This is a cover up of the original Saeed Sheik story who was the alleged bagman for Mohammed Atta. The problem was that the Indian government reported Omar Saeed Sheik to be the go between for the Pakistani ISI which everyone knows works hand in glove with the CIA. How embarassing! Then he became the killer of Daniel Pearl. How was that arranged? Pearl's leads came from people in the US. What bad advice he got! Also Khalid was reported killed in a raid on the apartment of Binalshibh in Pakistan several months before he was "captured."
I knew the Khalid story was fishy when I saw the pictures in the press alleged to be the "mastermind." They are a completely different person. You notice this story doesn't run the imposters picture at the time of capture but the file pictures. I have little doubt that Khalid was involved in the 911 conspiracy in some way. Perhaps as a Lee Harvey. The only problem is he wasn't captured, he was killed and his wife confirmed it according to the earlier reports. Perhaps, the first story about his death was false. The one thing I will say is that the description of his capture is convincing, but the fat slob in the t shirt with long greasy hair isn't Khalid. I don't care how bad someone looks when rousted out of bed, it isn't him. You can tell (from the pictures) Khalid fancies himself as a gentlemen of sorts and has bearing. Hence the mastermind label. This guy that was captured appeared to be a slob.
In any case, it was nice to see that someone is keeping track of the disinformation or rabbit trails being passed off as fact by the media, here and abroad. Check out this Canadian source:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.htmlThere's Something About Omar:
Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11
by Chaim Kupferberg
www.globalresearch.ca , 21 October 2003
The URL of this article is:
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.html <Abu Hamza's role as an Islamic fundamentalist recruiter (along with that of his counterpart in Hamburg, Mohammed Haydar Zammar - the recruiter of Atta and Binalshibh) must be judged in the light of present demographic realities. And the reality is this: with a population in excess of one billion adherents, and a geographic span that stretches from the West African Straits of Gibraltar to the far east of Asia, the Muslim World apparently was not up to the task of furnishing the most hardcore, sophisticated operative cells of al-Qaida... Rather, the peculiarly sophisticated strain of Muslim terror that has been branded as al-Qaida was largely incubated among an insular network in the U.K. and the E.U., where a conveniently incriminating trail could be tracked and showcased as definitive proof of the authorship for 9/11.>
<Only weeks before his July 15, 2002 article on Binalshibh, Finn had played his part in structuring the news regarding the man who had allegedly recruited Binalshibh and other members of the "Hamburg cell" into the ranks of Islamic fundamentalism - Mohammed Haydar Zammar. On June 12, 2002 - that is, just a week after Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was introduced as the new 9/11 mastermind - Finn introduced Zammar as the "charismatic advocate" who had cast his spell over Atta, Binalshibh, and their Hamburg-based colleagues - in much the same way that Abu Hamza had worked his magic on his British charges. >
<And, like Abu Hamza, Zammar was likewise allowed to carry on freely in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 while the German and British authorities were rounding up suspects by the dozens. According to Der Speigel, German intelligence agents had approached Zammar in 1996, offering to recruit him as an informer. Zammar reportedly declined the offer, and then - as reported by Finn - "around 1997, Atta and others in the Hamburg-based group, who already had anti-Western views, fell under Zammar's influence." >
<The $64,000 question, however, is whether Zammar - and British recruiter Abu Hamza - did in fact fall under the influence of any intelligence service. ..>
Sorry, it's 85 pages long. File it away for future reference.