Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Asserts He's Helping 9-11 Commission

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:09 PM
Original message
Bush Asserts He's Helping 9-11 Commission
Edited on Mon Oct-27-03 05:12 PM by Mike Niendorff
Bush Asserts He's Helping 9-11 Commission
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20031027/ap_on_go_pr_wh/sept_11_bush
By LAURENCE ARNOLD, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - President {sic} Bush said Monday his staff is cooperating with an independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks, but he stopped short of saying whether the White House would hand over top-level papers that may be subpoenaed.

"Those are very sensitive documents," Bush said, adding that White House counsel Alberto Gonzales was working with Thomas Kean, chairman of the commission, on this issue.

...

Bush made his remarks on the sensitive nature of documents while talking to reporters in the Oval Office after a meeting with his top advisers on Iraq.

The president's comments were underscored later by White House press secretary Scott McClellan, who also stopped short of saying the White House will turn over certain papers, such as transcripts of the president's daily terrorism briefings.

(more)

-----


MDN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um...
...he's lying. WHOA! WHAT A SHOCKER!

The facts clearly demonstrate otherwise. He isn't helping, he's stonewalling. Now will someone please sue these bastards for the 911 docs and the energy papers, NOW PLEASE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Up is down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a crock of !@#$!
That's not what I've been reading.

What you trying to hide BULLshy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Working definition of "sensitive information"
Any information, truthful and/or factual, which can be, or is, incriminting and/or embarrassing to the * regime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's A Serial Liar
He slipped up when actually admitted that there are "documents".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Side issue........
I've noticed Yahoo softening the lead-in. Look at the other headlines beneath the Yahoo headline. They all take a much tougher position. "Senate presses".......etc. Yahoo has done this uncountable times. I wonder who writes the headlines for Yahoo and what their agenda is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Definitely an interesting angle to consider.

To play devil's advocate for a moment: this is the first time in a long time that I've seen a headline that doesn't blindly presume Bush's credibility (it doesn't say "Bush assures" or "Bush confirms", but, rather, "Bush asserts" -- the implication being that what Bush says is actually *open to question* (insert collective gasp of shock here :) )). I also noticed that the headline author gave Bush the "Clinton treatment" -- referring to him simply as "Bush", rather than as "President Bush" (dropping the authority-conferring title of office -- something the media routinely did to President Clinton during the RW's runup to impeachment).

Eye of the beholder, I guess :)


MDN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is helping...
The commision shouldn't worry their pretty little heads with a whole bunch of boring tough to read government papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. No surprise - Nixon had to turn over the tapes
But that was then, and this is now. No court will order it. Judges are gutless (no Sirica in sight). The papers will be turned over when Ken Lay sees the inside of a jail cell, or the White House leaker is held responsible on the CIA incident. In other words, never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mike: the {sic}. LOL! C'est maqnifique!
Pardon my French. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. "I'm helpin da Comishion"
<sound of paper shredder>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Jerry Lundegard: "I - I'm cooperatin' here! Geez!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is, of course,...
full of shit.

They brought Kean in to head the commission because they figured he's a reliable Republican who wouldn't make waves.

Well, ex-gov Kean ain't ex-gov Whitman-- he's always had an independant streak and the stones to back it up. He's been making a lot of waves about the White House stonewalling, and a lot of threatening noises.

Kean's one of those rare Republicans I have a soft spot for. He's a pretty straight-up and reasonable guy. And nobody's fool.

(It scares me that he might run for the Senate one day, and I'll be tempted to vote for him.)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Could Kean be a shill? What's being said by the other comission members?
Do they agree with Kean? Will they be satisfied with what they get from the White House? We need to hear from the Democrats on the comission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. The first part of the headline is accurate: Bush Ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Stupidhead's "assertion" would carry more weight
If the commission agreed that he's cooperating. Funny thing about these sorts of statements -- the speaker doesn't get to characterize his actions, that's up to the other party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC