Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russian school student invents flawless computer program for copyright pro

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 10:52 PM
Original message
Russian school student invents flawless computer program for copyright pro
http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/90/361/16154_copyright.html

The program employs several search engines of the Internet at a time

The electronic editor has an official name "Copyright verification program." It uses the Internet for detecting manifest similarities in hundreds of thousands of texts available on the Internet.

We tested a part of a school composition on Mikhail Bulgakov's Master and Margarita. Sasha Matorin, the inventor of the program, connected to the Net and received the results in a minute. The program indicated that the text's originality equaled zero. The electronic editor found a part of the text on one web site while the last sentence of the text in question was found on the other web site. The program also reported on the location of the web sites containing texts identical to "our" text.

The inventor of the program says that it employs several search engines of the Internet at a time. A text's size is virtually unlimited. A tome like Ulysses can be tested for originality. The program will automatically divide the novel into several parts to come up with a general result later on. Sasha was writing the program all summer. The work became his term paper on informatics during his final year in school.

"These days plagiarism is a commonplace phenomenon," says Sacha's teacher on informatics and a former schoolmaster Andrei Novikov. "Indeed, it is a lot easier to simply download a composition or term paper material from the Internet than spend sleepless nights working on the subject," adds he.

A computer company, a software trader, from the city of Saratov has showed interest in the young man's invention.

more...This is so cool!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes!
Let the children of Republicans do their own damned work for a change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!!! Here Here!!!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. For me, google usually does the same trick
it's handy for nailing "Astroturf" letters to the editor. I guess multiple engines would improve the results. Aren't there websites that do the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. And... not long after... Microsoft...
... purchases the source code and copyrights in exchange for three pair of Levi 505s, a case of vodka and snakeskin boots.

Sasha Matorin says he got "a great deal" and expects more "good buziness from "Count Bill."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. um...that's kind of offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Umm, reality these days...
Edited on Tue Sep-20-05 04:19 AM by punpirate
... is kind of offensive.

Deal with it.

On edit, to whom do you think it's offensive? Who are you defending? Bill Gates, or the Russian student?

Gates has stolen everything he can, and Russian entrepreneurs have found themselves almost entirely at the mercy of Western companies. Who's offended here? You? Who do you represent? Gates, or the Russian student?

Neither, I suspect.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I love the irony
Nothing personal, but you seem better able to dish it out than take it.

PS - I'm not really offended by what you said, and even if I was, so what?...but my girlfriend is a Russian, and your kind of comments seem to her the equivalent of mentioning how much African-Americans love watermelon. I guess we all have a hot button.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I refer, mostly, to the extraordinary...
... level of corruption--and exploitation--existing in the former Soviet Union today.

Ask your girlfriend about that.

That is what I intend by such comments. If the Russian people aren't being exploited by their own, they're being exploited by the Billy boys of the West.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Substitute New Orleans for FSU, and see if it sounds a little different
It does to me. Both are places with long histories of corruption, exploitation, and rule by thuggery. A big difference, of course, is that NOLA is predominantly black.

Anyway, I'm not offended, just pointing out that comments can be interpreted in wildly varying ways depending upon who's hearing them. We seem to live in a time when the greatest offense is to offend others, which is what prompted my musings.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. I thought your post had unnecessary stereotypes about Russians
I speak as someone who is from Russia originally.

Also "reality these days is offensive" is a zombie response to someone taking an issue with something you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vajraroshana Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Flawless? Call me a sceptic.......
I don't believe there's any such thing in a computer program, at least anything complex or useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Same here...
...particularly since the apparent goal of the program is to catch plagarism. Hey, presto! It looks over a school paper, and finds, literally, zero originality. When you get that absolute a result, I start wondering about how the "matches" are calculated.

In fact, there's an easy way to get a zero score on originality -- conduct the search on a word-by-word basis. Unless the text's author comes up with a lot of outlandish misspellings, every single word of his or her report will be "proven" to have come from another source. Now, I'm pretty sure that isn't being done in this case, but it all really depends on how small the "blocks" are that are being compared. Even if it is on a sentence-by-sentence basis, many sentences one may write have been written before by someone else, albeit in a different context. Isn't that so? (That was an example of a sentence that will be flagged as "zero originality.)

Conversely, the only way to get a reliable test of these things is by using very large blocks, such as a paragraph. But there, conversly, the opposite problem occurs, in that a real plagerist could easily fool the program by changing a few words, or even inserting a new sentence, in a block of text lifted from someone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. I see what you're saying
F'instance, if I were to write about my ex-wife, "And she was 'full of hip and gap-toothed' as Chaucer described..." How would that score, I wonder?

The quote scores zero for originality, but it was IN quotes, and authorship was assigned in the rest of the sentance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. What about HAL 9000?
We know how well *that* flawless program worked out. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. they're the most difficult to debug ;->
the 'flawless' ones... but ya know how marketing likes to call'm FEATURES :evilgrin:

bookmarked non-the-less :hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ironically, the idea is far from original
Because examiners have to use programs like this already to detect plagiarism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Maybe they should run the program ...
... on its own source code to find out if he lifted it from somewhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozarkvet Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Takes a lot of time.
Currently a TA (college after Army).

We get a hard copy and a Word copy of every term paper.

My first task is to hunt for cheaters.

Out of a group of 30, you consistently end up with 5-6 that are nearly word-for-word copies --- once a copy a paper I wrote my freshman year (and published nowhere, but prepared on the school system!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordout Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. can it read files inside my members-only plagerism bbs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-20-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fundamentalist Preachers are the most amusing plagiarists...
Take a look at their websites -- they will often go to extreme legnths such as posting their sermons as audio or image files to hide their words from the search engines.

They don't do this to protect their own original work or to discourage those that would harass them, which is what they will claim when you call them on it. They do it to hide the fact that much of their "work" is stolen and hoarded rather than shared...

The notion that you wouldn't want to openly share a religious inspiration with others, or that you would want to claim another person's religious inspiration as your own, is quite astonishing to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC