Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Opponents of S.D. Abortion Ban Seek Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:06 PM
Original message
Opponents of S.D. Abortion Ban Seek Vote
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 12:26 PM by Judi Lynn
Opponents of S.D. Abortion Ban Seek Vote
Friday March 24, 2006 4:46 PM

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) - Opponents of South Dakota's new ban on nearly all abortions began a petition drive Friday to let voters decide its fate.

The law, among the strictest in the nation, is scheduled to take effect July 1 but will automatically be placed on hold if opponents collect the 16,728 signatures necessary for a voter referendum.

A coalition of groups opposed to the law have until June 19 to collect the signatures. The secretary of state's office received initial paperwork signed by a lead opponent, Dr. Maria Bell.

The new law bans abortion in all cases except when necessary to save a woman's life, with no exceptions for rape or incest. The measure was aimed at sparking a court fight that supporters hope will lead to the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that established the right to an abortion.

Opponents argue the law is too extreme.
(snip/)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-5708708,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unleash_the_Backlash Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very smart ...
Great idea for keeping the case out of the court system.

I wish them luck. I wish I lived in South Dakota so I could sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please update the headline to the full title of the story
Opponents of S.D. Abortion Ban Seek Vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry, Moderator, didn't notice it was incomplete. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they can pull off a popular defeat of this law that would be great.
Letting the courts decide it would not have the same effect as one of the reddest of the red states voting it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. South Dakota Indian Tribe Will Open Abortion Business
Full Title: South Dakota Indian Tribe Will Open Abortion Business if Ban Becomes Law

<snip>

"A South Dakota Indian tribe is throwing a monkey wrench into the state's plans to ban virtually all abortions in the state. Should the ban become law, one tribe says it will open up an abortion business on their tribal lands, which wouldn't be subjected to the abortion ban.

Cecilia Fire Thunder, president of the Oglala Sioux tribe of South Dakota, says Sioux nation sovereignty means the new ban doesn't apply. As a result, she said she will lead an effort to build a Planned Parenthood abortion center at the Pine Ridge Reservation.

“To me, it is now a question of sovereignty,” she told Tim Giago who runs a web site called Indianz.com.

“I will personally establish a Planned Parenthood clinic on my own land which is within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation where the State of South Dakota has absolutely no jurisdiction," Fire Thunder said."

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbibaba Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not sure why, but reading this makes me happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOP Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wonderful!!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blust8 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is a very smart thing to do
Because even in South Dakota, this measure will probably pass. In that case, "activist judges" cannot be blamed for it--although conservatives will probably make an excuse for the vote if they lose it..such as bad weather, evil feminist intervention, etc :-p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why do you think it will pass?
Are you from SoDak?

And why do you think its passage makes this a "smart thing to do"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC