Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Senate showdown looms over judge's nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 05:19 AM
Original message
U.S. Senate showdown looms over judge's nomination
Monday, Oct 20, 2003



Posted on Sun, Oct. 19, 2003

U.S. Senate showdown looms over judge's nomination
By HOWARD MINTZ
San Jose Mercury News

SAN JOSE, Calif. - California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown's nomination to a prestigious federal appeals court has turned into the latest political and ideological slugfest over the Bush administration's choices for the federal bench.

As Brown prepares for a pivotal confirmation hearing Wednesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee, civil rights groups, women's organizations, black leaders and others are mounting a fierce campaign to torpedo Brown, saying she is too conservative to serve on the Washington, D.C.-based appeals court. The Congressional Black Caucus on Friday joined the chorus of opponents - even though Brown is an African-American who rose to the top of her profession from a humble childhood in the segregated South.

Such resistance is considered a strong indication that Brown's nomination will be as contentious as a number of other recent judicial picks by President George W. Bush who've been filibustered by Senate Democrats, effectively dooming their nominations. And the showdown over Brown is expected to be intensified by the fact she is widely considered future U.S. Supreme Court material if confirmed to a seat on the D.C. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"This is an active campaign to use scorched-earth tactics to stop a qualified person to be on the federal bench because she has been identified as a potential nominee for a future Supreme Court vacancy," said Viet Dinh, who until June was in charge of screening judicial nominees for the Justice Department. (snip/...)

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/7051865.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. If I were a Senator, I wouldn't vote for her in a million years
She's not just conservative...man, she's super conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is she affiliated with Heritage Foundation?
That seems to be the "litmus" test for Bush judicial appointees. Please don't shock me with the answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Took a hurried look for a bio., and found this:
(snip) Janice Rogers Brown is currently an Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court, where she has served since 1996. She is the first African-American woman to sit on California's highest court.

Brown was born in Alabama in 1949 and grew up amidst the tumult of the civil rights movement. After moving with her family to California while she was a teenager, Brown attended California State University in Sacramento and then enrolled in law school at UCLA.

After law school, Brown worked for two years (1977-1979) for California's Office of Legislative Counsel. She followed with an eight-year stint in the California Attorney General's Office, after which Governor George Deukmejian appointed her Deputy Secretary of the Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency. In 1991, Governor Pete Wilson appointed Brown to be his legal affairs secretary.

Brown's judicial experience began with her nomination by Wilson in 1994 to California's Third District Court of Appeals. In 1996, Wilson nominated Brown to the California Supreme Court. Brown's nomination to the California Supreme Court met with opposition from the State Bar of California's Commission on Judicial Nominees, which rated her "not qualified" due to her limited judicial experience and her tendency to express "gratuitous" political and philosophical views in her opinions. This was the second time Brown had been rated "not qualified" by the Commission: the previous "not qualified" rating in 1993 cost Brown her first chance on the state's highest court. However, Wilson ferociously defended Brown's qualifications, and she was soon confirmed.

Since ascending to the bench, Brown has become known both for her conservative views and her stinging dissents. The next few posts will explore several of her most prominent decisions and dissents.
(snip/)

http://www.goldsteinhowe.com/blog/archive/2003_03_23_SCOTUSblog.cfm#200040047

Much more about her at site. One right-wing blog I glanced at described her as falling between Scalia and Thomas. A prime @$$####, it would seem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the link
You are a sweetheart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-03 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Another one who's where she is today only because of the
lefties she now despises. She got hers, and now she wants to close the door to others. Her favorite scent must be Essence Of Sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC