Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Sistani Rejects the Federation and stresses the Unity of Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:30 AM
Original message
Al Sistani Rejects the Federation and stresses the Unity of Iraq
Najaf – His Eminence Grand Ayatollah Al Sayyid Ali Al Sestani has issued a statement, which read, "In the name and Blessings of Allah we have found that the federation set in the constitution draft is division among your brothers in the north, center and south, marginalization for your unity, loss of your traditions and remoteness of your religion. The occupant desires to see you weak and desperate."

The statement confirmed, "The Sunnis are your family. Stay by their side this time so that they stay by your side in the coming times. Consider them as your brothers and sons and do not bear any grudges within you because of the injustice of the past, as both of you were victims."

http://www.almendhar.com/english_5724/news_print.aspx
-------------------------------------------------------------

Sistani just slammed the current Constitution hard. This will force them to change it or kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. But but Bush, Blair, Condi, et al praised it as a success for democracy!
</sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. he caLLed the Liberators, 'occupants'
and i thought he was our friend. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. he has been for the removal of the occupants all along
he has never strayed from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Glad to see his concern the sisters there.
Edited on Mon Aug-29-05 09:06 AM by FloridaPat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The line about the brothers. Their new constitution only mentions
brother and men. Women are ignored - again. At least the few parts of the constitution I can get a hold of.

"In the name and Blessings of Allah we have found that the federation set in the constitution draft is division among your brothers in the north, center and south, marginalization for your unity, loss of your traditions and remoteness of your religion. The occupant desires to see you weak and desperate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. The arabic for "brother"
can also mean "persons belonging to a particular group" or even "persons belonging to a religious society"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Thank you. I will not get too upset then when I see the finished product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Shi'ah on the drafting committee
have already ignored several Sistani edicts. I have to wonder if it's some kind of intra-shi'ah power play.

The statement is just vague enough for the SCIRI types to claim that they, too, are for the unity of Iraq.

If Sistani wants to scuttle this for certain, he needs to abandon his circumspect way of speaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Did he only made a two paragraph statement?
Seems kinda short for a Cleric of his standing on such an important matter.

Is this stand a hint that the majority of Iraqis see this body, as a whole mostly puppets without the interest of Iraq in mind?

what does this mean for this process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'm not convinced this is real...
for that reason and others. Sistani quotes have a way of being posted to various sites on the web.

I don't remember Sistani's web site. If I did, maybe I could see if the statements there. Test my ability to translate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well this just keeps on getting better and better for the Emperor,
doesn't it? I mean, how in the name of all the gods can he spin this set back? And make no mistake, this will kill this version of the Iraqi "constitution", and even the Emperor's media lick-spittles can't come up with a way that this is "progress".

"Stay by their side this time so that they stay by your side in the coming times." If you didn't get a chill down your spine reading this line, you weren't paying attention...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Not sure about killing it.
It has a chance to, but apart from almendhar and Xinhua (12 hours ago) I don't see this reported too many places.

A lot of times statements are acribed to asSistani that aren't actually said. Usually these get some media attention and then disappear down the memory hole.

But even if it is his statement, it's vague enough that SCIRI can claim the constitution draft does meet these requirements.

SCIRI has never liked kowtowing to Sistani. We'll have to see if this (if real) is the sign of a larger break or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is definitely a knife in the heart of the plan....
to take control of the oil of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. We now enter the "Sistani moves for power" section of our tour
okay group stay with me.. we are walking we are walking....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Sistani's Statements
Can be found in english here

No sign of this one, but there is a refutation of a previous false attribution to Sistani. So it does happen.

I'm looking at the arabic now, but I doubt I'll have time to translate it until tonight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. ARGHH help!
Anyone know how to make the damn text stop scrolling? I can't translate moving text!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. This throws his support to al Sadr and his minions.
And puts down the SCIRI guys.
Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. I have been looking for another source and link,
but so far no luck. (I intend to keep checking from time to time.) If true, this is an extremely important bit of news (although it's only from this single source as far as I have been able to determine -- so caveat emptor), and it will be interesting to see how widely this gets reported.

If this constitution gets "passed", and the results of the referendum are questionable due to obvious fraud -- or because of the problems opponents have in voting -- then it could turn very ugly. (A ceasefire could go a long way to prevent this.)

And, of course, the (our) powers-that-be are desperate (to appear) to adhere to a timeframe that includes the constitution being passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. he is agreeing with al-sadr
al-sadr's followers have been protesting the constitution alongside the Sunnis. chimpy** is in a heap of trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. Even the ink-finger lady at Bush's State Of The Union speech
is rejecting the new constitution. Safia Taleb al-Suhail, the lady who sat next to Laura Bush at the Chimp's State Of The Union Speech, who caused Republicans to orgasm when she held up her ink-stained finger and hugged the mother of a fallen U.S. soldier is now blasting the Bush Administration. She is stating that the new constitution being pushed through by the Bush Administration has sold out the women of Iraq, affording them fewer rights than they had under Saddam.

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050826/bush_abandons_iraqi_women.php

"...According to a Reuters report, Suhail, who is now Iraq's ambassador to Egypt, believes that the draft Iraqi constitution represents a major setback for the women of her country.

"When we came back from exile, we thought we were going to improve rights and the position of women," she said. "But look what has happened -- we have lost all the gains we made over the last 30 years. It's a big disappointment."

She is concerned -- as many Iraqis are -- that the draft constitution allows religious sects to run Iraq's family courts, likely leaving decisions about divorce, inheritance and other issues important to women in the hands of Islamic clerics. "This will lead to creating religious courts," she said. "But we should be giving priority to the law."

Suhail said the United States has sold out Iraq's women in the drive to get a constitution -- any constitution -- approved by Iraq's National Assembly. "We have received news that we were not backed by our friends, including the Americans," she said. "They left the Islamists to come to an agreement with the Kurds."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC