Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Levee Repairs in New Orleans Expected to Finish Soon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:34 PM
Original message
Levee Repairs in New Orleans Expected to Finish Soon
Military helicopters on Thursday dropped sandbags into the levee breach that sent floodwaters from Lake Pontchartrain pouring into New Orleans, the state's top transportation official said. The sandbags are part of a temporary plan aimed at plugging the hole in the levee. The next step: Drop about 250 concrete road barriers into the area and seal the spot where swirling waters toppled the floodwall, said Johnny Bradberry, head of the state Department of Transportation and Development.

The lake's levels have dropped about 2 1/2 feet over the past two days, about equal to the water level in flooded areas on the other side of the levee, Bradberry said. Contractors also had finished building a road that will make it easier to get heavy equipment to the levee. In a separate project on the canal, contractors used sheet pile walls to try to close the front of the canal, aiming to cut off its connection to the lake.

"In the next day, day and a half, it will be completely isolated from the lake," Bradberry said. The pilings need to go down more than 30 feet to fully block the flow of water, according to Michael B. Rogers, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Normally, the canal's function is to allow rainwater to be pumped out of the bowl-shaped city and into the lake. Blocking the canal and using the sandbags and concrete to fill breaches is a temporary fix; engineers will eventually have to rebuild at least parts of the canal.

Engineers have not been able to get to another levee break at the Industrial Canal, on the other side of New Orleans, though water is not flowing into the city from that hole. Walter Baumy, chief of the Corps' engineering division for the New Orleans district, said they were also trying to fix the city's pumping stations.

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB9JR2V3DE.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. About time.
If Bush and the Republicans didn't cut all that money to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, this would have been repaired two days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Way too late!
no offense brother


love to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. If they hadn't cut the money to the USACE...
The levees would've HELD and NOLA would be dry right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. that's REALLY doubtful....
Edited on Fri Sep-02-05 09:26 AM by mike_c
We've known for decades that those levees could not take a cat 5 or big cat 4 storm full on-- the money cut from the ACE budget in 2004 would not have made much difference, nor was there enough time to fortify those levees even if all the money in the world had been available. People just don't seem to get this-- NO's problems go back DECADES and have been ignored or given insufficient resources for decades. People and politicians have GOT to start doing long range thinking.

Next up: global climate change and ocean decline. Twenty or thirty years from now-- maybe sooner-- many coastal regions will become uninhabitable, and people will blame that on the inaction of their future leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mccoyn Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm convinced democracy is incapable of long range thought.
Campaigns are all about gimme gimme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seems like I'm seeing the "contractor" word a lot.
Hmm, where have I heard this before. I guess we should get used to it. Give me an "N", an "O", a "B", an "I", give me a "D". What does it spell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dethl Donating Member (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Halliburton!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ding, ding!
Might be a different name though. They might want to avoid any association with the "H" word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. FINALLY
now they need to figure out a way to get the damned water out besides just letting the pumps run until March '06!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The pumps, when fully operating, can pump 1 inch an hour
so that means getting out an average of 8 feet of water would take about 3 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. 8 Feet = 96 Inches = 4 DAYS
(96 Hours @ 1 Inch per Hour)

I guess you were kidding -- just wanted to figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. They are going to put holes in the levees
to let the water out. They can get the water out fairly quick if they do the engineering right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fucking bastards could have done this Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, probably not
Unless you are talking about shoring up the levees before they failed. As soon as they failed it was all over. There is no way to stop all that water.

The only thing I could think of was helocopters dropping large rocks into the breach. Of course it seems the ACOE didnt have any rocks nor any helocopters on monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Im a bit suprised the sand bags are working...
I also fear that other parts of the levee might breech or be compromised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. First you build a mountain
Actually in this case a wall, and the water will go somewhere else. Water flow is not rocket science.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. a day and a half seems like an unreasonably quick estimate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. Safe for contractors, engineers, and levee repairs
Not safe for evacuations and food drops. Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. About 3 years behind schedule, isn't it?
If Bush had funded the levy repairs that had been budgeted some of this might have been avoided. Instead the money went to fight a bogus war over bogus WMD. But I guess that's to be expected from a bogus government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Army Corps is saying that these levees got the money they
were planning on spending on them.

Remember that the plan didn't call for them to raise the specs to withstand a category 5 storm.

And that the spending was on schedule for the first 6 years or so, and reduced for the next 3.

I'm hard put to be able to claim that the Army Corps of Engineers is lying, or even wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. Barn door open, horse gone, repeat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC