U.S. v. Stanley, 479 U.S. 1005 (1986)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 86-393 <snip>
decided: June 25, 1987 <snip>
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. <snip>
Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and White, Blackmun, and Powell, JJ., joined, and in Part I of which Brennan, Marshall, Stevens, and O'Connor, JJ., joined. Brennan, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Marshall, J., joined, and in Part III of which Stevens, J., joined, post, p. 686. O'Connor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, post, p. 708.
Author: Scalia <snip>
http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/research/stanley.htmSupreme Court Dissents Invoke the Nuremberg Code: CIA and DOD Human Subjects Research Scandals
<snip> In December 1974, the New York Times reported that the CIA had conducted illegal domestic activities, including experiments on U.S. citizens, during the 1960s. That report prompted investigations by both Congress (in the form of the Church Committee) and a presidential commission (known as the Rockefeller Commission) into the domestic activities of the CIA, the FBI, and intelligence-related agencies of the military. In the summer of 1975, congressional hearings and the Rockefeller Commission report revealed to the public for the first time that the CIA and the DOD had conducted experiments on both cognizant and unwitting human subjects as part of an extensive program to influence and control human behavior through the use of psychoactive drugs (such as LSD and mescaline) and other chemical, biological, and psychological means. They also revealed that at least one subject had died after administration of LSD. Frank Olson, an Army scientist, was given LSD without his knowledge or consent in 1953 as part of a CIA experiment and apparently committed suicide a week later.<75> Subsequent reports would show that another person, Harold Blauer, a professional tennis player in New York City, died as a result of a secret Army experiment involving mescaline.<76> <snip>
.. One subject of Army drug experimentation, James Stanley, an Army sergeant, brought an important, albeit unsuccessful, suit. The government argued that Stanley was barred from suing it under a legal doctrine--known as the Feres doctrine, after a 1950 Supreme Court case, Feres v. United States--that prohibits members of the Armed Forces from suing the government for any harms that were inflicted "incident to service."<88>
In 1987, the Supreme Court affirmed this defense in a 5-4 decision that dismissed Stanley's case.<89> The majority argued that "a test for liability that depends on the extent to which particular suits would call into question military discipline and decision making would itself require judicial inquiry into, and hence intrusion upon, military matters."<90> In dissent, Justice William Brennan argued that the need to preserve military discipline should not protect the government from liability and punishment for serious violations of constitutional rights ... <snip>
http://www.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_4.html