Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq hangs 13 insurgents (first executions since invasion)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:51 AM
Original message
Iraq hangs 13 insurgents (first executions since invasion)

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11744259/

Iraq hangs 13 insurgents
Deaths mark first executions of militants since U.S.-led invasion

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq hanged 13 insurgents Thursday, marking the first time militants have been executed in the country since the U.S.-led invasion ousted Saddam Hussein nearly three years ago, the government said.

The Cabinet announcement listed the name of only one of those hanged, Shukair Farid, a former policeman in the northern city of Mosul, who allegedly confessed that he had worked with Syrian foreign fighters to enlist fellow Iraqis to carry out assassinations against police and civilians.

"The competent authorities have today carried out the death sentences of 13 terrorists," the Cabinet statement. It said Farid had "confessed that foreigners recruited him to spread the fear through killings and abductions."

In September, Iraq hanged three convicted murderers, the first executions since the 2003 ouster of Saddam. They were convicted of killing three police officers, kidnapping and rape.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow democracy is working real great in Iraq isn't it!!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Didn't we criticize Saddam for executing "insurgents" against his gov?
didn't we say we invaded to unseat Saddam for his killing of his own people? Silly, silly me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. thats different
why do you hate the baby jesus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. See? Torture DOES work!
And look how open & democratic Iraq now is, thanks to bush-gawd!
RAH! RAH! RAH!

...bloody fucking hell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. "competent authorities"?
They have those in Iraq?

Too bad we can't find any here at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. too bad the State Dept. just released a report on how incompetent
the Iraqi authorities are....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll bet their trial was real fair, too
probably like one of those "trials" during Stalin's years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTF?????
Trials? Only the name of one ? This is so fucked up I don't know what to say. Summary executions. Yep. Nothing like a fundtioning justice system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder how long he was tortured before he confessed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. What a fine example of non-violence for the citizenry.
I'm sure that'll calm everyone down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they are some of the ones that are
killing our troops with ied bombs they got what they deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually the local people believe the occupying troops
Are getting what they deserve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Minority of people
After talking to 3 relatives that have been there the major majority of the Iraqi locals are glad we are there. It is a minority of the people that are causing the problems. According the them, the news for the most part is not really telling what it is really like over there. The insurgents have run out of idiots to do suicide bombing so they are resorting to ied bombs.

I do not know because I have never been there. I find it hard to go against the ones that have been there. They are more believable than those that have not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Most people here don't want to hear that.
I work with several expatriate Iraqi's and they have said the same thing in the past themselves. They're upset that the US has bungled the occupation so badly, but most are still happy that we're there and that Saddam is gone. Very few Iraqi's (a militant minority of Sunni's mostly) actually support the insurgents attacking our troops, since the insurgents have no problem setting bombs that will kill 50 civilians in the hopes that one or two American's will get caught up in it. There have also been many instances where the insurgents will set off one bomb in a crowded place, wait for the police, EMT's, and American military so show up, and then set off an even bigger bomb.

It doesn't get reported much here, but there's also apparently a big lynching issue in Iraq because of all this. The Iraqi people don't trust us to protect them, they consider the Iraqi police to be inept, corrupt, or both, and yet they STILL want the insurgents out of their towns. When suspected insurgents are caught, they're increasingly being beaten and killed by mobs of angry Iraqi's...sometimes while our own soldiers stand by and watch. I even read about one case where several insurgents moved into a village outside Baghdad. The people in the town seized them, tied them all up, and on the orders of their imam, threw them into the river.

It's a pretty screwed up situation over there, and anyone trying to simplify it into an "us vs. them" scenario doesn't have a good grip on what's actually happening. Very few of the people fighting us have the best interests of the Iraqi people at heart...most are trying to push some kind of agenda. Some want Iraq to become an Arab Somalia, with no central government to speak of. Others are looking to set up a vassal state. Others want a Taliban-style strict Islamic nation. Some simply want civil war in the hopes of personally profiting. They do all agree that the American's should leave Iraq, but very few of them are actually interested in what the Iraqi people themselves have to say about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. That's right.
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 03:38 PM by tabasco
People here want to hear the truth.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0429/dailyUpdate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. The truth is they don't want the crusading Yankee Christians in their hous
Kicking in doors and throwing Grandpa to the ground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I have some swampland in Florida for sale.
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 03:37 PM by tabasco
I too have talked to lots of troops who have been there, since I am a troop myself. Plus, I read objective sources from inside Iraq, like the Iraqi bloggers, and international media that are not afraid to walk the streets of the cities.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0429/dailyUpdate.html

The Iraqi people do not want us there. Since we have arrived, there has been neverending bloodshed, instability, and chaos. There is no chance of stability until we unass the AO.

US troops are doing nothing to secure law and order in the cities of Iraq. There's not enough of them in the first place, and it's not a priority mission. Anyone who believes we invaded Iraq for the good of the Iraqi people is a moron.

There are a lot of other people who have been there besides your three relatives. I suggest you investigate what they have to say.

BTW - if you are interested in seeing for yourself:

www.goarmy.com



edit typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Sorry, but they are wrong...
IED's have been in use, and the major weapon of Iraqi resistance fighters, since day one. There have been far more IED attacks than suicide bombings. So if your sources claimed that IED's are a recent development, then that makes them suspect. Also the whole bullshit line about the news media not telling what is really going on over there comes straight from the White House.

In a way, it is right, because the media are trying their damndest not to say how BAD it is, but in the context used by the media and your sources, it is pure spin to cover up the utter failure of the Bush admin and the US military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Maybe.....
But there is a lot more of where that came from. How much longer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. not to mention all the innocent Iraquis killed
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. so if they capture our soldiers then they should execute them? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. You ca n bet they will
just like they are doing to their fellow citizens, women and children included that are not harming them in the least bit.

The insurgents are the minority and they are the bastards doing the brutal killing. They are the ones that have beheaded the reporters.

Go ahead and stand up for them. That is your choice..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
turbo_satan Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Actually, if I'm not mistaken, Iyad Allawi himself was said to have...
... executed a couple of insurgents himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You're not mistaken. Here's a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I recall that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
39. Allawi another Quisling Thug
Guarded by dozens of Black-Water mercenaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Only one named? Line'm up and kill them. New Iraq..same as the old Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I am not a believer in the death penalty--and this is a good example of
why not. To much secrecry in the hands of the 'elected' officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. HANGINGS?????
What the fuck, this is probably the worst way to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. New Hampshire and Washington still allow hangings.
And it's not the worst way to die. Far from it...if everything is calculated correctly, it's instantaneous and painless. It snaps the spinal cord removing all nervous activity, and it compresses spinal fluid into the skull causing instant unconciousness.

The problem with hanging is that it isn't always calculated correctly. Too short on the drop and the person slowly strangles. Too long on the drop and you rip their head off their body. There were enough instances of that happening to cause most states to eliminate it as a method of execution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. NH hasn't executed anyone since the '30's. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. True, but it's on the books. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'll bet that will smooth things over. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. 13 new martyrs
That's how resistance movements usually frame this sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. Finally, Iraqis killing Iraqis - publically!
That's what this Iraq war is all for, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. "listed the name of only one of those hanged"
oh, so its SECRET executions now? this is what bush calls 'freedom on the march'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Please stop calling them "insurgents," they're "resistance fighters."
"Insurgents" implies that, at some point they were satisfied but became insatisifed and rose up.

As the historical record makes clear, Saddam and the Mukhabarat had put a cell-based resistance structure in place before the invasion of March '03. In other words, Saddam and his general staff decided not to fight the war our Pentagon wanted to fight, i.e., one with large set-piece battles a la Desert Storm ca. 1990. Instead, starting in January 2002 (15 months before the invasion), Saddam gave his general staff orders to read up on Vietnam War and adopt "irregular" force structure tactics, a la Viet Cong ca. 1956.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. Finally EXECUTIONS in Iraq...
The Idiot Prince must have a HUGE hardon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. They have hanged 12 people but not released their names?
I think elementary legal principles hold that you should have to identify the people you execute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC