Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Supporters Turn To TV To Challenge Sheehan To Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Brightmore Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:31 PM
Original message
Bush Supporters Turn To TV To Challenge Sheehan To Debate
Bush Supporters Turn To TV To Challenge Sheehan To Debate
KWTX
August 25, 2005


The father of a slain Central Texas Marine appears in a new TV spot that began airing Thursday, challenging anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan to a debate.

In the spot, Gary Qualls, whose son, Marine Lance Cpl. Louis Qualls, died in 2004 in Iraq, takes Sheehan to task for calling the President a liar and for erecting a cross bearing his son’s name as part of what he calls “your sick cause.”

“Cindy, how can you be so cruel?” Qualls asks in the spot.

“I am challenging you to a debate, “ he says. “I am waiting.”

Full story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. 3 Words, Mr. Qualls.
BRING! IT! ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. I was thinking of a
different 3 words... they start with "go" and end with "yourself"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. yeah! what you said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoeempress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. You mean "go cheney yourself"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powwowdancer Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
81. I can't believe I'm saying this...
DITTO!

:dem:
powwowdancer out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
63. Those were the ones that popped in my mind, too
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
72. All Mr. Qualls does is repeat Rush Limbaugh talking point lies.
I am sorry for the loss of his son and I respect his feelings about where he stands politically. But I certainly do not approve of his sliming and smearing and lying on Cindy. She should tell him that she first wants to talk to Bush. After that, she will debate anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. I'd love to hear him say on national t.v. how he'd sacrifice all his
kids for George Bush. I'm sure that would win him a lot of debate points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformedrepub Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
126. 3 questions
Mr Qualls,

I have three questions for you. I am also a veteran of the US Army, Im not sure if you ever served.

1. Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction the President used as a justification for this war?

2. Why did the President and Sec Def Rumsfeld attempt to tie Iraq to 9/11 on 09/12/01? (ps Mr Qualls, I dug bodies out of ground zero and spent my Christmas Day there in 2001. In case you want to call me an anti-american commie!)

3. If there were such weapons, who taught and trained the Iraqis how to make them? and who armed the Ultra Islamic mujahadeen (including a young saudi named Osama Bin Laden)?

If you have the courage to search your soul and answer honestly, You will come to the same conclusions I have, hence my screen name reformedrepub.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. So now Cindy is cruel
Cindy didn't start this fucking war, but I guess that's beside the point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why should she debate him?
She's there to see the prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. they want to spread their name calling agenda
She should NOT dignify propaganda and lies with a debate

they have their right wing media outlets ready to spread their propaganda

I hope she does NOT fall for it


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope Cindy takes him up on the debate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. "I hope Cindy takes him up on the debate"
Actually, so do I ... but AFTER the Crawford Coward meets with Cindy.

Cindy has really put Crawford on the map. I have Crawford and it's environens in a mapping program in my laptop, and also have it in the Weather Bug Pro in my online computer. (Right now it's 96.3 deg. F, and 40% humidity. Barometric pressure is 29.95, and a 3mph wind is blowing from the east). Go, Cindy, GO!!

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
51. Me too!
She is incredibly intelligent, well-spoken and liable to wipe the floor with any RW nonsense thrown her way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
67. No. Cindy should debate with one person only
and he's too chicken shit to do it. No more Bush proxies doing his dirty work. This asshole works for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
83. No. She NOT a Politician.
Calling for a debate is a stunt, an attempted distraction.
The Bush supporters are looking for sheer political tactics to try and drag Cindy down into the gutter.

Sheehan has a specific, focused objective: getting Bush to meet with her.
She must stick to that goal.

That being said, I think the line I read somewhere today should be sufficient to shut down a lot of these embittered, misguided war supporters:

The war is over! The Iranians won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why won't the coward in chief talk to her?
Cuz he's afraid. A trembling little wimp, afriad to go outside his bubble.

C'mon Mr. Cowboy he-man - don't let someone else fight your battles for you. Oh wait - that's what you've done your entire life.

Chicken-shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. To debate what?
Whether or not Cindy Sheehan has a right to grieve for her son and question why he died? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
112. Very Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ignore him Cindy ..
But she would rip him up, I saw him on MSNBC, he's a typical southern dumbass. I am truly sorry he lost his son to Bush's war of greed and corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
61. Just want to say that..
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 06:23 PM by rateyes
not all of us who are Southerners are dumbasses. But, the ones who are, are dooooooozzziiiees.

On edit: But, it's safe to say that we do have more than our fair share--any of you Northerners want a few of them?

Three things that terrify a Texan (used to live in TX, so I know)--Tornadoes, Stampedes, and Yankees with U-hauls. (no offense TX dems, I was one once--even a conventioneer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #61
69. No offense meant
should have worded it typical dumbass southerner..maybe, well you know what i meant :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Yeah, I know what you meant...
and didn't take it the wrong way---hey, the truth is the truth!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
113. I thought the Bush's moved into Texas in an old Buick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Cindy will make mince meat of him. I saw him on a cable show--he is
not too smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Rove would have to give him a little "back box"
but they seem to do pretty well with that schtick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Wouldn't work this time....
I've seen him. Gary only wears t-shirts, jeans, and a cap with "Legend" logo (whatever that is).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
89. Yep THAT'S HIM!
Maybe the legend is for "legend in his own mind" (that is assuming the man has a mind and based on what I saw... he didn't seem to)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nah...
...I think Cindy should ignore the sideshow being erected by GOP Marketing firms and stick to what she's doing. Typical of the coward Bush to send out the Bushbots to do his attacking and slandering for him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. screw him. This is NOT debatable
YOUR STUPID LEADER LIED

and YES, you may NOT like it QUALLS, but you son DID DIE FOR NOTHING

One day you may realize that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. BRING IT ON! Let's see anyone try to defend the DISASTER Bush* created!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Screw a debate.. Don't let them reframe the situat. Cindy wants a face to
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 05:37 PM by henslee
face with Chimperor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. The debate should take place in President Bush's conscience.
That should be her answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. **'s Conscience?
PUUUULLLLLEEEEZZZZZEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. That's just the point.
It takes the dialog away from a debate in the gutter and puts it smack dab back in Bandar Boosh's lap. Plus, the implication that if he doesn't meet with Cindy he has no conscience is sitting there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ben Ginsberg?...
..is that you and your money pulling that puppets string?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. Agree to debate him
if and when the president agrees to meet with her and tell her what noble cause her son died for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. There is nothing to debate.
But if there was, he would leave crying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. The Religican Party is getting desperate! Cindy has no fucking need to
debate anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Trying to make her look like a chichenhawk. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Cindy says she speaks for herself.
She does not have to debate anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
115. Maybe Kerry will debate him,,,.. Oh were is Kerry,, calling Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. If a dog bites you, why argue with the fleas?
I mean, does this guy have to power to do anything?
its another indication of how scared these bozos are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
116. That is Great! I will use that , thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #116
122. feel free :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AgadorSparticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. What an egotistical jackass!!! As if Cindy needs to answer to him!!
Hey jackass! This isn't about YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is that the brain dead moran that I keep seeing trotted out on cable?
Short kind of fat guy that always wears a baseball cap, sounds southern and appears to be learning impaired?

The guy I am thinking of has been making the rounds on all the cable stations as a " * supporter who lost a son in Iraq" (I guess they can only find one person with a dead child delusional or greedy enough to whore themselves out for their Fuhrer)

What in the world is there to debate?

Ms Sheehan lost her son in Iraq, she has asked for a meeting with the so called pResident and he won't meet with her.

What does this Qualls moron not get in that equation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
87. "learning impaired"
That one I must remember Carni!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. It was with great restraint that I chose those words
What I wanted to say about him wasn't too cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sheehan would wipe the table with that idiot Qualls. But he would
do what these Repugnants do EVRYTIME they are challanged (EVERY DAMN TIME!)....they TALK OVER YOU, dont EVER answer the question (cuz they cant) and chag=nge the topic by simply saying "you dont know what you're talking about." The MSM would of course say that Qualls got the best of Sheehan and the conservative AM radio idiots (HAnnity, Liebaugh, Gallagher, etc etc etc) would praise him for his "courage" and talk about how patriotic this a-hole is. I would like to see Mike Malloy debate this ass Qualls. No challange. Malloy would DESTROY him, probably making him cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. You're right. The Devil could debate Christ
and if the Devil was conservative (and I believe he is), Hannity would bellow how brilliant and forceful the Devil is. And how weak and "French" that Christ is.
My favorite debate? Eric Alterman totally shutting down smartass Dennis Miller on Miller's short-lived show. Miller, without O'Reilly or Hannity's fixed fight wrestling protection, got body slammed by the polite Alterman.
He hasn't been the same since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Dennis Miller is an idiot anyway, who tries to conceal his idiocy by
throwing around big words and stupid analogies that nobody understands anyway (sometimes I doubt even HE undstands what he says).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. I used to like Dennis Miller
until I realized his brain had fallen out of his ear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
93. Bushit should stop hiding behind the skirts of Qualls and his ilk
Cindy's *debate* is and always has been with the chimp--not bizarro world, GOP PR firm funded, brainwashed, freeper sponsored, types like Qualls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Operation Attack Grieving Mothers
Some of these people have no conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner! GREAT meme!
Repeat - repeat - repeat.

This one needs to be spread around!

Sorry to be playing dirty pool, but this guy and his PR-front crowd need to be thoroughly called out. Because this is EXACTLY what they're doing.

Operation Attack Grieving Mothers.

Force him to deny it. I've seen him on MSNBC, too. Poor unfortunate man. Didn't seem very well educated. But he insisted that, as a single father, he's scrupulously raised his kids not to associated with "people like them" (referring to the anti-war crowd). Yeah. Peaceniks are really awful people, aren't they? What's the matter with them that they aren't all amped up to go kill somebody???? This guy is an unfortunate pawn. Being played for a fool by the PR machinery manipulators who would use him for their own agenda.

Operation Attack Grieving Mothers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. Asking the president for the truth is a "sick" cause in what world?
I hope Cindy asks him why he thinks it's OK their sons died for a war that the Downing Street Memo PROVES their sons were lied into by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. Typical...
just like the swift boat morons.

I say avoid this. Cindy's action is now history. This jackass can't piggyback on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiraboo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. If she agreed to debate it should be with the same constraints
as the shrub put in place for his debates with Kerry. In other words, scripted questions, no unflattering photography, hand-picked audience etc. etc. Then she couldn't lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. Shrub had all that in his debates with Kerry
and Kerry still wiped the floor with him.

Cindy could make this guy Qualls look like the tool he his without breaking a sweat. There's no reason, logically, why she should bother - except now the wingnuts will start calling her a coward if she chooses not to. I'm betting that's going to be their next talking point.

There's no sense or logic to what the RWers say. They work on the basis that if they say something loudly enough, no matter how stupid it sounds, then no one can hear the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. More mothers should be like Barbra Bush.
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 05:44 PM by VegasWolf
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
121. You mean BARBZILLA...? Heaven forbid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dickie Flatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. Crosses are cruel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
36. And Fox will
Cover every angle of it, saying that Cindy is deliberately not meeting with Qualls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #36
53. Speaking of the news media, and
I use that term loosely, what is up with the Associated Press?? I read an article today going on and on about the pro-war supporters, and said they're going to counter-protest Sheehan's group of a few dozen protesters, or something to that effect. A few dozen?!?! I thought they were semi-neutral, but these last few days have blown that theory...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
106. Maybe Cindy should use Barbara's phrase, "why should I
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 08:19 PM by anitar1
bother my beautiful mind with debating Mr. Qualls? There is nothing to debate, My son is dead." Actually , he should just be ignored completely. This is the pornographic GOP and Media at work. Trying to get a big fat zero going to take our minds off the real matters. Don't do it ,Cindy, because you do have a beautiful mind. Mr Qualls is merely a dumb, willing tool, and loves the attention. Let them go back to reporting on Aruba, run away brides and missing husbands/boyfriends. The Pugs are so obvious anymore that it has become boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. What is known about the mother of this soldier?
Just wondering whether Qualls is speaking for her. I wouldn't be surprised if she saw things quite differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #38
66. He's a single father...
don't know if widowed or divorced. Said he's ready to send his 16 year old when he gets old enough...the only son he has left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. Frankly he sounds heartless
I couldn't imagine willingly sacrificing my child. I hope the mother is still alive and steps forward againt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. Likewise! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #71
123. It's the "Abraham Syndrome"
Maybe next time he'll find a ram stuck in the bushes and sacrifice it instead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #66
91. "Send" him?
Isn't joining the military up to the person in question -- even if he's a minor? I mean, if he DOESN'T want to go, what is this ghoul of a dad going to do? Point a gun at his head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #91
94. Well, I meant that his 16 yr. old wants to go...
and, he is encouraging him to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #94
103. Still, the language sounds arrogant.
Ah well.

Natural selection at work.

I only pity the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #103
117. Darwin laughing his ass off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
despairing optimist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. I didn't know red herrings could talk
Pass the barf bag, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. what's taking the "pro-Bush caravan" so long?
The number of protesters in Crawford is expected to grow over the weekend as a pro-Bush caravan arrives from California.

The Bush supporters, backed by the group Move America Forward, left San Francisco on Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Trying to scrape up enough gas money... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
73. ROFLMAO
Good one!!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
46. Has she told him to "Stick It" yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
47. What PR Stupidity is This?
Talk about desperate... Bush, you have the ability to change this, but you just don't have the balls, so you send others to do your dirty work for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
48. She would shred his ass
I'd bet on Cindy any day. She maintains her composure pretty damn well from what I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
50. Diversion, pure and simple.
Cindy isn't asking for a debate. She's asking for a honest, well-reasoned explanation from Bush about why he invaded Iraq. Something that he isn't capable of doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
52. Her plea is to meet with the president. He is not the president! period!
That should be her response!

Do not let Rove and Bush's tactics of sidetracking get in Cindy's way. Stay on course Cindy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
55. The new John O'Neil?
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 06:17 PM by 8_year_nightmare
His blatant grandstanding against a grieving mother who is addressing George Bush* -- whose lies & deceit is at issue -- reeks of his being bought by Karl Rove.

And she should not allow herself to get sucked into this low-level fighting back & forth with this man. Her focus is the man who lied about the war in which her son died needlessly. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
56. Unitl you become "President Quall" STFU

Glad you love war so much, we ummm, don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
57. Everything the right does in this is in response to Cindy.
It is all defensive on their part. They really can't touch her with their lies or slander. She is the pure spirit.

All they can do to support their position is to try and tear her down. If their position was truly supportable by facts they would not need to attack Cindy but could repeat the facts. No one believes them anymore. There are no supportable facts on their side. They are desperate. Cindy reminds them of the lies that they are in denial of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
58. But she doesn't want to mince him up - that's where her strength lies
Anyone whose kid died in this invasion and is trumpeting the glories of the so-called "cause" looks delusional. I think the average person would recoil at that. "My son died! Now send yours! I want more sons to die!"

Cindy doesn't want anyone else's kid to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
59. I saw Mr. Qualls speak on TV...
Cindy shouldn't accept. It wouldn't be a fair fight. She would destroy that guy---fighting a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
60. And who on the "radical right" is manipulating Mr. Qualls?
Can we expect to hear O'Reilly, Limbaugh and Partners complain that the far right is putting words in HIS mouth???

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
62. i thought the networks didn't want to allow her to speak?
we should encourage a big media frenzy over this to help cindy MSG spread :bounce:

i can only imagine the questions from the fuhrer supporters...

"Did your son HATE america, too!" - BS

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
64. Same song.....different day. sucks! I hate war.
Bush is worse than Nixon ... Right?

The four students killed by members of the Ohio National Guard were:
Alison Krause, Jeffrey Miller, Sandra Scheuer and William Schroede

The Guardsmen were never prosecuted by the State of Ohio, for any
crime. President Nixon announced any number of investigations, none of
which reached any clear conclusions. White House tapes released later
showed that Nixon thought demonstrators were 'bums' had asked the
Secret Service to go beat them up, and apparently felt that the Kent
State victims 'had it coming'.

I have seen war. I have seen war on land and sea. I have
seen blood running from the wounded... I have seen the
dead in the mud. I have seen cities destroyed... I have
seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers
and wives. I hate war.
- Dwight D Eisenhower

War and Protest - the US in Vietnam (1969 - 1970)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A715042
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCPatriot Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
68. Surprised he didnt let out a "Git er Done".... (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sivafae Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #68
109. My poor monitor!
:spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
74. How much is Qualls being paid by the Republicans?
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 06:41 PM by Jade Fox
And people say Cindy is exploiting her son's death. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
76. Why does * need his supporters to speak for him?
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 06:56 PM by SimpleTrend
* is the only one who knows why he signed the orders starting the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
77. Sorry, but Sheehan shouldn't do it. Her beef is not with this guy. . .
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 07:11 PM by DinahMoeHum
or any Gold Star families who may disagree with her.

it's with Bush and his mis-Administration.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #77
84. Absolutely Correct
These attacks are a distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
78. No way. Don't let this be about family vs family.
This is family vs Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
79. He is not the brightest bulb
I get the feeling that he is being used by RW operatives to further their agenda.

Quel surprise....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
80. So, Bush is now using this poor
grieving father to do what he is too afraid to do?

This isn't a game. That poor man ~ to play games with the parents of dead soldiers!!

Whenever I think they cannot sink any lower, they never fail to surprise me.

They must have pried Karl Rove away from his team of attornies to come up with this despicable garbage!

Cindy should put him on her list of people who want to talk to her, but remind everyone, that Bush the Crawford Coward, still refuses to talk to the mother of a dead soldier because he cannot tell her what the noble cause is for which he sent her son to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
82. You have to be kidding? This guy doesn't want to 'debate'...
...and he probably doesn't even know how.

He has already smeared her by referring to her cause as 'sick'. Why should she give him another shot by dignifying his request for what he calls a 'debate'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
85. Debate about what??
Debate about a mother's right to grieve? Debate about her having the right to ask for answers to her questions from the man who placed her son in harm's way because of his lies, and that are specific to her son's death?

Cindy sat down in a lawn chair outside of Crawford, Texas to wait for the highest (un)elected servant of the American public to come meet with her. What followed was support, love, and others who want answers to the same questions.

There is nothing to debate.

The RW Smear Machine has hit all-time new low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
86. Is this the same Mr Qualls .......
Who had to read his emotions for his son from a script???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dervill Crow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
88. The important three words: What noble cause?! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
90. Sometimes it's cruel to be kind...
I think Cindy could whupp his ass in a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike_The_Computer Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
95. Qualls is in complete denial that his son died a pointless death.
It's his coping mechanism. Sadly, like so many wingnuts, he lacks a reflective quality that would allow him to see things as they are -not as he needs them to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
96. Absolutely not! Ignore him
If Cindy met Mr Qualls she would probably, much to his dismay, try to hug him. These people don't get it and they never will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
97. On one hand they bitch
that she is doing this for the media attention and then some moran wants to debate her, thereby giving her more media attention. I think he is really enjoying his 15 minutes of fame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
98. Qualls said he'd gladly sacrifice his whole family for Bush's oil war
He's a Kool-Aid drinker of the first order, and his son got killed because of it. The psychological implications are staggering. No wonder he's allowed himself to be turned into a Republican operative--the only way he can live with himself is if somebody tells him what to think and what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
99. she wont debate...
but she would give him a hug if he wanted...she brings back the 60s saying.."make love not war"...but in a 2005 version...of love being a hug! She would r eally just tell him that she is so sorry for his loss...and give him one of those big cindy hugs...as one grieving parent to another...these hate filled people are no match for a person so filled with love and purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. that's correct
maybe she should accept his challenge, then try to win him over with her kindness, on live TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underthedome Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #99
102. already gave him a hug, here's the pic....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
101. Bring it on, Freepy.
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 08:05 PM by Arkana
I'm sure Cindy and ANYONE in her camp would be willing to cut you down to size, but not until AFTER General Chimpy tells her exactly why the "cause" her son died for is so worthy. You don't want your son memorialized? Fine. But this is asinine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
105. Qualls does not want to debate Cindy. He wants to put a woman in "her"
place or shout her down like abusive spouses do.

Cindy needs to stay focused on her goal -- forcing Bush to answer her question "What was the noble cause my son died for?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
107. If she does decide to debate him, she should set HER terms for the debate
One of the things I'd recommend is getting someone famous but fair to referee the debate so Qualls does not shout her down. Don't get any of the bozos who refereed the Presidential debates. Even though I'm not a big fan of his, radio host Ed Schultz would be a good referee. Though he would be considered partisan by the Quall faction.

Anyone got any ideas for a debate referee or moderator who is a good moderator but not partisan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
108. These anti=peace people are sickos
They get a Republican linked PR firm to send a swift bus after parents of fallen soldiers.
They have called her all kinds of names. Tried in every way to discredit her.

Now, they take out an ad and challenge her to a debate.....the mother of a dead soldier who asks what was the noble cause?

They are the lowest form of life and they make me ashamed to be an American.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
110. KEEP FOCUSED!!!!
THE ONLY QUESTION BEING ASKED IS "WHAT IS THE HONORABLE CAUSE THAT CINDY'S SON DIED FOR."

ANYTHING ELSE IS B.S. FOR THE TIME BEING.

IF SOMEONE WANTS TO DEBATE CINDY LET HIM/HER FIRST ANSWER THAT QUESTION. THAT QUESTION IS THE "GATE KEEPER" THROUGH WHICH ALL OF CINDY'S QUESTIONS MUST PASS. IF THEY CANNOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS CRITICIZING HER OR DEBATING HER.

NEXT TIME A FREEPER CRITICIZES CINDY ASK THEM THE QUESTION:

"SINCE YOU OBVIOUSLY BELIEVE IN THE WAR; ANSWER THIS QUESTION: 'WHAT IS THE HONORABLE CAUSE THAT CINDY'S SON DIED FOR???'"

THEY WILL NOT HAVE AN ANSWER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius 2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
111. Good God,Cindy is being Zell Millered by the repug party.Dueling
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 08:42 PM by ignatius 2
pistols at dawn. My money is on Cindy,me thinks this guy is none too swift, unless of course,they put a box thingie with wires running to his ear(s) on his back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
114. Karl Rove = Take no prisoners
We should be talking about DSM or the Plame affair and coingate.

But no, now we've got the Swiftboating of Cindy Sheehan to wring our hands over.

We're just a bunch of suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
118. But Qualls, you already talked to her! You even hugged her!
Qualls, get lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarahlee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #118
124. Somewhere on some program
Maybe Democracy now, maybe CNN, maybe MSNBC... but Qualls was being interviewd and admitted that he and Cindy had met and then he said something along the lines of he thought they were getting along but then she had to go to a meeting and she just left him there, did not invite him to the meeting... I think he may have even said that he thought he was going to be part of her group.... wish I could remember it exactly or where I saw it.

Just remember thinking "Ahhh.... sour grapes... he didn't get invited into what he perceived as the "inner circle" immediately, so this is the payback...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
119. Cindy doesn't need to respond to these surrogates. Only to Bush.
This is between Cindy and the President.

The surrogates are trying to distract her and her focus on Bush onto themselves.

Cindy must ignore them.

Cindy's beef is with the President who will not meet with her.

All else is noise on the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
120. All these little republicans all upset. Ah. Proof positive Cindy is
having a major effect on the American Psyche, or what is left of it anyway after 6 years of brain-addled leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuniSurf Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
125. HEADS UP EVERYONE
An Associated Press article just released telling about Bush and Laura with a bunch of the press:

Bush Family Hosts White House Reporters
The Associated Press
Published: Aug 25, 2005



http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBFSP9TTCE.html


CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) - President Bush played host to the White House press corps Thursday night for a private off-the-record dinner at his ranch.

The casual affair of fried catfish, potato salad, coleslaw, homemade cheese and chocolate-chip cookies followed a tradition in which Bush and his wife, Laura, have the press covering his annual August vacation out to the their ranch in central Texas as a sort of thank-you.

The event was not held last year because of the busy campaign season. The invitations to the reporters were issued on the condition that they not discuss conversations at the event.

AP-ES-08-25-05 2215EDT

We need to watch what the next form of attack is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC