Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice calls for a more open China

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 AM
Original message
Rice calls for a more open China
Speaking at a joint media conference with Australian counterpart Alexander Downer in Sydney Thursday, Rice said China "should undertake to be transparent about what that means."

~~Snippy-Snip~~

China's parliament last week approved a 14.7 percent increase in its annual military budget to $35 billion.

~~Snippy-Snip~~

Rice also said the U.S. would continue to work closely with China on global issues, such as North Korea's nuclear program, but would not hesitate to raise issues of concern.

~~Snippy-Snip~~

Rice said that along with transparency on China's military buildup, the U.S. believed China needed to pay attention to economic issues such as intellectual property rights, its currency regime, and government control of some business sectors.

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/03/15/australia.rice/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant, Condi! And right on time, as usual.
AFTER China has secured our nuts in a vice and are turning the handle at 1200 RPM.

Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. China calls for Rice to have a nice big cup of STFU nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. what complete hypocrisy
the chinese must find this sort of stuff really laughable. its like an alcoholic getting upset when a friend drinks a 'near beer'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ok Cunti, you sold like 2 trillion of our debt to China, so wadda ya do
if we can't pay up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Gotta object to your "nickname" for Condi.
Unnecessarily offensive.

Just my .02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Or worse! "US urges China to explain military build up" (AFP)
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 01:22 AM by Up2Late
(I'll see you "open China" and raise you a... US urges China to explain military build up ...from AFP)

US urges China to explain military build up


16/03/2006 05h12

SYDNEY (AFP) - The United States is concerned about China's military build-up and Beijing should make its intentions clear, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said. Rice was speaking at a news conference here after meeting Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and ahead of a new trilateral security dialogue with Japan on Saturday, at which China's growing power is top of the agenda.

"We've said we have concerns about the Chinese military build-up. We've told the Chinese that they need to be transparent," she said. "I heard there's going to be a 14 percent increase in the Chinese defence budget -- that's a lot -- and China should undertake to be transparent about what that means."

China announced earlier this month that its military budget for this year would rise 14.7 percent to 35 billion dollars, the latest in a series of double-digit annual increases dating back to the early 1990s.

Her remarks come amid a renewed rise in tensions between China and Taiwan after Taiwan's President Chen Shui-bian moved to suspend an advisory council set up to look at eventual reunification with the mainland. Beijing was infuriated by the decision, calling it a dangerous move toward Taiwan's "independence" and a threat to peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific.

(more bad news at links below)

<http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/060316040148.yg30vkbj.html>

<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2169980>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Come on, you guys got this from the onion, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm afraid not, it's just our incompetent Government at work.
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 02:38 AM by Up2Late
Have you started building your bomb-shelter yet, I'm starting on mine tomorrow. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nah, I'll just go out with a bang!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thanks for posting this.
:scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared::scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Notice Condiment's tone?
Look at how obliging she is here: "China should undertake to be transparent".

Now, if she was addressing Iran or maybe Venezuela, her tone would be quite different. It would be threatening, hostile. You better, OR ELSE.

Even though China is quite a flagrant violator of human rights. CondaLiar can't be too hostile......

.....because they're our creditor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. LOL, Condiment!!! I love it!
That's a first for me, mind if I steal it???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Actually its KindaSleezy



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. The largest militaritic country in the world complains. Shame on you, usa


Military spending accounts for more than half of the United States' federal discretionary spending,
which comprises all of the U.S. government's money not accounted for by pre-existing obligations <3>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military
http://zmagsite.zmag.org/Apr2005/monkerud0405.html

The U.S. will spend more on the military than the combined total that the rest of the world spent in 2003. This is 8 times more than China, which boasts the world’s second largest military, larger than the next 23 nations combined and 7 times larger than the combined military budgets of Russia and China. But the U.S. military budget fails to account for other military expenditures, which, if added together, account for an even larger share of world spending and a much larger share of the U.S. budget than indicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why Is She So Popular?
her weekly "urges" to other countries are nothing spectacular. Very dull and unconvincing - in one ear, out the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. China wants to protect itself from she-demons like her.
It only makes sense. The imperialist gall: "How dare China prevent us from using military blackmail against it." Thankfully there is no Chinese Gorbachev, yet. If China had gone down the road of the USSR, it would be very much poorer and weak right now. Condosleaza and Bush and the whole gang are teaching the world that power flows from weapons. They are very good teacher by negative example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. I know the answer to this one!!
"What is an oxymoron"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. Like China cares about what Condi or the U.S. thinks or wants...
Yeah right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. ROTFLMAO!!!
Too fucking hilariously full of irony!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. kick n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. I call more of a closed foul mouth from her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC