Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP (Pincus): Intelligence Report for Iraq War Was "Hastily Done"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:12 PM
Original message
WP (Pincus): Intelligence Report for Iraq War Was "Hastily Done"
By Walter Pincus

At the center of the political debate over the intelligence preceding the war in Iraq is the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) -- the 100-page, top secret document that hurriedly pulled together judgments from across the U.S. intelligence community about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein and the potential dangers involved in an invasion.

Such estimates are usually requested by the White House and take months to prepare, with the CIA and other elements of the U.S. intelligence community weighing their own information and working out disagreements after review and debate. But this one was rushed into production only after requests from Democratic senators who were being asked to give President Bush authorization to go to war.

"The NIE was hastily done in three weeks," one senior intelligence expert said. "It was a cut-and-paste job, with agencies and officials given only one day to review the draft final product when they usually take months. . . . Today they still disagree on the meaning of what came out."

As the Bush administration built its case for war against Iraq in the fall of 2002, a thorough NIE would seem to have been crucial: Hussein's reported chemical, biological or nuclear weapons were central to the pro-war argument. Equally important were questions about how likely Hussein was to use such weapons against U.S. troops or worse, the U.S. homeland.

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8830-2003Oct23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad Pincus is re-surfacing this info.
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 10:22 PM by hedda_foil
It sank beneath the waves a couple of months ago. Guess the CIA doesn't want to go softly into that good night now that the Intel Committee has refused to blame the Cheney, Rummy and the cabal.

On edit to add link to thread on AP story about the Intel Committee's findings.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=181518
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. kinda the same way frat boys write term papers
good thing Shrub surrounds himself with the FINEST intellects...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kainah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. A counter strike by the CIA in response to the Senate report
protecting the White House and blaming the intelligence community. Somehow, I can't imagine it's a mere "coincidence" that these two articles will appear in the Post tomorrow. Dana Priest is the White House's go-to person (which makes me convinced she was one of the recipients of the Plame leak) and Pincus is the CIA's.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9230-2003Oct23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC