Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court: Neb. Went Too Far on Sentencing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 01:45 PM
Original message
Court: Neb. Went Too Far on Sentencing
Court: Neb. Went Too Far on Sentencing

By KEVIN O'HANLON
Associated Press Writer

September 30, 2005, 1:24 PM EDT


LINCOLN, Neb. -- State lawmakers went too far during a 2002 special session when they changed the minimum penalty for first-degree murder to life in prison without parole, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled Friday.

The court said the law fell outside the topics specified by the governor when he called the special session, in violation of the state constitution.

The ruling came in a case brought by Louis Conover Jr., who was convicted of first-degree murder for killing his parents with a baseball bat in 2003. Under the new law, Conover was sentenced to two life sentences without the possibility of parole.

"There is no language in the proclamation which can reasonably be construed as authorizing the Legislature to amend a statute pertaining to life imprisonment," Judge Kenneth Stephan said.
(snip/...)

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-life-without-parole,0,690416.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. You brutally murder someone, you go to jail for life.
Seems reasonable to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not to me. There is always the individual case to be considered.
Edited on Fri Sep-30-05 03:23 PM by neweurope
There is always the chance that people will totally change and regret.

There is always the chance that people are being convicted even though they are innocent.

on edit: Those high punishments you have - much, much higher than in other industrialized nations - do absolutely nothing to PREVENT crime. As can clearly be seen by your crime rate which is much higher than that in other Western countries.

---------------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. life in prison is not about change
it's about punihment. i don't have a problem with life in prison for murder. death penalty, yes, life, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neweurope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. *sigh* In Europe sentences are about two things only:
1.) Protecting society, 2.) trying to change the convicted person.

"Punishment" sounds very medieval to me. Crime is usually just too complex for simply wanting to "punish" somebody.

But I am very glad that you are against the death penalty. :hi:

-----------------

Remember Fallujah

Bush to The Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. If it's not about...
...either deterrence or rehabilitation, it is simply an expensive form of entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But that's not what this is about anyway.
I can see where this ruling would make sense. Call a special session for one thing, then do another. Maybe some Reps can't or don't show up, they would have been swindled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The court's simply said due (legislative) process was not followed.
This issue will be revisited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC