Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Dems ask DOJ InspectorGen to investigate Ashcroft role in Plame case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:04 PM
Original message
House Dems ask DOJ InspectorGen to investigate Ashcroft role in Plame case
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 10:05 PM by johnfunk
Breaking from Murray Waas
Exclusive: House Democrats ask Justice Inspector General to investigate Ashcroft role in Plame probe
Tuesday, August 16, 2005


The ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Congressman John Conyers, of Michigan, and Congressman Maurice Hinchey, Democrat of New York, will tomorrow formally request that the Inspector General of the Justice Department, Glenn A. Fine, investigate whether then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft "violated explicit rules on conflicts of interest when he failed to recuse himself from, and in fact was briefed on, the CIA name leak investigation despite his personal connection to Karl Rove, a person of interest to investigators."

The letter to the Justice Department's Inspector General quotes new information in this story which I wrote, and that was posted yesterday on the Village Voice, disclosing new information regardingthis story I Ashcroft's role in overseeing the Plame probe, before it was taken over by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

More...


Waas broke the initial details of this story at The Village Voice over the weekend.

NOTE TO MODS: Murray has a habit of breaking stories -- or providing additional details -- at Whatever Already. Yes, I know it isn't the New York Times -- but then, how much of the important Plamegate stuff have they broken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Keep pressing for answers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. John Conyers blog
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 10:12 PM by cal04
More Trails Lead to Rove; Aschroft's Involvement Again Comes into Question
Latest on Detainee Abuse Photos

Those who read the American Prospect or the Village Voice, know that as of late Murray Waas has had the most up to date information on treasongate. Last week, in the American Prospect, Murray disclosed that Rove had met with Judith Miller shortly before Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA Agent, and that the princiipal reason Miller has not cooperated with Fitzgerald is that Scooter Libby had never given a specific privelege waiver to her (which I of course asked him to do -- no response as of yet).

This week, in the Village Voice, Waas revealed that the reason Ashcroft ultimately was forced to permit the appointment of a special prosecutor was because of concerns that Rove may have misled FBI investigators regarding his role in the matter. The problem is, because of his personal and political relationships with Rove, Ashcroft should have recused himself when he first learned about Rove's involvement. He also should not have allowed himself to be privately briefed on Rove's involvement. Because of these concerns, I plan to ask the Department's Office of Inspector General to investigate whether Ashcroft violated applicable recusal and conflict of interest rules and guidelines. (I previously asked them to investigate the delay in the Department's investigation and the advance notice given to the White House). I hope to have more on this tomorrow.

While I am discussing treasongate, I am happy to report that more than 3500 individuals have joined with me in asking the president not to pardon Karl Rove, should he eventually be indicted. Let me also remind readers that Louise Slaughter is still gathering signatures in her effort to ask the president to give Rove a Pink Slip. Both are important and worthwhile efforts.

Finally, Rawstory has a story on the governnment's sad efforts to prevent not only the release of detainee abuse photos, but to prevent any public scrutiny of their arguments. As I explain in the article, it is "truly Kafkaesque to envision a government which does not even permit its legal arguments to be disclosed for publlic scrutiny. This not only violates the Freedom of Information Act, it turns the Act on its head."

http://www.conyersblog.us/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting...
The stench of this whole administration is probably reaching other solar systems by now, that's how corrupt it is. I'm pretty sure I've seen The Village Voice as a source of LBN before. Nominated, because Conyers is kicking ass again. I'll bet he wishes a few more of his fellow Dems would join him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. He is another one to be indicted!!! This is the man who
covered Justice up!!! What a OMEN that one was!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks. Nominated (recommended). NT
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 11:27 PM by Benhurst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Read this link on Usenet... Cheney might be indicted!
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 11:35 PM by calipendence
It's hard to get too excited about this news yet as the source leaves a lot to have one question it's validity yet, but if what it says is true, we're in for a major coverup/set of indictments!

It also sounds like some criminal acts are being alleged here that were being attempted to cover up things (like British agents attempting to off Fitzgerald with a bomb in the subway under the Dirksen Federal Building!)

I'll keep it in the back of my files to check back with if I see other stories that validate them. This one validates that Ashcroft is under suspicion (which is one of those mentioned here that are likely to be under indictment...

Go to this post from earlier this morning:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.bush/browse_frm/thread/584ccdfe6761e33/5c0778ae45d32f76?lnk=st&rnum=4&hl=en#5c0778ae45d32f76

Here is the quote attributed to stock broker Tom Heneghen on who else is under indictment.

"Sources close to the jury probe have allegedly told Heneghen a host of administration figures under Bush have been indicted, including Vice President Dick Cheney, Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, former Attorney General John Ashcroft, imprisoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller and former Cheney advisor Mary Matalin. Heneghen also allegedly told sources White House advisor Karl Rove was indicted for perjury in a major document shredding operation cover-up.

If such information regarding these indictments is correct, the fact that the it has not made the media that the President and the Vice president have been subpoenaed to appear before a federal jury indicates there is a major cover up in operation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick! So, Johnny Asscrack, what were you REALLY up to??
Patriotic, Constitution-loving Americans want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC