Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NATO commander sounds warning on forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:40 AM
Original message
NATO commander sounds warning on forces
http://feeds.bignewsnetwork.com/?sid=d9c931a8bfb6f25b

The commander of NATO forces says member nations are 25 percent short in their commitments for the alliances' Reaction Force, which is supposed to be fully operational by October.

That statement indicates no change from what U.S. officials were saying before a NATO defense ministers' meeting last month.

General James Jones says he is the one who has the responsibility of declaring on October first that the Reaction Force is operational. And as of now he is not sure whether he will be able to do that. "The NATO response force has gone through a number of milestones thus far and met each one. But this one is a little bit more at risk than I would like, to be perfectly honest. At this point, we have not generated the force in sufficient numbers for me to be comfortable in standing up here and saying we will be successful," he said.

Based on what officials were saying a month ago, there has not been any progress toward filling the NATO Reaction Force's requirements. This to some extent reflects the situation in other NATO projects, with member nations willing to promise to help but slow to spend the money required and commit the troops and other military resources.

"There is great political will to do more, but unfortunately the other side of that coin is that we haven't seen an equal political will to resource more. And that has to be corrected. When NATO decides to do something, and it really wants to do something, it'll generally come together. But you have to go through that process of getting the political will to instruct the military component

more...
Bush is going to use Nato troops to hit Iran I bet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
andypandy Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. NATO RRF for Iran?
no chance, NATO RRF has to be 'greenlighted' by the member states - additionally all NATO forces have a dual command. if the national force commander isn't happy he rings his PM, if the PM says 'don't do it', he doesn't.

and meglomaniacal septics be buggered.

NATO is taking over the Afghanistan taskings, mainly so it can avoid involvement in Iraq and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep ya gottA
WONDER!!!
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC