Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ethics Office For Hill Rejected; Senate Panel's Vote Of 11-5 Is Bipartisan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:47 PM
Original message
Ethics Office For Hill Rejected; Senate Panel's Vote Of 11-5 Is Bipartisan
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/02/AR2006030202146.html

A Senate committee yesterday rejected a bipartisan proposal to establish an independent office to oversee the enforcement of congressional ethics and lobbying laws, signaling a reluctance in Congress to beef up the enforcement of its rules on lobbying.

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs voted 11 to 5 to defeat a proposal by its chairman, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), and its ranking Democrat, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), that would have created an office of public integrity to toughen enforcement and combat the loss of reputation Congress has suffered after the guilty plea in January of former lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Democrats joined Republicans in killing the measure.


snip

But Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio), chairman of the Senate's Select Committee on Ethics and a member of Collins's panel, said the ethics panel does not need any help because it is already doing a thorough job of enforcing the chamber's rules. Speaking of the audits and investigations that the office of public integrity would undertake, Voinovich said: "The ethics committee is already doing those things."

Can;t take your eyes off them or they vote to continue their own criminal activity.

START THE FAXES, CALLS AND EMAILS AND GET THIS CHANGED. ALSO MAKE SURE EVERYONE YOU KNOW IS AWARE OF WHO VOTED THIS DOWN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ethics? On Capitol Hill?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2.  Sen. George V. Voinovich = owned by Coal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Doing a job of ethics enforcement?
The same day Abramoff credit cards reveal he paid for a $14,000 trip to Scotland for DeLay.

Let's hope we can purge the GOP in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay...which Dems on that panel voted against it ...and where's the
outcry of all the Dems on this issue? Too scared that with Repugs in control they will use it to go only after Dems? A good excuse but where are there some HEROES on this issue.

Nevermind.....:eyes: Dems could win on this...but no...they are too worried some of their Big Fish could get caught in the Fryer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Leiberman voted for it... Who voted against?
What Dems voted against it? Any of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. name the Dems and vote them out. now.
somebody tell me who they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. not sure how to find out
but one more nom. and we can front page this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Which fucking Dems voted against this??? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. the ones without ethics
assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC