Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFP:US propaganda aimed at foreigners reaches US public: Pentagon document

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:04 AM
Original message
AFP:US propaganda aimed at foreigners reaches US public: Pentagon document
(How much you want to bet that most of this is posted in U.A.E Newspapers, that's my bet.)

US propaganda aimed at foreigners reaches US public: Pentagon document


27/01/2006 05h39

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The Pentagon acknowledged in a newly declassified document that the US public is increasingly exposed to propaganda disseminated overseas in psychological operations. But the document suggests that the Pentagon believes that US law that prohibits exposing the US public to propaganda does not apply to the unintended blowback from such operations....

(clip)

...Called the "Information Operations Roadmap," the document was approved by US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in October 2003. It was made public by the National Security Archives, a private non-profit research group which obtained it through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The document said that psychological operations, or "psyops," are restricted by Pentagon policy and executive order from targeting US audiences, US military personnel and news agencies and outlets. "However, information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and PSYOP, increasingly is consumed by our domestic audience and vice-versa."

In a press release, the National Security Archives said the document "calls for 'boundaries' between information operations abroad and the news media at home, but provides for no such limits and claims that as long as the American public is not 'targeted,' any leakage of PSYOP to the American public does not matter." Pentagon spokesman Lawrence DiRita vehemently denied that the Pentagon was unconcerned about possible blowback. "I reject the premise of this release which is, 'Hey if it bleeds back we're okay with it.' We're not okay with it," he said.

(more at link below)

<http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/060127051408.xz5wrxke.html>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. We blow that shit right back and call it out every time on DU
However, the shit brain freeps, and so on, buy it 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jessica Lynch?
remember how nothing in the original story turned out to be remotely true?

Where did that come from? Honest error?

Pat Tillman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rebuilding schools, friendly locals, benevolent generals
taking and interest in civic affairs, giving a helping hand, 1000/1 kill ratio, local police backing the troops.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Afghan girls and their bright yellow pencils
only problem..their teachers get beheaded in front of them ..and their schools get demolished..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. What's really funny, in a rogueish fashion,
is the amazing number of idiots who still believe and insist that, despite ample debunking, the Jessica Lynch fable is true and that Sadaam really was found hiding in a "spider hole." The ability of the human mind to suck in absolute crap and thrive on it is beyond understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. bleeding blowback--now that is concept to wrap your head around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Leakage of PSYOP....?
so that's what we're calling televised news these days. "PSYOP Leakage"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Amazing, huh.
Un-believeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. So, when does Rummy hold his next "news" briefing? I want to see this one.
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 02:08 AM by Up2Late
Here's the link to the National Security Archive briefing on this: <http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/index.htm>

<http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/info_ops_roadmap.pdf>

And a bit of what's there:



"The likelihood that PSYOP messages will be replayed to a much broader audience, including the American public, requires that specific boundaries be established for PSYOP. In particular:



The discussion of the relationship between public diplomacy and IO neither cites the applicable legal restrictions nor institutes specific guidelines, but references only the "intent" of the U.S. government in "targeting" either foreign or domestic audiences:



(much more at the links below)

<http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/index.htm>

<http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB177/info_ops_roadmap.pdf>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rummy did say he was only giving the name back, not the program
Guess he was serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. I've the vapours! Get me the salts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
10. That means that foreigners are receiving OUR propaganda as well!
It's a Pandora's Box.

Information...information everywhere, but n'er a drop of truth to drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Screw the military
I never trust anything from the military, especially anything relating to the almighty "Zarqawi." LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. and it's the Lincoln Group propaganda
WASHINGTON - A secret military program that pays Iraqi newspapers to publish information favorable to the U.S. mission appears to violate a 2003 Pentagon directive, according to a newly declassified document released Thursday.

The information campaign run by U.S. troops in Baghdad and a private contractor called Lincoln Group is currently the subject of a high-level military investigation. Last month, the top U.S. general in Iraq said that a preliminary investigation into the program found that it does not violate U.S. law or Pentagon regulations.

"We concluded that we were operating within our authorities and the appropriate legal procedures. And so we have not suspended any of the processes up to now," Army Gen. George Casey told reporters then.

A secret directive on the Pentagon's information operations policy released Thursday, however, appears to prohibit U.S. troops from conducting psychological operations (PSYOPs) targeting the news media.

more:http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/world/13725426.htm?source=rss&channel=cctimes_world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. Here's a radical concept:
TELL THE TRUTH! Overseas, here at home, everywhere. The rest of the world doesn't believe the propaganda anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The propaganda serves to obfuscate. That is a favorite word
in this Admin. The TRUTH will never be told, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. We have a new catagory of propaganda called the psyoops
Oops. Did we brainwash America. We didn't mean to. That's a psyoops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. I thought we agreed at the beginning of the Bush Administration
that we weren't going to go through with the Ministry of Disinformation for this very reason?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. But, did you really believe these"though criminals" when they said...
...they would close the Pentagon's office of Dis-info? I didn't.

Best to just remember these two rules:

1) Everything (fill in a current member of the Bush Cabal's name here) says is a lie.

2) And when that "person" tells you that they are lying, that to is a lie. :crazy:

If you ever saw the "I Mudd" episode from the original "Star Trek," you'll know what I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostexpectation Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why is proganda ok overseas?
proganda implies bias and lies of omission if not outright lies

why is it ok to do that in a war situation or not?

well perhaps cos general media doesn't seemed to concerned with the truth either?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. Can't these people just NOT lie? Don't they know how precious
credibility is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Nope. I think most of them in our current Government are Pathological
liars. I truly think this government would collapse if they ever tried to come clean with us.

It's sort of like trying to stop and turn around an Aircraft Carrier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:07 PM
Original message
US plans to 'fight the net' revealed
A newly declassified document gives a fascinating glimpse into the US military's plans for "information operations" - from psychological operations, to attacks on hostile computer networks.

*snip*

From influencing public opinion through new media to designing "computer network attack" weapons, the US military is learning to fight an electronic war.

*snip*

The "roadmap" calls for a far-reaching overhaul of the military's ability to conduct information operations and electronic warfare. And, in some detail, it makes recommendations for how the US armed forces should think about this new, virtual warfare.

*snip*

Perhaps the most startling aspect of the roadmap is its acknowledgement that information put out as part of the military's psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans.

*snip*

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4655196.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why does this NOT make me feel safer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. Google up 'cnn and psyops' while you can
You'll find CNN and PsyOps article by counterpunch magazine telling just what you've described.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spun_in_montana Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hmm, I thought this might be
old hat, "that information put out as part of the military's psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans."
I mean, how long has FauxSpews and LGF been around?:shrug:
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. ok, all you psyops worriers on DU, reveal yourslaves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. Presuming that the Internet aspect is the new twist, and
that non-computer based information management has probably been practiced by rulers of various hierarchies for thousands of years, whatever they could do at the time, it causes one pause regarding assumptions of knowledge and facts, given that what has come before is always a consideration, especially in issues where absolute establishment of facts is difficult, such as in social issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. There's a big problem with this
Foreign hackers and computer scientists are much more adaptive than the U.S. military.

They would easily counter any attempts by the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dupe!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 18th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC