Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Law Fulfills a Promise to Protect (Great) Lake Waters (Mich)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:09 AM
Original message
Law Fulfills a Promise to Protect (Great) Lake Waters (Mich)
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 09:13 AM by meganmonkey
GOOD NEWS! With our state legislature controlled by pushy Repubs, this was not an easy task for our Dem governor!! :)
(mods: please don't move this to the state forum - this water supply is important to many, many states!)


LANSING -- Michigan finally has rules giving the state oversight of manufacturers, utilities and water-bottling plants that use large amounts of water, fulfilling a commitment it made 20 years ago to protect the water in the Great Lakes basin.

"This is a celebration of something that has been a long time in coming," Gov. Jennifer Granholm said as she signed the bills in front of a mural featuring a pond and marsh at the state historical museum.

Michigan had been the only state in the Great Lakes region that had not enacted laws to regulate large water withdrawals. The new laws were crafted by Republican and Democratic lawmakers, the Granholm administration, environmentalists, businesses and farmers.

Now that the legislation has been signed into law, Granholm said she plans to lift a moratorium she placed on new or expanded bottled-water operations in Michigan.

more.... http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060301/NEWS06/603010430/1008



PIRG Press Release:



Governor Signs Landmark Water-Use Protections Into Law
First-of-its-kind Legislation is Culmination of 15-month Campaign

LANSING – Governor Granholm, joined by PIRGIM and other members of Michigan’s environmental community, signed a landmark package of water-use bills today, bringing long overdue protections to Michigan’s waters.

“From now on, anyone with a pipe and a pump can’t just help themselves to our most precious public resource,” said PIRGIM Advocate Kelly Dardzinski. “For the first time, we have a set of laws in place to protect our water from exploitation. We thank the Governor and legislators like Representative Jack Brandenburg and Senator Patty Birkholz who came together to make this happen, for all of us and for future generations.”

Throughout the campaign, PIRGIM talked with over 54,000 Michiganders, delivered nearly 9,000 postcards to legislators, held over 100 meetings with legislators, and collaborated with more than fifty business, environmental, and religious organizations to advocate for strong legislation. In addition, PIRGIM wrote and distributed the report “Left Out to Dry,” a case study of how Michigan’s lax water use laws harmed citizens and natural resources.

“Water use in Michigan was a free-for-all, and citizens and our natural resources were paying the price,” said Dardzinski. “These laws contain common-sense standards to prevent overuse and abuse of Michigan’s water and the Great Lakes.”

The final bill package includes significant protections, such as:
• An immediate prohibition against new large-scale water withdrawals that cause adverse resource impacts to trout streams. This prohibition will expand to protect all Michigan’s waters in two years.
• A permit requirement for new large-scale water withdrawals.
• An additional, more stringent permit requirement for new large water-bottling projects, including a requirement that the projects include plans to remedy any measurable impacts.
• A legislative approval requirement for water diversion projects if the current Michigan law against diversions is overturned.
• A requirement that each sector of industry develop water conservation standards.

Although the legislation exempts water in containers smaller than 5.7 gallons from being considered a diversion and thus subject to legislative approval, the resource-protection and public input requirements imposed on new large water-bottling facilities are believed to be the toughest of their kind in the nation. While PIRGIM believes that any water leaving the Great Lakes basin should receive legislative approval, these laws will provide real, immediate protections for vulnerable inland waterways by requiring new water bottling companies to meet stronger protection standards and receive more public input than any other user.

“Thanks to this legislation, special interests will no longer be able to treat Michigan’s water as their own private wells, and Michigan’s residents and resources will no longer have to foot the bill for irresponsible water use,” concluded Dardzinski. “It is truly a historic moment for Michigan.”
http://pirgim.org/MI.asp?id2=22422

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cool...
And even tho Michigan is a blue state with blue senators and the bluest of the blue cities, we produce extra-psychotic Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We sure do!
I saw my first TV ad for DeVos for governor :puke:

I really hope Granholm doesn't get scapegoated for the ecenomic woes in our state. We need to keep her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is great news. PIRG has been working on this for years.
they do great work, even if many pols think that they are nothing but an irritant.

Thanks for the heads up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is good news.
I've been worried about the lakes for a while now. Shortly after Engler took office in 1991, the problems with pollution began.
Milliken and Blanchard both took environmentalism very seriously. It's good to see Gov. Granholm following in their footsteps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whew! I was wondering if this would ever happen.
Thanks for this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC