Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EU lambasts Iran over nuclear ambitions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:16 AM
Original message
EU lambasts Iran over nuclear ambitions

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L21475930.htm

EU lambasts Iran over nuclear ambitions

VIENNA, Sept 21 (Reuters) - The European Union hardened its stance on Iran on Wednesday, saying it was "deeply concerned" about Tehran's determination to press ahead with a nuclear programme which could produce atomic bombs.

"We ... regret, and feel deeply concerned by the fact that Iran gives every sign of being intent on developing a fissile material production capability well before the international community obtains what it needs: confidence that Iran's programme is exclusively peaceful in nature," the EU said in a statement on behalf of 25 EU members and other European states.

The statement was read by British Ambassador Peter Jenkins during a closed-door meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) 35-nation board of governors, which is discussing an EU draft resolution that would report Iran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Iran doesn't care about 'deep concerns'
They know that the EU won't do anything substantive to back up its concerns, so they will continue down the road to nuclear arms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What does Iran care? They will now own Iraq, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. seriously,
can't we just leave Iran alone? I, for one, don't care that they have nuclear technology and possibly could develop nukes. I'd hope they wouldn't, but India and Pakistan developed nukes, and I'm not here freaking out. France, Britain, Israel, U.S., Russia, China...they all have nukes. Am I freaking out? No. All this WMD fears and "justifications" for war are pure hogwash.

If we don't mess with Iran, Iran will continue being the non-aggressive country it has been. Can't say much for its backwards, theocratic regime domestically, but it hasn't done anything to anyone. LEAVE EM ALONE. Focus on our own problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Iran does have a history of supporting Islamic terrorism
People aren't worried that Iran would use nukes, but give nukes to those who would use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What exactly would supporting terrorists with nukes accomplish?
I fail to see how the strategy of hoping one or more nukes would successfully be used to attack Israel would be superior than a strategy of mounting nuclear warheads on ballistic missiles.

Such an attack by one terrorist cell would at best kill several thousands people in a major city while an Israeli counter attack would wipe Iran off the face of the map. The terrorists would also have to carefully place such a device to ensure maximum effect owing to the rapid rate at which the heat flash and pressure wave drop off over distance. At least with a conventional nuclear attack both sides would be assured the certainty of MAD for both belligerents, satisfying each side's "logic" of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The many possibilities...
Iran selling a nuke to a terrorist would not neccesarily result in MAD. It depends on who uses it, where its used, how its used, and the amount of destruction done. The princple of MAD refers to the U.S. and USSR, where if one country fired a missile at the other, the other country could respond before the first missile hit OR the missile's impact wouldn't completely destroy the country's ability to respond. A nuclear-device detonated in a major city (a la Sum of All Fears, ignoring the rest of the nonsense in that movie) would create much more chaos than your basic rogue nation launching a missile.

And the primary reason for Iran to sell a nuke on the black market is the same reason anybody sells anything on the black market: to get something in return, whether that be a very very large amount of money, arms, food, commerce, et al.

While the possibility is unlikely, its definately one that is credibly feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Iran doesn't need that type of money
Iran is an oil-rich nation. It doesn't need that type of money. The risk of having nukes that could eventually either be linked to Iran or used by those groups against Iran greatly outweights whater measly sum is paid for the nuke (in comparison to oil revenues). Iran is not selling nuclear or WDM weapons on the black market. I wouldn't put it past them regarding selling rifles, rockets, and grenades, but nothing larger than a Humvee.

Relax folks. Don't fall for the American propaganda. Leave Iran alone, and they'll focus on their own society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. You are assuming that Israel is the target
Iran also has a beef with the 'Great Satan.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fbahrami Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. some clarifications
First let me say that though I'm Iranian I have no sympathy for the current regime, the shah's regime, or the CIA's 1953 meddling in Iran.

I think the level of discourse drops when we

1) discuss symptoms (e.g. terrorism) without discussing causes, and/or

2) use pre-made (propoganda) terminology like 'Islamic terrorism', since technically Islam supports terrorism no more than any other religion does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. it doesn't work that way
States don't give nuclear weapons to non-state entities. States don't act like individuals do. Their prime interest is survival. Giving nukes to a person that could turn against you in the future is a dangerous move, so states wouldn't do that. Arming groups with conventional weapons, maybe, but even that, they won't give their strongest conventional weapons to a non-state group.

Iran may have sponsored proxy attacks, but the most I remember was attacks against Israel in Lebanon, which I thought were totally legitimate, and I don't consider it terrorism. Beyond that, Iran, if not messed with, hasn't done anything to anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Russian opposition threatens EU push on Iran
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2005-09-21T102552Z_01_HO029363_RTRUKOC_0_UK-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml&archived=False

<snip>

"A European Union drive to haul Iran before the U.N. Security Council over its nuclear plans was in jeopardy on Wednesday following stiff opposition from Russia, which warned against escalating the standoff with Tehran.

The EU has circulated a draft resolution calling on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) governing board to report Iran's secretive nuclear programme to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions on Tehran.

But Russia, which as a permanent, veto-wielding member of the Council could block any action, warned against antagonising Iran, which Western countries suspect is developing atomic weapons under cover of a civilian nuclear energy programme.

"While Iran is cooperating with the IAEA, while it is not enriching uranium and observing a moratorium, while IAEA inspectors are working in the country, it would be counter-productive to report this question to the U.N. Security Council," Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted on Wednesday as saying.

"It will lead to an unnecessary politicising of the situation. Iran is not violating its obligations and its actions do not threaten the non-proliferation regime," he said in a speech in San Francisco reported by the RIA Novosti news agency."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who is more dangerous the EU or Iran
I know what I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. Said France and Britain
while they played with their own nukes in the sandbox.

Give me a break. Leave Iran alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC