Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US spacecraft makes nail-biting approach to Mars (Reuters)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:44 AM
Original message
US spacecraft makes nail-biting approach to Mars (Reuters)
(6 month to Mars, now that's fast for a robot, I wouldn't want to make the trip personally though.)

US spacecraft makes nail-biting approach to Mars


Wed Mar 8, 2006 06:08 PM ET

By Dan Whitcomb

PASADENA, California (Reuters) - Jittery NASA scientists waited on Wednesday for the most advanced spacecraft ever sent to another planet to make its risky final approach to Mars, where it is due to return 10 times the data of all previous probes put together. NASA's unmanned Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has traveled some 300 million miles since leaving Earth in August, was due to enter its most delicate phase on Friday. It will try too ease into orbit around Mars, which has defeated two-thirds of all man-made craft sent there.

"We're very excited about the arrival of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter in a couple of days, but my heart rate is going up for a different reason," said Fuk Li, Mars program manager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, referring to the dangerous maneuver.

If the spacecraft succeeds in reaching its planned orbit, which will take another seven months, it could collect a remarkable amount of data in its two-year mission that could help NASA determine where to land rovers and even make early plans for a human landing site on Mars. "What we're really looking for is that sweet spot where we can go down with other instruments and look for evidence of life," said project scientist Richard Zurek.

The vast distance of Mars from Earth and the wild unpredictability of its atmosphere have been fatal to previous missions there. NASA has only a 65 percent success rate in getting space probes to orbit the planet, as opposed to some 80 percent success in landing spacecrafts on its surface. The hard part is getting the robot orbiter -- which is as tall as two-story building and cruising at about 11,000 miles per hour -- to slow down enough to be captured by the planet's gravity.

(more at link below)

<http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=11470301&src=rss/domesticNews>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I dunno
At least you'd know you're in a place where Shrub can't get at you ever again ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unless he cut the budget for your space flight, AFTER you launch...
...that would suck.:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or worse, outsources the mission to Haliburton.

That would vacuum, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought they gave mars port to Dubai? Or was that nasa they gave em?
Who the hell knows.

Good luck on that mars thing though. The only probe I ever launched hurt like hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. that decision was made on a VERY low level
microbial perhaps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. What point is there for humans to go to Mars?
Any scientific data can be just as easily obtained by machine without the risk to human life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Absolutely not true...
Machines cannot think for themselves and cannot respond efficiently to unexpected discovery. They are programmed to look for what we think they might be likely to find. If there is something extraordinary or unexpected, another robot has to be sent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. But what if we find Oil or Gold there?!? How would we keep those...
...blabber-mouth scientists from telling everyone? :sarcasm:

Just kidding. At this point, at our current level of technology, I'd have to agree with you.

Maybe in 20-40 years, when and if we have much fasted and larger inter-planetary spaceships, it might be worth the trip, but with what we have now, no.

Besides, I'm still waiting for my Flying Car!
(Yes. that's the current Issue of Popular Science)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Same reason people climb mountains
because it's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. with you there--but had to say goodbye to my sci-fi childhood
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 01:40 PM by librechik
to make a rational decision about it. We (liberals) do like to explore!

Have you heard about the astronaut who is traveling the speaking circuit to talk about all the junk and particles orbiting earth which will someday make it impossibly dangerous for current spacecraft (especially with human inhabitiants)to leave earth? Even a paint chip becomes a deadly missile at orbital speeds. We are trapping ourselves earthside forever with our eagerness to control space. Ironic, huh?

And don't get me started about extra-atmosphere radiation exposure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Today's the day!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC