They slept too long and in my view it is very late perhaps too late to wake up.

As a european i can say gas is still cheap in the US compared to europe but the average US car needs much more gas than the cars that people buy in europe (in the US 12,8 against 8,5 litres in Germany per 100 Km)

I am german so it is natural to hate bush but the US auto industry really needs time for consolidation and a new start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Welcome to DU.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Welcome to DU, koeln!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedingbullet Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
23. Market
Won't the hallowed free market system take care of these beasts? I am surprised to see so many SUVs on the road, given the gas prices. I suspect people who have them are sort of stuck for now. The smarter ones aren't buying another, let alone a Hummer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalUprising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Fuel Economy Plan Seen Omitting Rule for Big S.U.V.'s
DETROIT, Aug. 15 - The Bush administration is expected to abandon a proposal to extend fuel economy regulations to include Hummer H2's and other huge sport utility vehicles, auto industry and other officials say.

The proposal was among a number of potential strategies outlined by the administration in 2003 to overhaul mileage requirements for light trucks - sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks and minivans. It had been seen by industry officials as likely to be adopted.

But the impact of the tougher requirements would have been borne almost solely by the increasingly troubled domestic auto industry, a concern for the administration.

Its broad plan to overhaul the light-truck mileage rules would change the regulatory system from one using averaged mileage for an automaker's entire annual light-truck output to one that sets up five or six classes, determined by a vehicle's size.

http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050816/ZNYT01/508160355
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. why not offer incentive to american auto makers to market cheaper hybrids?


We were SLAVES to BUSH and the OIL WARS
http://johnsoncity.blogspot.com/2005/08/we-were-slaves-to-bush-and-oil-wars.html

I've wanted to "go public" with this for some time, but couldn't. Not until my husband was free.

For the last year and a half we have been prisoners in a massive slave ring -- a vast conspiracy of government and corporate interests employing advanced mind-control techniques designed for nothing less than global domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC