Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americans Flock to Get on NRA Blacklist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:50 PM
Original message
Americans Flock to Get on NRA Blacklist
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&e=4&u=/nm/blacklist_dc

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Most blacklists are designed to intimidate. But thousands of Americans are clamoring to join one drawn up by the National Rifle Association (NRA).

Actor Dustin Hoffman was so dismayed to find his name missing from the NRA's shadowy 19-page list of U.S. companies, celebrities, and news organizations seen as lending support to anti-gun policies that he wrote to the powerful pro-gun lobby group begging to be included. (Adds explosive device, paragraph 1, 6, easing of movement, 13)

"As a supporter of comprehensive gun safety measures, I was deeply disappointed when I discovered my name was not on the list," Hoffman wrote in a letter to the NRA that was released Tuesday.

<snip>

The NRA initially denied compiling a blacklist as such, saying it was merely responding to members wanting to know which individuals and corporations opposed the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment on the right to bear arms.

...more...

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go Tootise,GO!!!
Dustin Hoffman is so cool, and also very brave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I asked to be included as well!
This has inspired me to send yet another request...I think I might begin to send one or two a day, from now on.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Second amendment
The second amendment relates to state militias. It protects states rights from the federal government. It doesn't give individuals the right to have guns. :mad:

(BTW, I'm not against gun ownership. But I think we need to explore gun safety issues in ways that the NRA won't even consider.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekLife Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. So all the other
amendments in the bill of rights pertain to individuals, but the 2nd doesnt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's why 911 was invented
Just dial 911 and wait to be rescued. No need to defen yourself against bigger and badder intruders. Works for the UK and others. Why not here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Public Enemy said it best: 911 is a joke.
Quite often, the police don't even come (happened to me twice).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Don't mean to feed the troll but...
I'm not against the 2nd amendment BUT I AM DEAD SET AGAINST THE NRA!

Now why don't you 'splain where you're at?

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekLife Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Seeing
other posts from you on some threads leads me to believe you are either a disruptor or off your medication. Not being a fan of banning, I will not hit the alert button. I will leave that to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. I hit it.
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 11:06 PM by RapidCreek
There's a first time for everything. Never thought I'd do it. My motivations were purely defensive, however. Being a responsible gun owner, I find this ignorant, elitist, paranoid screed to be highly offensive. It paints us all as morons.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. It was satire
Nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #50
62. I hit it, too
I REALLY don't appreciate your 'satire' - have you ever been a victim of gun violence? Has anyone in your family been threatened by a gun-weilding nut case?

I don't think more guns are the answer!

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Well, of course, not the 10th,
which reserves unmentioned powers to the states, yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. So, since the 2nd IS a mentioned power
Does that mean that the power of gun ownership ISN'T reserved to the states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Well, gosh, here's the whole thing!

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Seems like this, being "enumerated" binds the feds. Anything else is left to the states. Read it as often as you like, as well as the preamble to this section:

The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution;

So these Amendments restrict the feds.

Whattya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekLife Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. The entire Constitution
is written to restrict the federal government. It is written to LIMIT the powers of the federal government to those enumerated in the Constitution.

Of course, it has gone way beyond the enumerated powers and needs to be reigned in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekLife Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. and the people
Article X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Sigh. Wrong on both counts.
First, the 2nd guarantees INDIVIDUALS the right to "bear" (not OWN) arms in militias. This comes out of English law which only allowed certain classes to "bear" arms or even form militias. You can make a good argument that the right to "bear" arms in a militia should extend to the right to "own" arms, but they are separate things.

As for the 2nd being the only collective right in the BoR, wrong. Freedom of the press and freedom of religion are the same types of rights, namely, they protect the rights of individuals to exercise those rights in collectives. For that matter, so does the right to assemble, since you can't protect the rights of those assembling if you dictate what the assembly may do.

Hope that clears things up. It's quite within the legitimate realm of debate to argue that since the right to "keep and bear" arms in a militia shall not be abridged that any law which prohibits ownership of desired arms for any purpose abridges the right of a citizen to be prepared to bear any arms in a militia he or she sees fit. But the amendment does not explicitly state that. It's an interpretation, though of course Bush and the NRA want to convince you it's fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
41. You be the judge
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
============================================================

I would say that implict is the right to bear arms IN A MILITIA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #41
56. US citizens age 17-45 are members of the militia
There are two recognized forms of the militia, organized and unorganized. The organized form is the National Guard/Coast Guard, while the US Supreme Court has recognized the unorganized militia to consist of all male US citizens age 17-45. That clears things up as to the meaning of militia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. So right now you are exercising your state right to free speech?
As per the 1st Amendment? How can one right in the Constitution be listed as a individual right, and the very next one after it listed as a state right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I added mine
when I first read about it here.

Hahah....I hope everyone who thinks the NRA is a political tool for the GOP does the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Everyone should do this
Go to their site NRA Gun Sluts and beg to be put on the list:

Here's what I said:

"How can I be added to your blacklist? I'll do anything except give you money or vote for a gun-nut! I think Michael Moore is a great filmmaker and I think Charleton Heston is lying about his Alzheimer's (made it up to cover his @ss - he is one heartless bastard)! Please add me right away - you guys are NUTS! Thanks so much"

We need to overwhelm their servers.

Tut-tut

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
54. Here is my request for the honor to be included in the blacklist
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 11:37 PM by RapidCreek
Hello,

I understand you have compiled a list of individuals who believe in laws which ensure sane and responsible gun ownership. I am a gun owner and concure with those on your list. I request the honor of being included.

My name is ****** *****. I am a writer and artist. I've done stunt double work in made for TV productions and have acted in several films. You can see me at my best in Planes Trains and Automobiles. I'm credited as *** *** *****.

Sincerely,

****** *****
--------------------------------------------------------------------

P.S. The actual email for the GUN SLUTS aka National Redneck Association is https://secure.nraila.org/contactUs.asp The above email won't work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. Thanks
My mistake!

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm on da list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a wonderful idea!
Let's get all Democrats across the country to get back on the anti-gun side where we belong and we'll be sure to sweep the nation with Democratic victories in 2004!

Go anti-gun ownership platforms!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. It ain't a Democrat/Republican isseu
Just ask Nancy Reagun or James Brady. It's not a platform either...just common sense. By the way...is Brady on that list?

RC
former gun owner
recent gun purchaser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. There's a huge difference...
between being anti-gun and anti-NRA - such a subtle nuance would be lost on a freeper, though.

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. You just don't get it
How many more elections are you willing to lose because you don't understand that tormenting the NRA members is a lost cause?

Tut-tut whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. So the NRA
is the majority vote in this country?

WHOA!!!! They must be WAY underreporting their membership numbers, man.

According to these folks, there's only about 3.6 million of 'em! Heck, there's two million in prison!
http://www.packing.org/news/article.jsp/1521
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I'm only going on what I saw happen in 2000
Something happened with pro vs anti gun owners. I don't know if it was the NRA or the PTA but I saw an uprising. I feel any mention of restricting gun ownership of law abiding Americans is going to bite us in the ass. That's my take on it and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Ri-i-ight...
what I saw in 2000 was the election being stolen by BushCo... so it was actually a backlash of voters who elected Gore: wow! Who knew?

Tut-tut yo mama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Is that all you saw?
Did you really not see the backlash against those that wanted to register and restrict gun owners? Ignorance is the downfall of most groups that seek victory from those they least understand.

It may feel good to trash an enemy but it is no replacement for victory. Sorry you can't see what I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. So let me get this straight:
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 09:11 PM by Tuttle
You like guns because...? Are you a Bush supporter? Did you vote for him last time around, because he wouldn't make you register your wittle gun?

I got news for you bud: Bush is a liar - not Gore, not Saddam - Bush! I wouldn't trust Bush, if I were you.

Especially if you don't feel safe without your gun!

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Get it straight
I voted libertarian in 2000 because Bush and Gore did nothing for me.

You have no news for me bud. Bush is your boogy man - not mine.

I want a Dem that trusts me with the 2nd. Stop trying to help rule out a Dem in 2004 so I can vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
42. sorry chief....believing in the right to own fire arms does not make
one a supporter of the Neo Republican Assholes. Lobbying for laws that demand responsible gun ownership is NOT anti-gun, quite the contrary infact. I own a gun...have it registered and use it responsibly....I do not support the NRA. The idiocy of the NRA paints all gun owners as narrow minded morons. A fact which pisses me off to no end.

Does mention of restricting the automobile ownership of law abiding Americans bite anyone in the ass? No....it insures the safe use of autmobiles. Anyone who can't make that distintion is an idiot.

You really need to expand your intellectual abilities beyond the scope of pro and anti. I realize it might be difficult....then again, if you care to be taken seriously by those of us who have, it might warrent your efforts.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Yea whatever.
I've said what needed saying....Getting back to you, is not worth my time.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leanings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. Each one of those members
pays $35 a year in dues. How many people contribute to MMM or Brady or the VPC?

The NRA is a powerful lobby for a reason. It's got a lot of members who're willing to put their money where their mouths are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. American citizens
pay considerably higher dues than that and thier numbers constitute a hell of allot more power at the voting booth than those of the National Redneck Association. Get over it.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #29
57. The power of the NRA is not measured solely by their membership numbers
Though they are one of the largest lobbying groups in the nation. The power of the NRA rests on the fact that something like 75-80% of all Americans agree with their basic tenets: that law-abiding citizens have a constitutional right to own firearms and that they should have greater access to them for self-defense. Just look at the past decade's worth of conceal-carry reform laws passed across the country. Can you say that the NRA alone, with only 3.6 million members, was able to get 40 states to enact CCW laws? Many people don't dwell on the small issues the NRA supports or opposes, just the basic message sent. The NRA, whether you love em or hate em, are damn good at getting their message out to large numbers of people and swaying votes among many people who are not NRA members. You tell the 75% of Americans that a particular politician is out to take away a constitutional right and the people will get upset, whether they own a gun or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. Excuse me chief...but I don't recall anyone compiling a blacklist of
Edited on Wed Oct-29-03 11:05 PM by RapidCreek
NRA members. That which the NRA claims to fear and hate, it engages in, itself. This is a common scenario for those who erroneously assume that the rest of society operates from their own twisted frame of reference. Fortunately the rest of society does not.

A group which collects a list of the names of people it fears and encourages its members to engage in reactionary behavior against those people, is elitist, paranoid and dangerously psychotic. Particularly when this groups prime objective is the unrestricted ownership of deadly weapons.

Like I said in an earlier post....the NRA does responsible gun owners no service with it's idiotic paranoid ranting. Such behavior gives credence to the belief that gun owners are psychos. Arguments to support it do the same. So I'd ask that you refrain from your screed on this board....many of us here are responsible gun owners....WE DON'T WAN'T OR NEED WHAT YOU MISTAKENLY CONSTRUE TO BE A CLEVER SORT OF HELP! We are real Americans and believe in the power of our Constitution....sadly, niether, it would seem, apply to you.

To the mods....Feel free to delete my post if it falls outside the boundaries of posting rules. I've had enough of this shit and have responded as civilly as my conscience will allow.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
52. Have you noticed -
the large number of low-post Dem-bashers today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #52
59. yes - admins must be running low on tombstones
n/t

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's a Little Big Man, or perhaps just a big man!!!
Thanks for standing up for what is right, Dustin!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Two Toots for Tootsie! (Rate the article)
oooooo, I wanna be on the black list too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Goodie
I am now on the list...

By the way, black lists loose their terror factor when
people flock to them

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let's turn this around even further............
"National Rifle Association Executive Vice-President Wayne LaPierre said of the list last week; "Our members don't want to buy their songs, don't want to go to their movies, don't want to support their careers."


SO, all the of the public figures whose names are NOT on the list... do we as anti-NRAers play tit for tat and not go to their movies or buy their cds or support their careers?

Meaning, we should turn this around BIG TIME. Let's target the public figurse who are NOT on the blacklist, ask why they aren't on it, and then seek to undermine their careers!

Yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Even better yet!
Let's see who can be most anti-gun ownership in the Democratic debates and then really go anti-gun during the Bush debates next Fall!

Talk about bringing out the voters! That will really get the voters out to vote against gun ownership. Why didn't we think of this before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Duh yea huhuhuhu
That would be really cool, huhuhuhu.

:puffpiece:

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evworldeditor Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Want an AK-47?
I love Wes Clark's response to the gun control question. He said if you want to shoot an assault rifle, join the Army. "They've got lots of them," he replied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. What about those Americans that are too old to join or defend themselves?
Should we at least give them free cell phones to dial 911 if they need defended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Nah, let's face it, by the time
the old farts are that useless, throw 'em to the wolves!

(Ya read about it all the time, right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
46. If they can afford a Mini 14 with a 32 shot clip they can afford a phone.
RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burntbuckwheats Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Nice slogan for 2004 in middle America
I suggest you don't use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E_Zapata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. LMAO - go to the blacklist site......HIlarious!
www.nrablacklist.com

Great western song that has to be the NRA theme song. FUNNY.

That bushflash guy should use that song for a flash.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leanings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. That's damn good.
I wonder what the song is?

Unfortunately the website is pretty typical of the Brady Campaign/MMM. The two "outrages" listed are both, at the mininum, very misleading statements. I don't really see the big deal about a "blacklist", either; does anybody here support corporations or individuals that give support to causes you're against? I try not to.

The website is also a pretty typical attempt by MMM and the BC to make it appear as tho some new grassroots pro-control group has come to be. The website is "Sponsored by StoptheNRA.com", which in term is nothing more than a BC/MMM shill. Pretty sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
44. The nasty NRA folks, the fundies and the rabid right wingers are going
to end up hating everyone on the planet soon. They will have to live in caves by themselves pretty soon because they have boycotted the rest of the human race. Funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. ROFLMAO!!!!................This is just too funny!!!
:toast: to Hoffman!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. That's a real hoot alright.
"I was particularly surprised by the omission given my opposition to the
loophole that makes it legal for 18- to 20-year-olds to buy handguns at
gun shows," he added.

Someone needs to give the "Raiman" a clue.

K-k-kmart B-b-b-bullets, suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-29-03 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. I'm for Dean, but, I'm for this NRA blacklist!
I even got a call 3 years ago...just prior to the 2000 election...a pre-recorded message urged me to go to the polls and vote against Gore..."cuz he was going to take away the guns and rights of all 'Mericans"!

Well, DUH!!!

:nuke:

(DU doesn't have a gun emoticon...so, I had to use this one! :-))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
61. Reminds me of Nixon's Enemies List
Everyone wanted to be on it and were a bit hurt if they didn't make it. Go Hoffman! That's the way to take away the power of evil organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC