|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Judi Lynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 12:25 PM Original message |
Supreme Court Backs Searches in Some Cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. well now thats why they made probable cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Crazy John Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Looks Like Another Case of Male Privilege to Me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 12:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Your post makes no sense.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Massachusetts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well Hell, I agree with that...Soooo whats the problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sivafae (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
5. I agree that this ruling in no way inhibits the action necessary for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
6. But... but... this implies a right to PRIVACY! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
7. Headline contradicts article content. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenCommie (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. Actual Decision: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yikes - will Roberts break with Scalia on ANYTHING? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kber (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 02:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Who ruled against? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Alito didn't vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kber (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 04:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. That's right! Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Roberts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 03:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I didn't say it is unexpected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH!LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
18. Supreme Court limits police searches in split decision; Roberts dissents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brothaman2k (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Assanine argument by Roberts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. the day that police raid his home within his concent he may have 2nd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Let's see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MASSAFRA (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-22-06 10:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. If the victim is injured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC