Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Wal-Mart Accused of Denying Workers' Rights (class action suit filed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:43 PM
Original message
WP: Wal-Mart Accused of Denying Workers' Rights (class action suit filed)
Wal-Mart Accused of Denying Workers' Rights
By Michael Barbaro
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


An American labor rights group filed a class action lawsuit today against Wal-Mart Stores Inc., alleging that suppliers in five foreign countries denied workers a minimum wage, overtime pay and the right to unionize.

According to the suit, filed in state Superior Court in Los Angeles, Wal-Mart has failed to enforce its corporate code of conduct in China, Bangladesh, Swaziland, Nicaragua and Indonesia while misleading U.S. consumers by touting its human rights record.

The suit, which must be certified by a judge before achieving class-action status, is the latest legal salvo against the giant retailer, which already faces class action suits alleging it discriminated against black truck drivers and female employees.

Beth Keck, a Wal-Mart spokeswoman, said "it's too early for us to talk about this in detail."The International Labor Rights Fund, a District-based advocacy organization, brought the lawsuit on behalf of 15 foreign workers, who contend they were subjected to illegal working conditions, and four California business owners, who argue Wal-Mart's alleged conduct amounted to unfair business practices.

Terry Collingsworth, a lawyer from the International Labor Rights Fund who is working on the suit, said the case is designed to test whether corporate codes of conduct, which retailers such as Wal-Mart require their foreign suppliers to sign, "are simply public relations devices or whether they mean what they say."...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/13/AR2005091301157.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like I need another reason to stop buying from Corporate Giant.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 06:45 PM by sarcasmo
Walmart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love the smell of wal-mart burning in the morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yea, I heard that! I didn't know citizens of another country
could join in a class action case here in the US??? I guess because they are all employed by the same company. I heard this report on Lou Dobbs tonight, so I didn't read the WP article. The examples given on Lou's show were obscene to say the least! I yelld at the TV...."Go Get 'EM!" as I was walking by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. My brother went to work
at one of their Distribution Centers. I practically knocked the shit outta him when he tried passing off their propaganda against unions as a legitimate argument. They have videos and seminars to brainwash and break the will of their workers, all working under the concept, "Give them just enough and they won't demand more."

Are there any URLs that list the erosion of worker benefits, the wal-mart practices that are detrimental to standards, etc ? I'd like a more complete and cohesive argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Question about these anti-union meetings, videos, etc.
Are these not illegal under Federal law? I always thought they were....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-14-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Kicking this, in case someone has what you are looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC