Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ARNOLD ACCUSER WANTS MSNBC APOLOGY (Scarborough)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:06 PM
Original message
ARNOLD ACCUSER WANTS MSNBC APOLOGY (Scarborough)
A woman who accused Arnold Schwarzenegger of groping her is now threatening to sue MSNBC and possibly host Joe Scarborough.
Lawyers for Rhonda Miller, a Hollywood stunt double who appeared in at least two of Schwarzenegger's films, have sent MSNBC a legal letter.

"We think an appropriate retraction would be for Scarborough to state uncategorically that any statements that Rhonda Miller was a felon or had a criminal record . . . are false," said Miller's lawyer, Paul Hoffman.

...On the Oct. 6 edition of "Scarborough Country," Kim Serafin, a conservative talk-show host and MSNBC analyst, accused Miller of being convicted of multiple drug and prostitution charges.

The allegations were soon proved to be false after it was learned that a different woman with the same name and lengthy criminal past had been misidentified in a memo leaked to the media.

http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/9452.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh yeah...
Rhonda Miller is certainly a unique name, unlike my nick, for instance. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Scarbutt should know all about criminal activity
murder of an intern comes to mind. MSNBC should be boycotted for hiring a murderer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. please elaborate?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:35 PM
Original message
A Dead Intern Was Found In Congressman Scarborough's Office
Someone else will be along shortly with a link.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Okay...
A Death in the Congressman's Office
Does Anybody in the Press Care About Lori Klausutis?

<http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010808Klausutis.html>

Excerpt:

"Three Pivotal Questions
by the Editors
September 1, 2001 (APJP) -- Over at The American Prospect's message board thread concerning this very article, Phoenix Woman has asked a trolling Scarborough "defender" three pivotal questions. We'd love to know the answers ourselves:

1) If Lori's death was just a simple accident, then why did Rep. Scarborough and his spokesman Miguel Serrano feel the need to go to two different local TV stations within three hours of her body's being found and invent a nonexistent history of chronic medical conditions for
her -- in other words, why did they feel the need to lie about Lori's health?

2) Would you trust without question the word of a Medical Examiner who lost his ME license in two separate states (Missouri and Florida) because he LIED about his autopsy work (for instance, saying he had autopsied some brains when he hadn't)?

3) Why should whoever wrote Ms. Klausutis's obituary feel it was appropriate to mention nearly everything about her life -- EXCEPT where she'd been working since 1999?"

MY NOTE: Shortly after these incidents took place, hard-right Scarborough held an emotional press conference and announced that he was not seeking reelection. This was also very curious, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Memo leaked to the press
hmm. Let's see...The campaign knew that she wasn't the person, put it in a memo anyway and leaked it. Voila, Scarbarough had his source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That "cwazy" liberal media at work again
An intern turns up missing and you had nothing to do with it, you get 24/7 coverage and lose you congressional seat. An intern is found DEAD in your office and you get a show on MSNBC.

Who do I need to kill, or what kind of illegal drugs do I need to abuse so that I can get a chance to make millions while spewing forth the Repuke propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ain't that the truth!
Who do you have to kill or what drugs do you have to take (enmasse) in this town to get a talkshow gig? Oh wait, it only applies to Rs and not Ds... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shooga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Three questions for Joe:
1) If Lori's death was just a simple accident, then why did Rep. Scarborough and his spokesman Miguel Serrano feel the need to go to two different local TV stations within three hours of her body's being found and invent a nonexistent history of chronic medical conditions for her -- in other words, why did they feel the need to lie about Lori's health?

2) Would you trust without question the word of a Medical Examiner who lost his ME license in two separate states (Missouri and Florida) because he LIED about his autopsy work (for instance, saying he had autopsied some brains when he hadn't)?

3) Why should whoever wrote Ms. Klausutis's obituary feel it was appropriate to mention nearly everything about her life -- EXCEPT where she'd been working since 1999?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Won't happen. Remember? Faux won a court case which said
that Faux can lie.

End of lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Not so fast...
Fox News loses attempt to block satirist's book
<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/08/22/fox.franken/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. This reminds me of the purging of names in Florida in 2000
without even checks to see if there was a mistaken identity.

My understanding is that it was the responsibility of the various polling districts to do the checking. One area checked only when the pollster's name was on it.

She should sue, get some backing from Soros or a big money backer like Scaife funded Paula Fox(I think was her name) and sue MSNBC and that sleazy, steroid use gone wrong, bastare, Arnold.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack The Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Does this guy have a call-in show?
Boy I would love to ask him some of those questions the poster above mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. California libel lawyer checking in here
and assuming this Hollywood stunt woman lives in Cal and would file here, this would be a pretty good case. The law requires that a news organization be given a prompt demand to retract, which they then have a short time (month to month and a half) to publish the retraction. If they do retract, then most of the damages go away as against MSNBC and JS. Look for this retraction, because Cal libel laws are excellent for plaintiffs when accused of criminal conduct. If the Schwarzenegger campaign passed the memo, look for them to be sued anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarNoMore Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. MSNBC
Have any of you checked the homepage of Kim Serafin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. no. have you?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. ok, i just looked
she seems like your basic attractive but braindead blonde right wing media whore. other than that, nothing seems strange. what did i miss?

http://www.kimserafin.com/

her website is slow and clunky.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarNoMore Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. blonde tight wing media whore
You got it. She seemed to suddenly pop up a lot during the Arnold ordeal. I just thought her backgroung was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Yes...here's several links...
...bio with photo:
<http://www.kimserafin.com/>

...bio without photo:
<http://www.kimserafin.com/about.html>

...acting credits:
<http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/PersonDetail/personid-26382>

...Republican Babe of the Week (w/Clark for Pres banner ad):
<http://www.jerseygop.com/RepublicanBabes16.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Being a friend to the Imperial Family
means NEVER having to say your sorry.

It also means you casn murder your aide in the office and get away with it scot-free, then get your own TV show on an Imperial Network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Go For It, Rhonda!
Get those Suckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-30-03 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. The nice thing about this story
if it gets some press, is that it reminds the world of the groping charges. I would hate for them to be forgotten. This could bring it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC