Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Katrina forecasters were remarkably accurate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:38 PM
Original message
Katrina forecasters were remarkably accurate
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9369041/

For all the criticism of the Bush administration’s confused response to Hurricane Katrina, at least two federal agencies got it right: the National Weather Service and the National Hurricane Center.

They forecast the path of the storm and the potential for devastation with remarkable accuracy.

The performance by the two agencies calls into question claims by President Bush and others in his administration that Katrina was a catastrophe that no one envisioned.

For example, Bush told ABC on Sep. 1 that “I don’t think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees.” In its storm warnings, the hurricane center never used the word “breached.” But a day before Katrina came ashore Aug. 29, the agency warned in capital letters: “SOME LEVEES IN THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS AREA COULD BE OVERTOPPED.”

<snip>

A photo on the White House Web site shows Bush in Crawford, Texas, watching Mayfield give a briefing on Aug. 28, a day before Katrina smashed ashore with 145-mph winds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. But they ignored their own agencies
and are now attacking the people who took them seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. BTW, Senator Santorum of my State (Love to give him to VA)
is using this in his effort to try to privatize the weather forecasting to one of his campaign donors, Accuweather.

From the article posted:

AccuWeather Inc. senior meteorologist Michael Steinberg said emergency managers and the public could have been given an earlier warning of Katrina’s threat to New Orleans. He said the private company had issued forecasts nearly 12 hours earlier than the hurricane center warning that Katrina was aiming at the area.

He said that difference was significant because it would have given more daylight hours for evacuations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I and some other DUers said Saturday it would landfall around Biloxi
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 04:47 PM by karlrschneider
just skirting NOLA a little to the east. I can prolly dig up the thread if search is working, didn't check today...

edit: found one of the posts, it was sunday afternoon.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=4487871
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Sunday, I said to my family "We've lost New Orleans."
while we were playing cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's In Spite of
massive budget cuts by Reagan, bare-bone staffs (have to rely on volunteers, see storm spotters) and outdated equipment (the NHC fly vintage WWII aircraft vs modern jets like the DOE). Please forward to Santorum who seems to have a bug in the ass regarding the NWS needing to drop everything except severe weather forecasting; they have too much to do (true) and should concentrate on this so they can get it right (haha).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Note - Santorum is trying to give to Accuweather
Edited on Fri Sep-16-05 04:49 PM by RamboLiberal
who is a campaign donor. And note the sneaky plug Accuweather gives itself in the posted article to boost Santorum's effort. I bet Accuweather wouldn't have called everyone as the guy Mayfield did. I liken him to the intelligence people in the summer of 2001 who had as Richard Clarke put it "their hair on fire":

AccuWeather Inc. senior meteorologist Michael Steinberg said emergency managers and the public could have been given an earlier warning of Katrina’s threat to New Orleans. He said the private company had issued forecasts nearly 12 hours earlier than the hurricane center warning that Katrina was aiming at the area.

He said that difference was significant because it would have given more daylight hours for evacuations.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Am aware of tricky Ricky
and his accuweather friends. Saw that quote from accuweather and had to laugh. Sure you'll hear about their good calls. The NHC has been doing this for decades and is very sensitive of false alarms. When Gloria went up the east coast in the 80s the NHC issued dire warnings that closed down NYC. When the storm rapidly weakend and the predictions didn't pan out everyone complained about how the NHC cost them billions of dollars. The director quietly resigned after the season. I would love to see a contract that would penalize a private company when their forecasts were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The planes they fly are the best for the job
I know, because I rode one into a storm with them once. Their crews trust those planes, literally with their lives.

They're P3 Orion turboprops, and there ain't NOTHIN' that's going to knock one of those bad boys down. The P3 Orion is the military version of the Lockheed Electra, which first entered service in 1958. The airframe is very strong, and really built to take abuse.

Beyond a superb safety record, these planes' turboprop engines are superior to pure jets for the job because the engines are more resistant to stall and/or flameout in severe weather.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good thing they were so accurate.
It gave our government plenty of time to prepare and probably saved a lot of lives. Oh, wait.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Question still remains. WHY? Why did Bush stand down and
play monkey in the middle with the governor of Louisianne and "kiss my lists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. What do scientists know? It's just a theory. Intelligent Design
predicted the Hurricane would skip across the US to Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC