Poor nations lose in watered-down UN document

[cal04]

Diplomats at the United Nations finally reached agreement last night on a watered-down document to reform the organisation and tackle poverty just hours before leaders arrived for the start of a world summit. This final draft, to be presented to the leaders for publication on Friday, fell far short of ambitious proposals for an overhaul of the UN which was set out earlier this year by Kofi Annan, the secretary general.

Development campaigners expressed disappointment at the lack of progress on aid, debt and, particularly, trade. Ambassadors at the UN, who have been engaged in tortuous negotiations for weeks, made one final push yesterday to find consensus but soon abandoned the attempt. Instead, Jean Ping, Gabon's ambassador to the UN and president of the general assembly, unilaterally removed all the remaining points of contention, leaving in place a bland final draft. It is far removed from the original plan to reform the UN to meet the challenges of the 21st century. The general assembly voted in favour of the final draft, which is unlikely to be changed between now and Friday.

About 149 leaders are scheduled to attend the summit, which would make it the biggest-ever world gathering. The general assembly will be addressed by George Bush this morning, and Tony Blair this evening. Campaigners and diplomats who favoured a bold approach put much of the blame for the failure on John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, who introduced hundreds of late changes to the original document.Mr Bolton said he was pleased with the final draft: "This is not the alpha and omega and we never thought it would be."

Oxfam described the development section of the final draft as a "recycling of old pledges". Save the Children said the chance of a historic breakthrough on poverty "had all but slipped through the fingers of world leaders".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/hearafrica05/story/0,15756,1569567,00.html

[CHIMO]

1. Let U.N. reform fail

Let U.N. reform fail
GWYNNE DYER

If we set out to create a farm in the wilderness, we should not expect the top local predators to help. We have our interests, and they have theirs: As our little patch of order spreads, their ability to hunt freely and dominate the local environment will be increasingly constrained. So we should not be surprised that John Bolton is trying to sabotage reform of the United Nations.

The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., recently appointed by President George Bush in defiance of Congress's wishes, believes that if the U.N. is not an instrument of American power, then it is an obstacle to the free exercise of American power.

There is no point in getting angry about that. He and his neo-conservative colleagues are deeply traditional men and women who see world politics as a zero-sum game in which there are only winners and losers. And they believe America's best chance of staying a winner is to preserve the world as a free-fire zone for the exercise of U.S. military and economic power.

That sums up the neo-con view of the world, but their political power is waning as their Iraq adventure collapses and their inability to cope even with domestic disasters becomes plain. Rather than agree to an inadequate document now and foreclose the possibility of further reform for many years to come, it would be better to let the current attempt fail and try again in three years' time.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1126523525807&call_pageid=968256290204&col=968350116795

[mom cat]

2. Bush's policy of neglect worked no well, he wants to make it global!

[Qibing Zero]

3. Is there any way we can

..make it known to the UN that bush and especially bolton do NOT speak for us?

[ladylibertee]

4. I doubt it. Unfortunately, we are stuck with gross misrepresentation.