|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
quaoar
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:02 PM Original message |
Senator (Lieberman) takes issue with challenger's tone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Is widdle babykins cwying?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
49. He needs a Pampers change! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
louis c
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 06:42 AM Response to Reply #49 |
80. Run a TV ad showing LIEberman kissing GW Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 06:52 AM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Theat kiss always reminds me of the Godfather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #80 |
107. You mean like this.... ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 11:22 PM Response to Reply #107 |
119. Oh, Jesus H. on a Trailer Hitch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #49 |
98. Joementum Losernmann DINO Creep to the Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
2. Get used to that name calling, Joe, and I know a few people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shain from kane
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. No, the public wants you to grow some balls, Lieberman. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
60. It takes a lot of balls not to walk in lock-step with the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 05:29 AM Response to Reply #60 |
75. It takes even more balls to stand up for what's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 10:00 PM Response to Reply #75 |
117. I doubt that you will find any elected official who you agree with 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconoclastNYC
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 04:42 PM Response to Reply #60 |
111. Is that why he has a higher approval rate from Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 09:58 PM Response to Reply #111 |
116. His job is to represent all of the voters of CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Boo fucking hoo! Get out of the way, you loser,.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
53. LOL!! Boo fucking hoo LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't think joe knows what the public wants, but he may be finding out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebird
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. LIEberman objects to opponent being TRUTHFUL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burried News
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. Step aside Joe, for the good of the Republic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. Thanks Burried! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burried News
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Have another on me. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rooboy
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. God, he even uses Republican tactics... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
67. That was the first thing that I noticed, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
100. Next he'll say: "If you criticize me, the terrorists have won!" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
109. Lieberman got the GOP memo re: call Dems "angry" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. UpInArms objects to Lieberman's Republican tone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. He isn't a 'thumper by any stretch, he is phony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 05:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
76. Think again. He once said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
93. so does this CT Dem-when has Lieberbush ever come to meet his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. does he need a tissue for his issue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. Solly Mack, you just made me laugh out loud! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. LOL! Good! We all need to laugh - especially now when there's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riona
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
91. yes, issue the tissue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillZBubb
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. There was a time when a Democrat like Lieberman was OK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrSlayer
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. Truth hurt Joe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #13 |
92. The irony? Him repeatedly questioning Clark's affiliation in the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. "angry name-calling"? Gee if that isnt straight out of R tlking pnts... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katinmn
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. LOL! Since when did Joe ever care what the public wants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Hit him harder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Child_Of_Isis
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. angry name calling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. ok joe, lets talk issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. Damn, just like the ** administration he's projecting what the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harlinchi
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
94. I alays feel like hollering at the screen when I hear a GOP'er or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pithy Cherub
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Why is Lieberman jumpstarting his joementum so early |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MurrayDelph
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. It isn't "name-calling" if they tell the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lakemonster11
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
52. "Definition of Character"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 05:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
77. "Definition of Character" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
22. oh yes, joementum KNOWS what the public wants - sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
34. That's what the public wants - a pulse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
23. hows this for tone, go fuck yourself joementum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingshakabobo
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
24. Lieberman called Hannity "a great American." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bushy Being Born
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 03:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
73. Hehe, yeah, that thread was up a while ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. Maybe if he would have been a DEMOCRAT, he wouldn't be facing a challenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sorry Joementum, that shoe looks like it fits you fine from here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. Listen to Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
28. No Joe - the public not only WANTS it - it DEMANDS it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. I think "the public" will let Lieberman know what it "wants". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. Joe you don't know what the public wants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
31. Dear Republican Light; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jaysunb
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
32. We'll see what the public wants in August. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
33. Does Ned have a website? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliss
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. You know, for once I'm going to do something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:49 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. nedlamont.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jamesinca
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #41 |
114. thanks nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bread_and_roses
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
36. Oh my, oh my, thank you all for making me laugh so hard at Joe's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raysr
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
37. Hey Joe, it's YOU we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4dsc
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
38. SWEEEEEEEET!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wheezy
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:12 AM Response to Reply #38 |
71. nedlamont.com |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
39. The repukes said that Hillary was angry and now we see Lieberbush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kierkegaard
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
43. Ok, what does he think the public wants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
44. Bite me, Senator Frogvoice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
47. I don't like your tone! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
50. Wrong Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
51. As Dick Cheney so elegantly stated: "GO FUCK YERSELF, JOE!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kire
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
54. Actually, the public loves that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Thu Mar-16-06 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
55. Okay then, fair enough Joe, let's not make it about ONE issue.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
56. I have some angry names to call you, Joe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
57. Joe...go suck up to IMUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
58. "I don't think the public wants that." They don't want LIEberman either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msgadget
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
59. Okay, no name calling. Let's talk about the kiss instead. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
61. If Joefuckwitmentumshitbag thinks that's angry, he's totally lost it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KAT119
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
62. Joe shows no conscience or loyalty to American people/Constitution!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NanceGreggs
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
63. Hard to believe Jomentum can hear his opponent's 'tone' ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
64. I wish we had someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VegasWolf
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
65. No Joe, what the PUBLIC wants is you gone!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
66. Time to call a wahmbulance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
68. He sounds just like a Republican! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:30 PM Response to Reply #68 |
99. LOL! GTMA n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antonialee839
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
69. "Bush's favorite Democrat"=angry name calling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
70. Joe, who cares what you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:44 AM Response to Original message |
72. OK Joe, I puke when I remember I voted for you as part of the ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beltanefauve
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
74. What the? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voltaire99
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
78. Those of you with deep pockets: here's the race to spend it on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Submariner
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
79. Watch out or you all are going to get tomb-stoned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
81. Yes, the public prefers a droning moralizing lecture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
83. Well more bad news Joe, I have only met ONE local Dem. here in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jose Diablo
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
84. Adios Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
85. Ooooh - the truth hurts, doesn't it Joe? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
86. I won't call you any names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
87. In Joe's droning voice. "They are caaaaalling me naaaaames." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
88. Whiny little lawn troll...(how's that for name calling joe?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:42 AM Response to Reply #88 |
89. ROTFLMAO. WLLT. He was a big drag, visually and audibly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
90. STFU, Joe....you had your chance to be a REAL Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
95. Suppose Lieberwhore should have thought about that.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
96. Um, Joe? Fuck off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BiggJawn
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
97. Again! Again-again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
101. Bite me, Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
102. Anybody here from Connecticut? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I would like to know the answer to that question myself, but for Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #103 |
104. Well the reason I ask... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. yes, popular among Republicans in Connecticut. 3/4 approval, but only 50% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix2
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. see my post #93 to get my take--Lamont has no legislative background but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ps1074
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
108. Joementum is already using the GOP language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
110. This election should be about one issue only: Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malikshah
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
112. Wasn't there a character on Ally McBeal (a rival lawyer) who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neuvocat
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
113. LIEberman is a shithead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
98geoduck
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
115. LIEberman DISTORTS His Record.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Fri Mar-17-06 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
118. BITE ME, you fucking ugly worthless spineless ASSHOLE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ben Ceremos
![]() |
Sat Mar-18-06 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
120. Hey Joe, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC