Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Special prosecutor subpoenas election workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 08:11 AM
Original message
Special prosecutor subpoenas election workers
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1124703332226220.xml&coll=2

Monday, August 22, 2005
Angela D. Chatman
Plain Dealer Reporter

A special prosecutor investigating charges of illegal conduct in election recount last December has subpoenaed employees of the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections...

Toledo lawyer Richard Kerger made the charges last December on behalf of Green Party candidate David Cobb and Libertarian Party candidate Michael Badnarik.

In a Dec. 31 letter to the board and Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason, Kerger charged that the elections board staff broke the law because:...

Kerger asked the board to refer the matter to Mason's office. Mason appointed Baxter special prosecutor in the spring of this year to avoid a conflict of interest, since his office also represents the Board of Elections.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love it...
The entire Ohio Republican Party needs to be marched off in chains to prison. As goes Ohio, so goes America!!! (Odd to hear someone from Michigan saying that, but in this case I hope it's true).

:nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's a miracle!
If OH special prosecutors are like US special prosecutors, once empowered, they always go wild, because nobody can fire them (though Fitz has a time limit). They know they can become famous by digging up interesting dirt, and in some cases, they go on for years because it's a good career with job security. That's why the limit on Fitz, but the time limit also moitivates him to get enough momentum going to get a shot at re-authorization. It's tough to stop 'em once they get started (for the downside, look at Starr's delving into every false rumor).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great news: activation of the two words that are kryptonite to Repubs--
--Under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. 'Aaaah! It burns...it burns...'
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wonderful -- The Ohio Recount was a Travesty
What I don't understand is that Cuyahoga County is heavily Democratic -- is the Board of Elections run by GOP moles for some reason? Or were they just being lazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Something to do with Blackwell.
I think he can fire them whenever he wants. So the Dems either are Repubs pretending to be Dems, or they are cooperating with the Repubs to keep their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. Was this what the PlainDealer was holding?
A short time ago, there was some reports that they were holding back some stories. They (the paper) said the reports/stories had 'huge implications' (or words to that effect, IIRC).

If that's the case, I'm glad they finally got them out there. They've been on top of this all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You know, some of it, unfortunately, is that the Toledo Blade
scooped the CRAP out of the Plain Dealer on the Noe case....

there may be some egg on face now, and the Plain Dealer may have decided election fraud is their redemption.

Wish it worked some other way, like the press wanting to get the truth even if it hurts their board members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Now that you mention it
I may be confusing the Blade with the PD. Don't have time at the moment to reserach it, but one of them made statements recently that they were holding back on some articles...worried about consequences if they were published.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oooooooh yeah!
Can't wait to see this play out. I've been guessing that, considering how many 'irregularities' (wink-wink) there were with the election and recount in Ohio, at least ONE of them will blow up. Maybe this is it! (oh please oh please!!)

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Send some of that down to Alabama.
I'm hoping this will be good. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Guys, it's a big day -- this, and the 36% approval, and some mysterious...
something about "Able Danger" posted here in LBN from UPI. If not a big day, at least a very interesting day. How I'd love to see this cabal Watergated -- if only the press would cut loose and do their jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Paging Mr. Kenneth "Best Election Ever" Blackwell: are you ready
for your close-up?

The criminally bogus recount depended on their ability to keep anyone from actually seeing how they did it, contrary to law.

Hope that Kathy B. hasn't bought new drapes for the governor's mansion yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. Awesome!!!!!!!!!
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 04:40 AM by vanboggie
Please please let the election fraud be broadcast across the land. It's the only chance we have to stop these bastards.

On edit: Oops, I'm dreaming again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. I gotta kick this one.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
18. yessss!!!
From the link in the OP:

<snip>
In a Dec. 31 letter to the board and Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Bill Mason, Kerger charged that the elections board staff broke the law because:

It failed to randomly select the 36 precincts used to represent at least 3 percent of the total vote for the December recount.

It conducted "test-run" recounts without witnesses.

It did not allow witnesses to observe irregularities in the review of cases where the presiding judge transported ballot assemblies, ballots and other items.

It repeatedly fed trays of ballots back through the counting machines without keeping records of the counts.

It failed to investigate discrepancies between the certified recount vote totals and the certified original totals.

*******

I hope I didn't break the "four paragraph" rule -- I'm counting the list of infractions as one paragraph, which it would have been if bulleting had been used. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC