Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Matthews accepted hefty speaking fees from conservative groups

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:05 PM
Original message
Report: Matthews accepted hefty speaking fees from conservative groups
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 07:06 PM by SCRUBDASHRUB
http://rawstory.com/news/2006/Report_posits_that_Chris_Matthews_star_0309.html

<snip>

A new report advanced to RAW STORY Thursday suggests that Chris Matthews, the star of the MSNBC's daily talk show Hardball, has accepted hefty speaking fees from an array of conservative trade associations.

Matthews has given speeches to at least ten major conservative trade associations since 2001. The report's author, Dave Johnson, who blogs at Seeing The Forest and is also a fellow at the progressive Commonweal Institute, could find no records indicating that Matthews has spoken before any Democratic-leaning organizations. The report is not a product of the Commonweal Institute.

"Why is Matthews speaking at so many events with Republican-associated trade organizations?" Johnson asks. "What is NBC policy on speaking engagements and why does NBC keep it hidden? Are these trade associations paying Matthews to purchase influence?"

A call placed to Matthew's publicist was not immediately returned. An NBC spokesperson could not confirm to RAW STORY whether the network had banned the acceptance of speaking fees. It seems unlikely that Matthews would have spoken to so many groups pro bono. Matthews is also listed at a second speakers bureau here. Johnson says he made numerous calls to NBC inquiring about their speaking fee policy. He says his calls were not returned.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. No conflict of interest here.......none.
Move along now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. From the article:
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 07:08 PM by SCRUBDASHRUB
Howard Kurtz reported in 2002 that NBC had banned the practice of journalists accepting speaking fees but the report's author suggests otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting discovery ... I'm sure Insanity, O'Really and co do the same
But should they be allowed to host "fair and balanced" programs while accepting money from political groups that can push for guest slots, etc.? Any legitimate NEWS host shouldn't be allowed to do so, IMHO ... which makes these guys ... ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. tweety is a puke but swears he isnt.
whatever dem he ever had in him is long long gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. His wife works at the TV station in DC--DC mind you--that was the only
outlet in the southern MD-DC-NORVA region that carried Bill Maher's Politically Incorrect show. They canned the show after that episode where Bill discussed the 9/11 hijackings, and did not bring it back even after other outlets did. There was a HUGE email drive to get them to restore it, but they flat-out fundy-refused.

So the friggin' Congress couldn't even see what was a most-watched program, to get a sense of what people were saying about them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, I expect, have Scarborough and Carlson
and any number of other pundits. What liberal organization would have any of them?

Is this a scandal just because NBC hasn't been clear about their policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What happened to the bow tie twit, is he done at MSNoBodyCares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k8conant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. The bow tie twit is on vacation this week...
or so they said last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Propaganda Whore w/Zero Credibility
Too bad the suckers that listen to his lies didn't waste 100G per person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shocked, Shocked I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. I can't wait for the real author's work to be out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Yes, that will be quite interesting indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. And this is news becauuuuuuuuuuuuuuse...?????
I hope this help clear up the reason a LOT of us here do not like or trust Tweety, and I'm one of those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Yes, precisely. News because it's now explicit and documented
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 08:11 PM by RazzleDazzle
instead of just a sure thing but UNdocumented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. You can never trust.......
.....a dumb blonde.:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well Now It's Publicly Confirmed
The GOP owns the ever failing mainstream media....

New meme..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. so pundits make money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Enought already, he is a f*cking whore... lets move on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. I stop listening to tweety so many years ago when he lost his conscience
and sold out to the pukes. Tweety is a joke. I am surprised his show is still on the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tip has got to be spinning
certainly explains tweety's spin - and that even when he is critical of bushco/cons in congress - he reverses direction within a day or two and is back to bleating praises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Shall we call him Armstrong, now?
I guess no more Hardball for me, and less of MSNBC. I've gone back to CNN anyway, except that Kyra witch still bugs me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. People pay real money to listen to Matthews?? Couldn't afford Coulter
I guess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. at least with Coulter you get the sick thrill of the "car wreck effect".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Tweety compared Bush to Henry V, the warrior king!
Tweety has been a Bush apologist for years, so it is not surprising that he would take rightwing money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feistydem Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. I was thoroughly unimpressed with this Rawstory piece. Hyped up nothing.
None of the so-called rightwing organizations they listed seemed all that rightwing to me...

International Franchise Association;
the National Association of Chain Drug Stores;
the National Association of Convenience Stores

Oh my goodness, Tweety sold his soul to 7-11 and Burger King store owners!

I think he's a primadonna and a hack journalist, but this story is just hyped up crap. If he spoke in front of the gun lobby and then got on the air and talked up gun manufacturers' rights to make semi-automatic weapons for 'hunting' I'd say that's a story.

Rawstory made it sound like they had something really BIG --like he had an affair with his priest or something. I felt like they were jerking their readers around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. From a journalistic vs. a 'it's not news; next' perspective....here's my
two cents.

When I was in Journalism class in college, we discussed media bias. This was in the late 1980s, early 1990s. I recall the professor telling us that while many people have a view that the media "shifts" left, most reporters are actually middle-of-the-road. He may have been talking about print reporters.

I wonder if the statistics still hold true, now 14 years after graduation.

Granted, I don't consider Tweety a reporter (hell, Ted Baxter's more a reporter than Tweety?!), but for goodness sakes, is it too much to ask for balance in news, whether it be coverage, panel discussions, etc.?

In terms of objective news coverage on TV, is CNN Headline News the closest I'm gonna get to straight, objective news? Not very in-depth, but it's something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feistydem Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. I was in journalism classes those same years, and no doubt the news
has shifted from mostly staight reporting to entertainment and now out-and-out pandering to a political philosophy and/or corporate parentage.

Matthews never seems to know where he stands. I think he's flaky as all hell. I also think the Rawstory piece was also reaching for the entertainment, shock & awe factor with their headline of big breaking news yesterday only to follow up with this lame story on Matthews today.

I really miss the days of real investigative journalism when careers were made by breaking well-researched and deeply-sourced stories. Some journalists still seem to care about journalistic ethics and integrity. Josh Marshall is one of my favorites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Don't all pundits do this?
You'll see Hannity or Tim Russert giving speeches for lots of $$$. And ex-Presidents do the same thing. I don't see why this is a big shock. They could probably go through the speaking engagements of every single TV journalist & find something similar. I agree that Raw Story is losing creditability w/stuff like this. They may get more visitors in the short term, but those vistors won't come back if they feel like the site isn't getting real scoops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feistydem Donating Member (994 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Agreed. I don't need the big scoops...just don't jerk me around
with phony headlines to get me to come back tomorrow to read a half-baked story.

I don't appreciate DUers who write a subject line like, "I'm not voting for another Democrat!" and then you click on the link to see what all the fuss is about and they write, "Just kidding, but..." I think those should be dumped as flame bait as soon as they go up.

Maybe I'm just getting ornery in my old... oh wait, I'm not old. Maybe I'm just ornery, ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. HA!!!! I love it!!! He sold his soul,...like ALL dishonorable journalist
types have and, it's on the record.

He has no honor towards his profession, no loyalty to journalism, no commitment to the American people. He DESERVES to be called on his call: a "HO".h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's Not a Surprise
It's been increasingly obvious who butters his bread based on his public statements. I think the majority of DU'ers have recognized him as a media whore for a few years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
33. I wouldn't be surprised
I stopped watching him long ago, but it never seemed like he uttered a negative word about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. He's finally as bad as Russert. What a pair. Tweety loves Boehner.
Russert is still trying to pry his tongue off Rush's pilodinal cyst-laden ass. Now Tweety wants to join him with his tongue attached to the House Majority Leader's - er - Boehner. Enough. Get him, Sylvester.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC