Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oregon poised for unlikely military draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:51 AM
Original message
Oregon poised for unlikely military draft
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/mike_francis/index.ssf?/base/news/112488133662141.xml&coll=7

There is no military draft and federal officials say there are no plans to restart one, but if that changed suddenly, Oregon's system could spring to life quickly, board members say.

"There's a system in place, ready to go," said Mike Weatherby, the mayor of Fairview and a member of the statewide Selective Service appeals board. If a national draft was suddenly instituted, he said, "it would have some hiccups, some stumbling, but it would work." snip

"In my opinion," said Weatherby, a draft is "inevitable given the situation overseas."

That's not the official view of the Pentagon, nor the Selective Service System.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's been ready to go
nationwide since May of 2005. I read that somewhere early in the year, sorry I don't have the link though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And they laughed at me
as well as ridiculed me. When I ranted about how I didn't want my kids sent to war, during talk before the Iraq war. Called me colorful descriptive names. Mommy was one of them. I'm a mommy. I should be ashamed of that? So I said, yes I am, I come from a long line of them, got a problem with that? No answer.

They said the war couldn't possibly last that long, a few years.

They're already wrong, so I have to wonder if those OH so many people that criticized my concerns realize they're already wrong about that, and so likely might be wrong about the draft as well.

Will my worries be as silly then, I wonder. I didn't consider them silly in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. it makes sense for localities to prepare
while I don't believe a draft is likely, or sustainable, if you do, and it's your job to execute one, you might as well be ready to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Mrs. gratuitous was on the local draft board for 20 years
After 20 years Selective Service retires you, but her last training in October 2002 was about the draft, its mechanics and procedures. Those big rotating drums are in storage right now, waiting for the day to dispense their little capsules -- death for those with low numbers, life for those with high numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
35. And Mega $$$$ for Halliburton Stockholders
And other Ilk lounging around on their Yachts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Time For Some More Bumper Stickers

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Timmy5835 Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Relax, there will be NO draft
You need a majority of Congress to support a draft. During an election cycle...forget it!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Regular Army set to miss annual recruiting need by 10,000.
That's just the Army.

It is a crisis situation in front-line units right now.

Where are those young republicans??


The neocons will have to start a draft or scale back military operations. Which do you think thay will do, considering their stated goals?

Back to fantasy land - where the economy is booming and there will never be a draft.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. So you are of the mind that the last elections were legitimate?
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 03:10 PM by Dover

I seriously doubt that the GOP has any real concerns about getting the 'votes' they need.

Their only real concern is if the people recognise they no longer actually have a voice and respond accordingly with a revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. election cycle? you forgot Diebold n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've already volunteered to be on the draft board. Have all of you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clu Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I did last year
Unfortunately, I got a DWI last year and I am no longer eligible since I have a criminal record.

That's what I told them when they called about my application.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's Okay. You can always work for the Bush Administration. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Yep. But I am ineligible.
I am still in the IRR so I can't be on the draft board. But a friend of mine is, and he is committed to making sure rich kids get to serve their country too. It would be a shame if what happened to Tom Delay happens to another brave young republican - all the minorities and poor people taking all the good combat jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. They'd pull out before they'd consider the draft.
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 01:05 PM by Akoto
Calling for the draft, especially with the upcoming elections, would be political suicide. You also need more than just the president to pull one off, and seeing as even his own people are starting to turn against him, I doubt he'd manage it. It'd be chaos.

I hope this is the case, anyhow. I'm prime draft age (20) but my physical and mental health is terrible. Panic attacks, asthmatic, migranes, blind as a bat. I am so afraid they'll come for me one of these days. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Not really
The only big name Republican that has said much against the president
and his Iraq plan, is Senator Chuck Hagel, but even Hagel's voting record stays close to the Republican Party.

Let me give a quick lesson in how this draft works:

1. You receive your notice to report to a MEPS.

2. You receive your physical at the MEPS.

3. If it's determined that you do not meet the physical qualifications, you are listed as such and that information
is sent to your local draft board.

It is very likely that you will then be reclassified as 4F, but the
important thing to remember is that a classification isn't permanent.

As for your assumption that they would pull out before they bring back the draft, remember what the Chimp said yesterday about staying
and winning as long as he was President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. the draft is slavery
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 01:14 PM by Sven77
they've set up the draft boards. its coming soon. who cares about the election when you own the voting machines and the media. if you can find this video its worth the download.

Mr. RYAN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me time.

I rise in opposition of this bill, but I would like to clarify something. We are not trying to scare kids. This President's foreign policy is what is scaring the kids of this country. And people have said today, why are people believing this? Why are people believing this big Internet hoax?

It is the same people who told us that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11; the same people who told us Saddam Hussein had something to do with weapons of mass destruction; the same people who told us we would be able to use the oil for reconstruction money; the same people who told us we would be greeted as liberators, not occupiers; the same people, the same President who told us the Taliban is gone; the same President who told us that Poland is our ally 2 days before they pull out; the same President who tells us Iraq is going just great; the same President who tells us the economy is going just great; the same people who told us the tax cuts were going to create millions of jobs; the same people who told us that the Medicare program only cost $400 billion when it really cost $540 billion.

So please forgive us for believing what you are saying. Please forgive the students of this country for not believing what you are saying. Not one thing, not one thing about this war that has been told to the American people or that has been told to these college students has been true. Not one thing. Bremer says we need more troops. The Pentagon says we need more troops, and this President cannot get them from the international community. There is only one option left. Let us be honest with the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Who is this "fine man" you speak of?
Welcome to DU! Enjoy your stay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Since the polls clearly indicate the majority of
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 03:06 PM by fasttense
US citizens want to end the war, there should be no balancing act. There should be action to do what the people who elected him want. We want the war to end now, simple clear precise. Nixon was able to understand that the people ran this country not the president, and he ended the Vietnam war. But brush doesn't seem to understand he does not run this country. Brush only serves at the will of the people and the people have spoken - get out of Iraq (and get Bin Laden and his group of murderers instead.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Bushler doesn't serve at the will of the people
"George W. Bush was not elected by a majority of the voters of the Unites States. He was appointed by God." -- Gen. William G. Boykin

Also, c.f. Diebold, ES&S, Sequoia, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Terrific speech by Ryan of Ohio.
Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. What video? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago1 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. THERE WILL BE NO DRAFT
This administration is ready to COLLAPSE AND HEAD FOR TRIAL AND CONVICTIONS. NO ONE IN THE CONGRESS WILL ALLOW ONE BEFORE AN ELECTION.

There is ALOT of evidence AGAINST this administration in addtion Election FR**D which has already been collected AGAINST them.

Chaos would ensue and ALL of the IMPEACHMENT trials would begin.

A DRAFT ISN'T HAPPENING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. nothing's been done about election fraud, period.
There have been zero convictions. Zero publicity. It's still an "open secret" and none of the fraud mechanisms have been removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago1 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. The Convictions for Election Fraud ARE ON THE WAY
The democrats are going to time exposing the fraud CAREFULLY. It's only a matter of time and the White House KNOWS IT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm skeptical there are ever going to be any convictions
In fact, I'm not even sure this is an aberration anymore. If there's an investigation, it'll be a a whitewash. If there's a cleanup, it'll merely erect another sham in Diebold's place which they may hope is less transparent. My wild guess about Bush is that he was merely so unpopular the common practice of rigging the elections fell apart enough to make it obvious. In fact, I'm getting rather less sure by the hour as the DLC openly hops into bed with the rethugs and the rest of the Dems roll over repeatedly that the Democratic Party is anything but a sham to make people think they have an advocate in the government.

And this late in the game, even if they prosecuted aggressively now, which they probably can't, it's too late to un-rig 2006, assuming they're even trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. They've been ready to reinstate the draft since shortly after
it was discontinued in the '70s.

Edited to remove time/place specific info:
"There's a system in place, ready to go," said random member of some statewide Selective Service board. If a national draft was suddenly instituted, the member said, "it would have some hiccups, some stumbling, but it would work."

Could have been said in 1979 Massachusetts, 1985 Iowa, 1993 California, 1999 Colorado, or 2005 Oregon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Whoopee!!!
:party::toast::party:

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. A Draft Would Come Back Into Play Because ......
Once we attack Iran, or suffer a terrorist attack at home, the environment will have changed. Once an attack is executed, the dye will be cast and the Congress will realize that the genie cannot be put back in the bottle.

Iran would not be like Iraq. They have a 1/2 Million man army just sitting on the other side of the border with Iraq. Iran has sophisticated weapons to attack our ships, so no "shock and awe" from the ships. Iran has buried weapons deep underground, which cannot be knocked out with certainty by just an airstrike. Iran has already made several alliances with our competitors for its defense in exchange for oil shipments. Iraq would lead the way with an oil embargo against the US, and would shut down the waterway routes needed by oil tankers to deliver oil to the US and the rest of the world.

But the big reason would be a massive loss of life in the US like another 9/11. Or a massive bombing and killing of our troops presently stationed in Iraq. Just imagine the fervor the biased MSM could whip up in no time.

I am very worried as long as GWB and the neo-cons are in control.
You know they didn't appropriate all those millions to modernize and bring up to speed the draft boards just to be safe. Somebody thought it was needed now.

As an aside, did anyone notice that the paper registration forms the SSS distributes through the Post Office requests the registrant to indicate sex "M/F". Hmmmm .... makes you wonder why since they claim females do not have to register. But sure would be handy if they decided to draft females the next time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Cheney's going to order another false flag attack
Also, the draft is supposed to be able to draft women now... they're getting ready to go head-to-head with a very numerous enemy (e.g. SCO/BRIC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. Err, why exactly are they "poised" for an "unlikely" event? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Draft resistance, and an underground railroad will sprint into action
conscription starts. It is our noble duty to subvert conscription by helping those that do not want to become canon fodder for Bush's wars. I am also prepared to say that a potential draftee is gay or lesbian if that is what it takes to save him/her from the draft. Lying to save a life is not a sin, it is a good deed!

Check with activists in your area. Draft resistance groups are probably in your community, keeping a low profile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. more likely that they'll draft gays preferentially
They want to kill all the gays anyway. Why wouldn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beetbox Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
30. No Draft No Way- Refuse to Die for Halliburton
Youth have the right to resist conscription to serve in an illegal war of conquest and occupation. They have a right to refuse to be inducted, to refuse to register, and to defy the Selective Service System and any form of the draft. The government has no right to force youth to fight wars driven by corporate greed and an agenda of global empire.
• Young people have the right to expose, resist, and drive off military recruiters who come onto their campuses or into their neighborhoods to lie to them and exploit their economic hardship in order to drag them away to fight on behalf of Wall Street. While many people, including ourselves, recognize that the return of the draft is a real possibility, it is also important to realize that there is already an economic draft, that forces youth from disadvantaged communities into the military because of the lack of job training and education. Addressing the issue of military recruiting must also include challenging racism, economic inequality, and all forms of oppression and exploitation.
• Members of the military have the right to refuse to obey criminal orders to fight in an illegal war of aggression. The antiwar movement has an obligation to support members of the military who resist. We not only support those who resist--we encourage this resistance.

We Won't Go! A Guide to Counter-Recruiting and Draft Resistance - A new handbook and activist toolkit to be published in August 2005.

HELP Publish 10,000 copies

http://www.nodraftnoway.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC