Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Specter Will Not Ask Roberts to Take a Stand on Abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:35 AM
Original message
NYT: Specter Will Not Ask Roberts to Take a Stand on Abortion
Senator Will Not Ask Roberts to Take a Stand on Abortion
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: September 11, 2005


WASHINGTON, Sept. 10 - With confirmation hearings for Judge John G. Roberts Jr. set to convene on Monday, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee says in his written opening statement that he does not intend to ask the nominee if he would overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion.

"While I will not ask Judge Roberts whether he would overrule Roe, there are, in my opinion, entirely appropriate questions on his jurisprudential views that might be asked," the chairman, Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, says in the 1,436-word statement, provided by his office.

"For example," the statement continues, "I consider it appropriate to question him as to his views on stare decisis, or following precedents, as well as his views with respect to the importance of stability in the law, which Judge Roberts has identified, along with 'modesty,' as one of his lodestones."...

***

"While I personally consider it inappropriate to ask a nominee how he would vote on a specific matter likely to come before the court," Mr. Specter writes, "senators may ask whatever they choose and the nominee is similarly free to respond as he chooses."

An ardent supporter of abortion rights, Mr. Specter was nearly denied his committee chairmanship earlier this year after angering conservatives by suggesting that it would be difficult for the Senate to confirm a Supreme Court candidate who would overturn Roe. But the senator has tried to play a neutral role in the Roberts confirmation process; when an abortion rights advocacy group ran what he thought was a misleading television advertisement against Judge Roberts, Mr. Specter called for the advertisement to be pulled, and it was....


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/11/politics/politicsspecial1/11hearings.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. oops. Guess they got his balls back in the purse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. The GOP wishing to deny women's reproductive rights
is going full bore with his approval. 2006 will see the GOP wiped away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course he won't.
The great "moderate," "independent-minded" Arlen Specter will be doing his right-wing masters' bidding this time, just as he did for Clarence Thomas.

Specter has already stated on record that he thinks Roberts will be a great Chief Justice. I don't see how the Times can say he has "tried to play a neutral role."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Still a better bet would be to ask him how he feels about the Geneva conve
His primary duty will be to exonerate Bush. Overturning Roe is just the icing on the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Specter has always valued party over principle. Who can forget ..
Edited on Sun Sep-11-05 07:41 PM by struggle4progress
.. his collaboration in the character assassination of Anita Hill?

edit spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. This administration should not be allowed to appoint another position
until there has been an inquiry into placing political hacks in key positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC