Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fearing U.S. attack, Venezuela boosts its reserve forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:47 AM
Original message
Fearing U.S. attack, Venezuela boosts its reserve forces
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/world/stories/DN-venezuela_27int.ART.State.Edition2.231256bb.html

100,000 have enlisted; Washington calls talk of invasion unfounded


12:00 AM CDT on Saturday, August 27, 2005


By JENS ERIK GOULD / Special Contributor to The Dallas Morning News


LOS TEQUES, Venezuela – Marialena Morón always wanted to be a soldier. A 44-year old mother of six, she spends her Saturday mornings learning how to salute in the hot sun. Beside her are 250 men and women –18-year-olds next to senior citizens – lined up in formation on an overgrown soccer field south of Caracas.

For Ms. Morón, a street vendor, the chance to join the military reserves was a chance to make progress for women's rights.

But many of her mates had a more weighty objective: They expected to be ready within six months to deter any U.S. assault.

Military preparations

"We are preparing for the invasion," said Lt. Octavio Serrano, who commands Ms. Morón's reserves unit. The Americans "could come internally with the CIA...or it could be directly and militarily like they invaded Iraq."

Mr. Chávez says he fears that the U.S. covets Venezuela's oil reserves – the hemisphere's largest – at a time when global supplies are dwindling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know what the evil intentions of bush inc are
but I certainly do not blame the reactions of these people - not at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I know what Boosh would do if Venezuela cut the US off from oil
He would invade. There is no doubt about that. Venezuela is Americas single largest oil supplier.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Surprise
The image shows imports for the year 2003 for crude and products.



http://www.gravmag.com/oil.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. WOW - 30% from Canada and Mexico - - Over 40% adding Venezuela
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 09:42 PM by ConcernedCanuk
.
.
.

I think Canada, Mexico and Venezuela should form their own little oil cartel

THERE'S an AXIS of EVIL for ya George !!!!!!

_____________________________________________

On EDIT:

oh yeah,

furgot one small detail

We'll all nationalize our petroleum industries

:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beetbox Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Venezuela Among top 4 suppliers
But the numbers don't really matter for if any of the top suppliers cut off to US the US economy would go into an immediate apoplectic seizure and we would see without a doubt riots in the streets. Would they invade Venezuela if such a scenario unfolded? As you said...

Oilaholics


June 2005 Import Highlights: Released on August 16, 2005
Preliminary monthly data on the origins of crude oil imports in June 2005 has been released and it shows that three countries have exported more than 1.5 million barrels per day or more to the United States. A total of four countries exported over 1.0 million barrels per day of crude oil to the United States (see table below). The top sources of US crude oil imports for June were Canada (1.696 million barrels per day), Mexico (1.616 million barrels per day), Saudi Arabia (1.564 million barrels per day), Venezuela (1.292 million barrels per day), and Nigeria (.896 million barrels per day). The rest of the top ten sources, in order, were Iraq (.608 million barrels per day), Angola (.397 million barrels per day), Algeria (.292 million barrels per day), Ecuador (.288 million barrels per day), and United Kingdom (.269 million barrels per day). Total crude oil imports averaged 10.564 million barrels per day in June, which is an increase of .398 million barrels per day from May. The top five exporting countries accounted for 67 percent of United States crude oil imports in June and the top ten sources accounted for approximately 84 percent of all U.S. crude oil imports.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/company_level_imports/current/import.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. He sure would.
Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourStarDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
32. 14% percent of our oil from what I've read..
We may receive more from the mideast-Saudi Arabia through the various middlemen, I don't know. It's a sad state of affairs though when after decades of a good relationship between both countries it's disintegrated to such an extent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Los gringos van a tener muchos problemas en el futuro con el pais de...
de Venezuela.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Gringos? I don't recognize that word...
What does it mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. White folk...plain and simple...but it didn't start that way.
from Wikipedia:

Original meaning: Etymologically, gringo comes from griego ("Greek"), since Greek was the proverbial example of not understandable language ("It's all Greek to me!"). It was applied to speakers of foreign languages, especially the English language, by the eighteenth century. It was later extended to white-skinned people even if Spanish-speaking, and can sometimes even mean just blond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. So its basically slang then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yep, meaning foriegner, outsider, usually white people. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Yes, but it's not a negative thing
It's the equivalent of "Latino".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Solomente si nuestra presidente tonto va tratar ese...
Edited on Sat Aug-27-05 05:49 PM by manic expression
Creo que Venezuela es muy listo por un invasion. Especialmente por que la gente de Venezuela apoya Chavez.

(Y tambien, Viva Chavez, Viva Venezuela!)

Espero puedes entendar mi (mal) espanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-05 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. Ningun problema. Hemos entendido todo.
Ojala que te vaya bien.

Hasta pronto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. "like they invaded Iraq." - there's what the World saw, y'all . .
.
.
.

and I'm not the only one who remembers G.W. Bush saying on national, no . .

INTERNATIONAL televsion

" well, I'm a WAR President "

along with that infamous smirk of his.


Well that's about the most singular honest statement that ever came out of GeeDubya's mouth

not a President for Peace

He's a WAR President

so

Why don't they rename the Department of Defense back to it's previous name

The Department of War

cuz they sure aren't defending anyone . .

Think I'll look around the house for some dual-use stuff

lessee - javex - doggie doo -

hmmm

little bit more and I'll have me sum of dem WMD's EyeRak had

might as well,

we gotta be in one of dem axis of evul things sumwhere . . .

It's just automatic if you got dat petroleum stuff under ur soil -

right?

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lori Price CLG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Can we join? LOL!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chrisduhfur Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. *evil grin*
Should have invaded Venezuela instead of Iraq. Would have been easier and cheaper... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. But not anymore.
An armed and trained peasentry makes occupation nearly impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. You cannot be serious...
Are you aware of how much the lower classes support Chavez? It would be MUCH harder and MUCH worse if we invaded Venezuela.

Sorry for being blunt, but I don't think you have any idea of what you're talking about.

And why, exactly, do you greet such a conclusion with happiness? Do you like the idea of invading sovereign countries for no reason, and subsequently murdering a large number of innocents and causing massive damage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NEOBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. For Venezuela's sake, let's hope the world community intervenes
On their behalf, not ours. A U.S. move to invade may be all the reason China needs to call our debts due. Game Over, Bush.

This madness won't end until the Bush Klan are all standing trial at The Hague. Or hanging upside down like Mussolini. Either way, I don't care at this point. I'm tired of these bastards destroying people's lives for their own greed. It's time they answer for their murderous crimes against humanity and the planet itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. they're warmongers; they'll just bring it home if they can't do it abroad
Doubtless some false flag "terror attack" will serve as a pretext for martial law and kicking REX 84 death camps for liberals into full gear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I thought I knew alot. Until I googled Rex 84.
They got it all ready. And it ain't no tin-foil.

I'd be worried about it, except there will be full fledged civil war here (including veterans of all types who hate fascists) before that ever happens.

They'd have to cut all communications to keep people from knowing the truth.

But fortunately, it's too late for that, I think.

What they'd hope would be 'robots' by now, aint.

Long live true Freedom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm just curious -
how much effort would it be to invade Venezuela? If the Pentagon is sitting in a board room discussing this right now, what are we talking about here?

Maybe send in a squad of hit-men like Pat Liarson said this week. Would it be very difficult? Would they succeed this time? They've already tried that, several times.

Or should we pull out the heavy artillery and send in an armada? Maybe there are a few idle destroyers in the Atlantic we could move over there.

What about troops? Can we spare a few thousand? Or maybe that's not enough. Maybe we'll need 100,000 to subdue the country. I'm concerned about the cost now. We're already spending $1 billion per week in Iraq. We're technically bankrupt.

These are all important things to think about.

I hope they give it some thought, and not do something drastic.

Stupid fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kbm8795 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks a lot, Pat. . .
and yet ABC Family continues to broadcast the 700 Club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. They have nothing to fear...
We'd only attack if they had oil, right?

But with what Army, I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nothing like a people's militia to give pause to the Pentagon planners!
One-two-three-four, many more Iraqs!

Guevara: `Create Two, Three, Many Vietnams'

BY ERNESTO CHE GUEVARA

We must carry the war as far as the enemy carries it; into his home, into his places of recreation, make it total. He must be prevented from having a moment's peace, a moment's quiet outside the barracks and even inside them. Attack him wherever he may be; make him feel like a hunted animal wherever he goes. Then his morale will begin to decline. He will become even more bestial; but signs of the coming decline will appear.

And let us develop genuine proletarian internationalism, with international proletarian armies. Let the flag under which we fight be the sacred cause of the liberation of humanity, so that to die under the colors of Vietnam, Venezuela, Guatemala, Laos, Guinea, Colombia, Bolivia, Brazil - to mention only the current scenes of armed struggle - will be equally glorious and desirable for a Latin American, an Asian, an African and even a European.

Every drop of blood spilled in a land under whose flag one was not born is an experience gathered by the survivor to be applied later in the struggle of one's own country. And every people that liberates itself is a step in the battle for the liberation of one's own people....

We cannot evade the call of the hour. Vietnam teaches us this with its permanent lesson in heroism, its tragic daily lesson of struggle and death in order to gain the final victory.

Over there, the soldiers of imperialism encounter the discomforts of those who, accustomed to the standard of living that the United States boasts, have to confront a hostile land; the insecurity of those who cannot move without feeling that they are stepping on enemy territory; death for those who go outside of fortified compounds; the permanent hostility of the entire population. All this is provoking repercussions inside the United States. It is leading to the appearance of a factor that was attenuated by imperialism at full strength: the class struggle inside its own territory.

http://www.themilitant.com/1996/6036/6036_33.html

[/div/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Venezuala would be much tougher than Iraq
If Bush were to invade Venezuala (and I wouldn't be surprised at all if he does invade them), it would spell the end of this country. All of Latin America would turn against us. We've lost the respect of Latin America since Bush stole the last two elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Cheney probably had contingency plans to invade Venezuela
US. super power lost credibility with this war president!

http://downingstreetmemo.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beetbox Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. nominated
1. Insist on complete transparancy of the world's oil reserves and production on a well by well basis.
2. Make national energy independence a national economic and security goal
3. Create an energy efficiency ethic in society that abhors wasteful behaviors
4. Raise fuel economy standards for passenger cars and trucks - encourage adoption of hybrids, electric plug-ins and other more sustainable automobile designs
5. Re-institute the 55 mph speed limit for maximum efficiency
6. Decrease traffic through better design, congestion pricing, more telecommuting, staggered start hours, off-peak commuting incentives carpooling, etc.
7. Invest in building and maintaining mass transit systems to connect as many communities as possible.
8. Invest in the national passenger and freight rail infrastructure
9. Revise building codes for maxiumum energy efficiency
10. Encourage walking, biking, line skating and all forms of self propelled transportation through clearly marked lanes and public awareness campaigns.
11. Encourage local food production, urban green gardens, farmer markets.
12. Generate as much local power as possible from solar, wind, biomass, hydro/tidal and other sustainable forms of energy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex146 Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. After the Iraq debacle and the call of the right wing
for a US sponsered assassination, who can blame them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. I don't blame them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC