Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil reserves are double previous estimates, says Saudi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:07 PM
Original message
Oil reserves are double previous estimates, says Saudi
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 10:13 PM by lovuian
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article315546.ece

Oil reserves are double previous estimates, says Saudi
By Saeed Shah
Published: 28 September 2005
Saudi Arabia, the biggest oil producer, and Exxon Mobil, the largest oil company, yesterday declared that the world had decades' worth of oil to come, in an attempt to calm fears about the record prices experienced in recent weeks.

Forming a powerful alliance, the Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi said, at an industry conference in Johannesburg, that the country would soon almost double its "proven" reserve base, while Exxon's president, Rex Tillerson, spoke of 3 trillion or more barrels of oil that are yet to be recovered.

Mr Naimi said that Saudi Arabia would "soon" add 200 billion barrels to its current reserves estimate of 264 billion barrels. The level of the kingdom's reserves and future production capacity are a controversial issue, with sceptics suggesting that it is running out of oil. Muhammed-Ali Zainy, of London's Centre for Global Energy Studies, said: "Since these Opec countries are closed, the only information available is available to themselves alone. So they can come up with a new reserves figure and the rest of the world will just have to take it."

Why am I thinking SauDi Arabia doesn't want hybrids and conservation???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. They'll probably charge triple the price for something twice as expensive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Saudis and Exxon-Mobile.
Would someone please give me one good reason as to why we should believe anything these crooked bed partners say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. how convenient, eh? still need to get off oil and on to the future... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right. Tell it to the melting ice caps. Oil vey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. That new cross country pipeline that ends in Iraq will really pay off!...
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 10:15 PM by kikiek
Anyways would the Saudi's lie to us? I like Bush saying he would release more oil from the reserves. From what I understand the problem is in the refining of it. What good is that going to do? Just like Enron and the power outages they're screwing with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. Yes
Coincidently, Iraq's reserves are now zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, Porgie needs to go do some "jawboning" then and get them to open the
spigots!! Didn't he run on his jawboning skills back in 00????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Raising Stated Reserves is the New "IN THING" in the Oil Patch


    The company has delayed its annual report, due on Friday, until later in the year.

    And for the second time in less than four months, it has had to admit to getting its estimated oil reserves wrong.

    Investors' trust in the company is already at a low ebb. But news like this is bound to set the alarm bells ringing anew.

    And with the recent departure of Chairman Sir Philip Watts, this mistake means Shell will have to work even harder to rebuild its image.

    Shell overstated oil reserves by 250 million barrels in Norway. That's after discovering 3.9 billion barrels had - metaphorically, at least - evaporated in January.


Shell Cuts Oil Reserves Again, Reuters, Feb 3, 2005

    Royal Dutch/Shell Group unveiled another, bigger-than-expected, cut in oil reserves on Thursday but tempered the news by announcing record profits and plans for higher dividends and share buybacks.

    ---edit ---

    Shell has been struggling to rebuild investor confidence after a reserves over-booking scandal last year that led to the sacking of top management and raised serious concerns about the company's ability to replace the oil it pumps with new finds.

    The company said it had completed its reserves review and would restate around 1.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe), worse than analyst expectations of around 900 million.


If you're not on the "inside" - estimating reserves is a crap shoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. This sounds kind of unlikely.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 10:25 PM by The_Casual_Observer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. The oil companies getting scared of new technology
that creates more fuel efficient vehicles?

That's what I read into this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. So Guys & Gals I agree it doesn't make sense so Why this announcement
to the world at this time??? Whats your guys theories???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Easy: Lies
all Lies.

This is the drug pusher, trying to soothe his junkie, who's having delerium Tremens. The poor lunatic heard a rumour on the street that the supply is running out. Poor thing is a real mess, laying in a heap on the sidewalk, shaking. "Don't worry, sweetie. We just found a WHOLE LOT MORE".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Refuting Matthew Simmons.
See the Peak Oil forum for more info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. or see reply 52 on this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
57. We are facing the end of civilization as we know it.
Do you think they'll tell us the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushwick Bill Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. OK, Let Us Do An Audit
Funny that these reserves appeared out of thin air. Want to know why they are full of shit? (A) They won't let anyone audit their fields and (B) Here's your 400 page prima facie case that they are full of garbage. Matthew Simmons reviewed all of the old technical papers written by people about Saudi oil fields when western oil companies had access to those reserves and the numbers weren't a state secret like they are now. He simply presented a case that there is no way the Saudis have the amount of recoverable reserves they say they have. What's worse is that most of their production comes from a few major oil fields that are several decades old and likely on the verge of collapse once they decline because of aggressive drilling techniques like horizontal and bottle brush drilling. This could be a big fucking problem if you consider that almost all economic growth relies on the assumption that the Saudis are the one last hope to provide the world with any spare capacity over the next few decades. Here is the book.

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/047173876X.01._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_AA240_SH20_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

The Saudis are out of spare capacity and what they bring online is increasingly heavy sour crude, which many refineries can't use.

I'll leave you with a horribly scary anecdote. The biggest oil field in the world, Ghawar, has produced 55 billion barrels to date (everyone agrees on numbers produced). The Saudis say that this field has 125 billion barrels remaining. Matthew Simmons (who wrote that Twilight In The Desert book), had a talk with a neighbor who was an old Chairman at Texaco, who insisted that when western oil companies had access to those reserves, the consensus was that the field never had more than around 61 billion barrels total.
http://www.energybulletin.net/1264.html
So, the biggest oil field in the world might have 6 billion barrels of oil remaining, while we're told it has 125 billion barrels left. Uh, that may be a little bit of a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Exactly...the Saudi's have never allowed a public audit of their
data. We have to take their word on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. prove it-- increase production....
Not gonna happen. It's all a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. So there's no need to look into alternative energy sources
for a long, long time!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. And if the Saudis don't have the Oil then they don't have power
and then who would be next in line to dictate oil prices???



Iran Venuzuela???

Interessting huh!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great guys - then how about doubling your Arab Super Light production?
Well? How about it, Saudi "see no need to increase production at the present" Arabia? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Was this statement by the same PR firm that does the Zarqawi stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. WOW you mean there is a connection to Al Quida here???
Why would Al Quida want the world to think Saudia Arabia has no oil shortage or has reached Peak Oil???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's the Saudis' way
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 10:40 PM by Turbineguy
of thanking Bush for letting them off the hook on the sex-slavery thing.

If this were true it would have been priced into the market weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bhaisahab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. add 200 bbl soon?
like how? collect the royal family's farts and convert em into low-grade petrol?

the saudis are past peak production. fucking liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. Didn't the Bush Administration stonewall investigations into V.P Cheney's
energy policy meetings on the grounds that making the meetings a matter of public record would discourage those companies from being frank and forthcoming with their assessments? Why should we just trust the Saudis and Exonn Mobil now?

Nearly doubling reserves? Yeah and "The check's in the mail!". ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. The only problem is we're running out of air!
If we don't roll back CO2 emissions we're going to suffocate in our own exhaust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
41. and ice! (Arctic Ice, that is)
oh, and rain forests. And clean living oceans. And so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. It's the return of ...
... the Iraqi Information Minister!

http://www.dynart.com.nyud.net:8090/jorge/imagens/iraqi_information_minister.jpg

We have 10 trillion barrels in our reserves! Other estimates are nowhere! They are on the moon!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tainowarrior Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. rabbits out of bottom-holed hats
hey, look here's another! Hey, what's that over there (crowd looks to the horizon while magician puts same rabbit under the hat)

Hey, look, here's another rabbit!

Time for a serious investment in renewable energy engines for cars and industry. Peak oil is coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oggy Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
27. Well that's nothing
I'm soon to add 300 billion barrels to my current reserve under my garden, you can't come and check though. I am Trustworthy and I don't fund terror organisations to placate my subjects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
28. Who cares?
If Saudi Arabia increases its estimated reserves ten-fold, we shouldn't care. If we don't find alternative sources for energy, then even if the legitimate estimates of their reserves increases, we'll just remain dependent on them for our energy. We need alternative sources now. No matter what Saudi Arabia claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
29. There's an easy way to confirm this. If this is TRUE then the price
of a barrell of oil should fall to around $30 almost immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike923 Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. The price of oil is obviously inflated....
even without this "news". Just like the current real estate boom, people are constantly fed through our main stream media that the price of oil is about to hit $100 per barrel. So when an investor is convinced that he's getting a bargin at $60, he'll go ahead and buy simply because he thinks it is going up 80% in a timely manner. The next guy still thinks he's getting a bargin at $65. There's no other reason the price of oil is where it is, and it could fall hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Exactly. And if the largest producer announces it has DOUBLE what
they have been saying they have and the price doesn't fall, then it goes straight from inflated to HYPERinflated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. It is unlikely prices will drop significantly
World excess capacity of major oil-producing nations had dwindled to only ~1 million barrels per day, while demand has grown to over 80 million barrels per day. Until a few years ago, excess capacity was over 3 million bpd. China's economy continues to boom, as does US oil demand, with car ownership predicted to triple to 120 million within a decade. There still is surplus supply, but as supply and demand dictate, as a commodity becomes more scarce, the price goes up. When world demand grows and excess capacity goes eventually negative, then oil prices will skyrocket as nations start bidding wars to get the oil they need.

At the same time, Gulf oil production has been crippled for an indeterminate amount of time by hurricanes and the US is releasing oil from oil reserves to compensate. There is no guarantee that more hurricanes won't disrupt oil production next year as well; whether by naturally occurring weather patterns or global warming we've entered a period where hurricanes have become more common and stronger in intensity. The US will now have to buy millions of barrels of oil as they refill the federal oil reserves they've tapped.

If oil is overpriced, I seriously doubt it would fall below $45-$50/barrel in a best-case scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
31. Yeah, heck, we got triple what we had before, triple, you hear triple.
:rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Saudis just make stuff up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boise1 Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
34. They are blowing smoke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. I guess this falls into the, "I forgot to carry the one" catagory....
so suddenly they have twice as much? I find this funny because it's widely known in oil circles that no one really knows how much they have and it's only based upon the best estimates from their various ultrasound survays.

they are worried.

There is no turning back either with alt fuel cars or the prices. They can try and sell us all the ice in the winter they want but the reality is: we have hit peak oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plasticsundance Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
36. The Saudis are a sad parody
No one believes their shit. The Saudis better get that little skinny twerp they always have make the rounds on the News Hour, as he spews one lie after another.

The Saudis also better get a better mathematician, since my understanding is that to stem Peak Oil there needs at least three new discoveries of reserves the size of Ghawar. Thus far, with this new lie of reserves from the Saudis, they hardly have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Note on Ghawar...
Edited on Wed Sep-28-05 07:55 PM by Solon
I heard that a full third of the output from Ghawar is WATER, used, of course, to help pump the oil out, but a THIRD, thats a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. True, a 30-55% water cut doesn't bode well for Saudi Aramco (or us)
http://www.energybulletin.net/1269.html

"I have noted elsewhere that the data I am being told by engineers who have actually worked on Ghawar, that this decade will see it's peak. (Morton, 2004 PSCF in press). Others have noted how the percentage of water brought up with the oil has been growing on Ghawar. There are published reports that Ghawar has from 30-55% water cut. This means that about half the fluids brought up the well are water."

And -- "At Ghawar,' he said, 'they have to inject water into the field to force the oil out,' by contrast, he continued, Shayba's oil contained only trace amounts of water. At Ghawar, the engineer said, the 'water cut' was 30%."

"The hairs on the back of my neck stood up. Ghawar's water injections were hardly news, but a 30% water cut, if true, was startling. Most new oilfields produce almost pure oil or oil mixed with natural gas--with little water. Over time, however, as the oil is drawn out, operators must replace it with water to keep te oil flowing --until eventually what flows is almost pure water and the field is no longer worth operating."

"Ghawar will not run dry overnight, but the beginning of the end of its oil is in sight." Paul Roberts, "New Tyrants for Old as the Oil Starts to Run Out, " Sunday Times (News Review), May 16, 2004, p. 8

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. ENRON says it has 500 billion in cash; refuses calls for AUDIT, "trust us"
Saudi Arabia is becoming the ENRON of OPEC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea
Shortages and high prices hurt the poor the most, but they also instigate activity in conservation and new technologies. I wish those bastards would run out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Gas Prices up up and
away!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
44. Forgive me ...
If I choose not to wait for the Pigs to Fly By. :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuck55 Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hey great news!
With oil at current prices the tar sands are (currently very) profitable, which then gives Canada the largest oil reserves on the planet at 280+ billion barrels. If the Saudi's can pull another 200 billion barrels out of their ass then we shouldn't have Bradley's rolling across the 49th anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. Interesting timing, on the heels of the Gazprom deal -
Gazprom to Buy Sibneft Stake for $13.01B

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/28/AR2005092800418.html

MOSCOW -- MOSCOW (AP) _ Russia's state gas monopoly Gazprom struck a deal Wednesday to pay $13.01 billion for control of the private Sibneft oil company, consolidating the government's grip over the strategic energy industry.

snip>

"This fulfills the Kremlin's fairly obvious ambition to restore state control over the energy sector," said Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Alfa Bank. "The state will now be directly responsible for a third of Russia's daily oil output."

Until last December, the government's main oil asset consisted of Rosneft, the country's eighth largest oil producer. Most of the industry was privatized in controversial deals after the breakup of the Soviet Union.

The deal will realize Gazprom's long-held aim of expanding further into oil production. The world's largest natural gas producer, long groomed as a state energy giant to rival Saudi Arabia's Aramco, came under state control in June when the government raised its stake above 50 percent.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
47. I knew it! I knew this peak oil was a ploy to ramp up the price of oil/gas
Then they'd magically find more but keep the price up because we're all used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. That was sarcasm, right?
Edited on Wed Sep-28-05 09:10 PM by IDemo
They (OPEC/Saudi Arabia/Saudi Aramco) claiming to have suddenly "found more bubblin' crude" means nothing now, as it didn't several years ago when upping your estimated reserves was a shrewd accounting move, taken by all OPEC nations.

They have promised increases of 500k/bpd to 2M/bpd recently and have shown nothing for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. no.
supply and demand. econmics 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
48. Exxon Mobil comes out with the same BS four times a year
Edited on Wed Sep-28-05 09:01 PM by high density
in their quarterly reports. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
51. Get ready to be bent over a barrel.
Pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
52. They're fucking LYING!
http://www.financialsense.com/transcriptions/Simmons.html


"JIM PUPLAVA: Joining me on the program is Matthew Simmons. He’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Simmons & Company International, a Houston-based investment bank that specializes in the energy industry. Mr. Simmons serves on the boards of Brown-Forman Corporation, The Atlantic Council of The United States, he’s also a member of the National Petroleum Council and The Council of Foreign Relations. He has an MBA from Harvard University. And he’s here to discuss his new book Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy.

Matt, I want to start out the discussion from the back of your book in Appendix B. Several years ago you did a study of the world’s major oil fields. What did you find?

MATTHEW SIMMONS: It was really an incredible exercise of trying to collect the data no one had ever actually thought of doing before, and that’s, what are the top oil fields in the world – field by field. And the background for me doing this is that I’ve participated 2 years in a row in an energy supply workshop, conducted by the energy analysts of the CIA in Washington, where they got about 10 of the best oil experts together, and we’d spend a day doing a discussion of all the key countries, and how much oil capacity they had in place over the course of the coming 3 years. I sat there listening aghast at all of these experts with their laptops that kept looking at their supply models, and it’s how China will be producing 3,217,000 barrels/day this year, and 3,281,000 barrels/day. And I basically said: “how do you all even know that. What are the 3 or 4 top fields in China?” And no one had any answers.

So I decided it would be interesting and educational to see if you could actually put together a list of the top 20 oil fields by name. And I thought somebody must have done this before, and the more I dug the more I realized that no one ever had. So I basically decided – arbitrarily – 100,000 barrels per day production was my cutoff of what constituted a giant oil field and all Fall of 2000, I believe this was, I basically took data from various areas and kept trying to hone in on the total list, and I decided once I got it done, I would circulate it widely to the 4 or 5 or 6 hundred people who really ought to know the areas a lot better, and that would flush out the real data. What I came up with was finding that there are about 120 oil fields in the world that still produced over 100,000 bpd, and that they collectively were 49% of the world’s oil supply. What I also found is that the top 14 fields that still produce over 500,000 bpd each, were 20% of the world’s oil supply, and on average they were 53 years old. The next thing I found was that in the Middle East you had basically, somewhere between 3-5 oil fields in each of the major Middle East oil producers that made up about 90% of their supply – and until I did that I had just assumed the Middle East had hundreds of oil fields – and all these oil fields were old. And then what I found was – because we made it clear that anyone who wanted a copy could get one, but the caveat was that if you have any better information, let me know – I probably shipped over a thousand of these copies out to people and I had about 5 responses of “here’s a field you missed, here’s a field you misspelled or here’s a field you said it was producing X, and I believe it’s probably producing Y.” Only about 5 responses, out of over a thousand people who got this. What I got from hundreds of people was “this is amazing, I’ve never thought about this before.” And these aren’t just sort of random people, these are people that are all passionate energy analysts. So that gave me the background, when I finally had my only trip I’ve ever taken to Saudi Arabia. I knew ahead of time that they had these 5 key fields that must still be producing 90% of their oil, and it was that knowledge and data that allowed me to just peer into presentations we were having, so that I came away saying, “you know I really wonder whether in fact we’re sitting on an illusion that Saudia Arabia has all this vast amount of producible oil.” And I also then had an idea of what issues I should start trying to research, and within months I had discovered this phenomenal database of technical papers at the Society of Petroleum Engineers, that I spent all Summer, two years ago in Maine, plowing through, and it was at the end of that exercise that I decided I was going to write a book. <5:24>

JIM: It’s incredible, because every energy supply model starts with the assumption that Saudi oil is plentiful. It’s inexpensive to produce and supply can expand to meet demand. I mean, whether you’re looking at the IEA or the USGS, that’s not necessarily the case.

MATT: Yes. What’s interesting is that we’ve based all of this assumption on no data. <5:46>

JIM: That is amazing!

MATT: I mean, it would be like someone assuming General Electric could basically grow by 30% per annum, and that by 20 years from now they’d have a company that was bigger than the economy of the United States, because they needed to do that to support their stock price, and no one ever saying, “Wait a sec, how could a single company ever grow beyond the economy of the United States.” But this is far more important in the unforeseen consequences: that we’ve effectively built a world economy on the illusion that Middle East oil would last forever at inexpensive cost. <6:22>

JIM: You know last year, Matt, the Saudi Oil Minister announced they could expand their oil reserves by 77% to 461 billion barrels. Is that a political statement, because their doesn’t seem to be – from looking at your data in terms of how their reserves were compiled – where do they get that number?

MATT: They assume it! What’s really astonishing is that I had a suspicion 2 years ago, when I’d finished going through 150 of these technical papers, that I might well have done an exercise no one in the world had ever done before, and that’s piece together these individual study-area problems and put them together until you had basically done a forensic pathology of their oil system. And I wondered whether anyone in Saudi Arabia had ever actually done the same amount of research. And now it turns out, I was apparently the first person in the world to ever actually challenge the assumptions of the unlimited amount of their oil supplies. And it hit a nerve I would never ever have expected because I wasn’t a household name – I think I am today in Saudi Arabia – I was just an investment banker in Houston. It was the same sort of reaction if someone went to the Vatican and said, “I hate to tell you all this, but there really isn’t a God, and there isn’t a Pope.” And out of that came a massive public relations campaign by the senior management of Saudi Aramco, the state oil company, and the Petroleum Ministry that effectively has said, “we can produce 10 million or 12 million or 15 million barrels a day for 50 to 100 years. Our 260 billion barrels of proven reserves, there’s this conservative number we can easily add another 200 billion, and we can still add another 200 billion we have yet to discover”. And I actually think that they believe that, which is far more dangerous than “it’s just a political statement.” <8:18>

JIM: Now the thesis of your book is Saudi production is very near its peak...

MATT: I decided that this book was going to be so controversial that I really tried my darnedest to avoid a bunch of very specific conclusions that people could shoot holes in them: “how would you know that?” But I’ve had enough time now to reflect on everything I wrote about, and also feedback from lots of technical people that said, “you know what, what you triggered in the memory of what was going on in the 70s”, and etc, etc. I think it’s highly likely that they’ve actually exceeded sustainable peak production already. And I think at the current rates they are producing these old fields, each of the fields risks entering into a rapid production collapse.<9:03>

JIM: If this is indeed the case then, by assumption, we have to assume global peak is at hand then.

MATT: Absolutely. Once it’s clear that Saudi Arabia cannot sustain increases in its production on a sustained basis, then in my opinion, with a certainty of 99.9% the world has actually passed sustainable peak production. Because one of the reasons all of these supply models always have Saudi Arabia producing 25 million bpd by 2025 is that there isn’t another country on earth that has the potential to raise their production more than 1 or 2 million bpd at best. <9:41>

JIM: Why is it, do you think, there’s only been 2 groups that have been concerned with this: you have the oil company executives, because they are obviously looking around the globe and they’re not finding major elephants on a yearly basis; and then we’ve had environmentalists who have also been concerned about this. Those have been the main 2 groups, but aside from that, you have a third group, the economists, who basically just say, “as the prices of oil goes up the production goes up to meet it.”

MATT: Yes, and they say it with a passion and a vengeance. What I’ve also found so interesting is that the concept of peak oil which is finally getting some serious traction as a discussion item gets scorned by economists – energy economists. What they hear is the world is running out of oil, they don’t understand the concept of peak oil. And I continue to remind people that the difference between oil supply peaking and running out of oil is as profound as someone saying, “I’m getting a little bit hungry,” and someone saying, “I have about 2 more minutes to live before I starve to death.” And we will never run out of oil, in our lifetime, our children’s lifetime, our grandchildren’s lifetime. But by 2030 we could easily have a world that can only produce 10 or 15 or 20 million barrels per day, and the shortfall from what we thought we were going to produce is only a modest 100 million barrels per day. So this is really a major, major, major global issue. <11:10>

JIM: It’s not only a major issue, but if you look at Wall Street, the day you and I are speaking, oil is over $62/barrel and the standard response is – in fact, one of the questions given to one of the analysts this morning is “when is it coming down?”...

MATT: “Why is it so high and when is it coming down?” <11:31>

JIM: You gave an analogy in terms of how cheap oil is at $60/barrel, I wonder if you might share that with our listeners?

MATT: Sure. Because every time I get into a discussion now about the future of oil I always get asked, “well, where will oil prices be?” And my response is, “I don’t have any idea where they’re going to be, other than the fact I think on a secular move, we are still at a very, very cheap level of oil prices.” And that immediately gets a response, “Cheap?! Oil’s at $60 a barrel!” And one of the things I’ve observed is that people don’t really understand what a barrel is. They can kind of conceive what a barrel might look like. But when you put it in terms people can understand, I say “what $60 per barrel is, is 18 cents a pint.”

And then I get a response, “How did you do that?!”

“Well, you divide 60 by 42, to get a gallon of oil, and you divide a gallon by 8 to get a pint of oil, and that just happens to be 18 cents a pint.”

And then they say, “ Oh, that’s really cheap, isn’t it?”

And obviously it’s cheap. I don’t know what’s the next cheapest liquid we actually sell in any bulk is, that has any value. I suspect there are places around the United States where municipal water costs more than 18 cents a pint. And yet for some reason, we created a society that was built on a belief that oil prices in a normal range were some place in the $15-20 level. It turns out $15/barrel, which is the average price of oil – in 2004 dollars – it sold for, for the last 140 years, is less than 4 cents a pint. So we’ve basically used up the vast majority of the world’s high flow rate, high quality sweet oil at prices that were effectively so cheap, you basically couldn’t sustain an industry. And now we’re left with lots of oil. But it’s heavy, gunky, dirty, sour, contaminated with various things oil, it doesn’t come out of the ground very fast, is very energy intensive to get out of the ground and we’re going to pay a fortune for it. <13:42>

JIM: Why don’t you take us back, as we talk about this peak in oil in Saudi Arabia, to when oil was first discovered. Give us a little bit of background about Saudi Arabia, because up until 1930 there really wasn’t an issue in Saudi Arabia. How did they emerge as a global energy power?

MATT: First of all, just a real quick history of oil because I think it’s actually interesting to put into present context."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. I think your right and this is a feeble attempt to keep their
position of power for as long as they can!!!

Its a political statement NOT a fact!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
58. Hybrids scare them. Hybrids with a plug-charge option for the battery
terrify them. The average commute for American is 30-40 miles per day. That's what you can get out of a bank of old battery technology. New batteries, soon to be on the market, will allow you to charge your battery to 80 percent capacity in minutes.
We don't need them. If we don't put that shit in our cars, the demand goes WAY down.
We don't need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuck55 Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. what's the attraction to hybrids?
I love them in theory, but are they really better if the electricity to charge them comes from fossil fuel fired power plants? I don't mean this sarcasticaly, but i guess in terms of fossil fuels consumed overall/kpl (mpg). I'm assuming that power plants can convert fossil fuels to electricity cheaper than refineries can convert crude into gas, and that wouldn't include hydro/nuclear/solar/wind sources. I'd love to find that they are indeed a better choice, and then i could petition for them to make one with a storage bed like the 'Ute's' everywhere in Australia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. Dirty sulfur coal can be gasified into hydrogen and carbon monoxide (CO).
CO has almost as much energy in it as hydrogen. The carbon dioxide can be sequestered in the ground. So yes, there is a way to use fossil fuel more cleanly. But even if we just use the electrical generation capability we currently have, it moves us away from foreign oil. If we move away from foreign oil, we don't travel the globe killing people... as much. That is the first goal. Stop the bloodshed. If we stop spending our money on that, we'll have plenty to figure out the rest. The solutions are there. We just need the will. The will comes from higher gas prices. I say, Bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. We may not need as much oil someday, but china and india will
And perhaps in some odd way this message was not meant for profit, it may have been more aimed at holding off what some see as a potential war erupting over less and less oil - china has the power to take it, so do we, and so on. If we all believe there is more tensions could ease.

Now I am probably off in happy fairy land on all this, but having been around some politics in my life I can see this as one possibility (which * may well be behind, delay the issue until near election time, then it comes to a head, and he somehow either stays in power or his cronie gets elected while he retires to a bunker with booze).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
59. Damn...
... we're gonna be up to my ass in oil and now I'm stuck with this fucking Prius!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. Subtle!
I like it!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
62. They like like ALL members of the Bush Crime Family
which they are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. Exactly. Double the reserves means double the "credit app."
No one lives the high life like the Saudis, exceptin' the younger members of the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-05 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
65. AUDIT!
Gets some auditors in there! Ooops, it's a dictatorship? Well, we'll just take their word for it, because they are our bestest buddies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
67. Exxon owns the world!
Just kidding...they only own 13% of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC